Review: WALL-E


Set in a 29th century Earth seemingly abandoned by humanity and visually resembling something like a giant junkyard, this is the story of the title robot (voiced by Ben Burtt, a “Star Wars” sound design whiz) who gets awful lonely all by himself. Then one day he happens upon a more modernised robot named Eve, and they are fast friends. However, their relationship hits a dead stop all of a sudden, as the ship Eve came from has come to pick her up. Wall-E manages to hitch onto the ship, and what he discovers you will have to see for yourself.

 

Oh, am I ever gonna catch hell for this, but here we go nonetheless. If not the worst Disney/Pixar film to date (and it probably is), this 2008 Andrew Stanton (“Toy Story”, “Finding Nemo”, the rather dull “A Bug’s Life”) animated flick is certainly the most tedious. Although I know many people love it, I think this one’s best left to snooty critics who will dig its “Short Circuit” and “ET” done by Godfrey Reggio (“Koyaanisqatsi”) vibe. As for me, I kinda dug the visuals, but that’s about it. It’s certainly no “Monsters, Inc.” or “Finding Nemo”, that’s for damn sure.

 

The colour scheme is a bit monochromatic, but the burnt-out copper/brown look to most of the film is admittedly beautiful in its own way. ***** MILD SPOILER ALERT ***** It’s pretty nicely textured CG animation, as well, though as with a lot of these things the human animation is rubbery, blobby, cartoony-type stuff that doesn’t really mesh with the more realistic images throughout the rest of the film. ***** END MILD SPOILER ***** The characters certainly didn’t grab me. If the title character was meant to hold my interest for 90 minutes or so, making his visage a mixture of “ET” and Johnny 5 (crossed with a bulldozer) was the wrong way to go about ingratiating him to me. It’s a little on the nose, to be honest, and I bet focus groups were involved in development. He’s nauseatingly cutesy and marketable, yet incredibly bland and one-note at the same time. His voice, meanwhile, gets nails-on-a-chalkboard unbearable very quickly (This from the man responsible for R2D2’s charming beeping and chirping). This thing is so cloyingly cutesy that 20 minutes in and I felt a sugar-related vomitous (Google tells me it’s a word, so AutoCorrect can go fuck itself) feeling inside me mixed with crushing boredom. Then another cutesy robot turns up looking like a cross between Marvin the Martian and an iMac, and my eyes were rolling so far into the back of my head that I was scared they’d get stuck there. So you’ve got two robots, what do you get them to do in the film? Oh, you have one show the other a bunch of cool pop culture stuff and 20th century toys/artefacts, of course. Right…sigh.

 

I guess it’s an interesting idea to make a kids movie set in a Dystopian/post-apocalyptic future, but for me this just wasn’t done well at all. If you can connect with the title character, you’ll probably like it. The lack of dialogue for much of the film probably helps give it a bit of cross-cultural appeal. It just didn’t appeal to me. For me, I was never drawn in because I could see the cynical process that went into creating the character: Toy merchandising! Once that happened, I was kept at arm’s length to the film’s frankly minimalist story and (forgive me) mechanical characters. It bored me to tears.

 

Fuck this movie (And before you call me up on the language, remember that philosopher Billy Connolly asserts that there’s no such thing as bad language, only bad use of good language!). It’s cynical, pandering, calculated, Happy Meal bullshit that not even quality animation can redeem. This could’ve been quite imaginative and interesting, but it isn’t and I hated it. It’s one of the most beautiful pieces of shit I have ever seen. There you go, that’s your quote right there. The ludicrously Oscar-nominated screenplay is by Stanton and Jim Reardon (an alum of “The Simpsons”, who also worked on the story for the much better “Wreck-It Ralph”), from a story by Stanton and Pete Docter (co-director of the overrated “Up”). Maybe “Turbo” wasn’t so bad after all…

 

Rating: D

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Hellraiser (2022)

Recovering junkie Odessa A’zion accompanies scuzzy boyfriend Drew Starkey on a break-in where all they find is a weird puzzle box. A’zion later opens the box and after some weird shit happens, A’zion and Starkey figure it might be a good idea to learn more about this messed up trinket. Goran Visnjic plays a millionaire who possessed the box before our protagonist nicked it.   Is there any point in remaking/rebooting “Hellraiser” when the 1987 adaptation of Clive Barker’s original text was written and directed by Barker himself? And is considered a horror classic? On evidence here, absolutely not. Directed by David Bruckner ( “The Signal” ) and scripted by Ben Collins ( “The Night House” ) and Luke Piotrowski (ditto) this is an entirely tedious affair. I took a long time to get on board with the 1987 “Hellraiser” , I have to admit. It was wildly imaginative and original, like a nightmare transplanted on to film. However, the characters were stone cold and left me similarly chilly t
Read more

Review: Cinderella (1950)

The story of poor young Cinderella (voiced by Ilene Woods), treated as a servant by her nasty stepmother (voiced by Eleanor Audley), and dismissed by her thoroughly rotten, ugly stepsisters. Her only friends are a group of mice, who are forever being menaced by a cat named Lucifer (or as I call him, Grumpy Cheshire Cat). The King (hoping to find a wife for his charming son) is throwing a ball and every available young woman is invited to attend, and Cinderella is most excited to go. However, her stepmother and stepsisters do all they can to prevent this from happening. But with help from the mice and one fairy godmother (voiced by Verna Felton) later, and Cinderella looks set to attend the ball. You know the rest, folks.   Lovely 1950 Disney animated movie from directors Clyde Geronimi ( “Peter Pan” , “Lady and the Tramp” ), Wilfred Jackson ( “Fantasia” , “Alice in Wonderland” , “Peter Pan” ) & Hamilton Luske ( “Pinocchio” , “Fantasia” , “Peter Pan” ), that is a bit too s
Read more

Review: Eugenie de Sade

Eugenie (Soledad Miranda) makes a deathbed confession to author/biographer (Jesus ‘Jess’ Franco himself), recounting the tale of how her depraved stepfather (Paul Muller) groomed her into a life of depravity, debauchery, and murder.   Not to be confused with the similarly titled “Eugenie…The Story of Her Journey into Perversion” (by the same director) or “Justine de Sade” (which is not to be confused with Franco’s own “Justine” for that matter), this 1973 Marquis de Sade adaptation from writer-director Jesus Franco ( “99 Women” , “A Virgin Among the Living Dead” ) is perhaps the perfect marriage of Franco, sleazy material, and actors. Basically this is what Franco’s “She Killed in Ecstasy” might’ve been like if it were based on a Marquis de Sade work. There’s a few slow spots here and there, but overall I actually think this is Franco’s best film. Yes, even better than my previous choice “Vampyros Lesbos” , and better than his more ‘respectable’ films like “Count Dracula” (a
Read more