Review: Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows
Sherlock Holmes (Robert Downey Jr.) believes criminal mastermind Moriarty
(Jared Harris) is the fiend behind a series of bombings all around Europe that
appear to want to promote war between France and Germany. But why? Meanwhile,
Sherlock’s friend and confidante Watson (Jude Law) is getting married. You will
not be surprised to learn that stag night shenanigans are not the only trouble
Sherlock is about to get Watson into as the duo (also aided by Sherlock’s
diplomat brother Mycroft Holmes, played by Stephen Fry) try to work out just
what Moriarty is up to. Rachel McAdams returns briefly as Holmes’ acquaintance
Irene Adler, now in the employ of Moriarty. Noomi Rapace plays a French gypsy
fortune teller, and Eddie Marsan briefly reprises his role as the rather
humourless Inspector Lestrade.
My fears that Guy Ritchie (“Swept Away”, “Snatch”) would
turn the beloved Arthur Conan Doyle character into a pugilistic thug were
thankfully not realised in the first of his Sherlock Holmes adventures. It
mostly played like any other interpretation of the character, and Robert Downey
Jr. seemed perfect in the role. Besides, I’m no scholar of the character, so
there’s the possibility I don’t really know what I’m talking about. I do know
what I like and don’t like, however, and unfortunately, in this 2011 follow-up,
Ritchie and his star open things up with Sherlock engaged in fisticuffs. Some
of the film is amusing, but most of it is a bore, and a lot of it is overdone,
including Downey. The talented Oscar-nominated actor, rather than playing
Sherlock Holmes, seems to be aping Johnny Depp’s Captain Jack Sparrow in a
somewhat entertaining but a little too self-indulgent performance. Did Sherlock
really need to dress up as a woman at one stage? Really? Downey isn’t as self-indulgently
flippant as he was in “Iron Man” to the complete detriment of the film,
but he certainly tried my patience after a while. Funny, his performance never
bothered me (nor brought up Depp comparisons) last time out.
The banjo score by Hans Zimmer (“Rain Man”, “The Lion King”,
“Gladiator”), although suiting Ritchie’s interpretation of the
characters (as was the case previously), actually irritated me here. It’s too
insistent, and at times it even reminded me of the theme music for TV’s “Dexter”.
Overall, this is more of the same, only less. Sherlock engages in way too
much physical activity for a drug-addicted intellectual detective. The first
film got away with it, but this one doesn’t, especially when it appears that
Sherlock Holmes was the inventor of aikido! Ritchie is seemingly obsessed with
machinery and artillery, but what does any of this have to do with Sherlock
frigging Holmes? The nefarious plot, as it unfolds in the script by Michele
Mulroney and Kieran Mulroney (husband and wife, and I believe, part of the same
Mulroney clan as actor Dermot), deals with arms dealings and seemed far more
Bondian than Holmes to me. I may have bought it last time, but here I kept
wondering why Ritchie bothered making a Sherlock Holmes film at all, let alone two.
There are positives, albeit much fewer than last time. The production
design is fabulous and very appropriate, aside from all the mechanical
doohickies that seem like leftovers from “Wild Wild West” (and they
weren’t appropriate there, either).
Jared Harris makes for an effective Moriarty, even if he doesn’t perhaps seem
like the first actor you’d cast as an intellectual. One expected a bigger name
in the role (Lord Laurence Olivier has played the role previously, for
starters), but the rather underrated Harris is nonetheless very good (I’m
convinced his vocal performance is based on the late Patrick McGoohan, anyone
else agree?). Stephen Fry was seemingly born to play Mycroft Holmes if you ask
me, and is spot-on. He’s easily the gayest thing in the film, but I must admit,
when Holmes and Watson dance together at one point, I did wonder...not that
there’s anything wrong with that. Jude Law, as was the case last time, is a
terrific Dr. Watson, at least Guy Ritchie’s version of Dr. Watson.
The ladies are a disappointment, however, with Rachel McAdams offering a
mere cameo reprisal, and (the ubiquitous) Noomi Rapace’s French accent coming
and going annoyingly frequently.
For the most part I found this film a tedious reprisal of things that
mostly worked the first time, but served to either bore or irritate this time.
It’s only about two hours long, but the film seems interminable.
Rating: C-
Comments
Post a Comment