Review: Nocturnal Animals
Art gallery owner Amy Adams,
currently unhappily married to upper crust Armie Hammer, receives a gift from
her ex-husband Jake Gyllenhaal. It appears Gyllenhaal has finally finished his
big novel, and he wants Adams to read it first before it goes to publication.
Dedicating it to Adams, she starts to realise the story’s violent and painful
contents may be more than just a simple fictional crime story. Andrea
Riseborough, Michael Sheen, and Jena Malone plays Adams’ snooty colleagues,
whilst Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Isla Fisher, and Michael Shannon play ‘characters’
in Gyllenhaal’s novel.
This 2016 film from
writer-director Tom Ford (whose “A Single Man” I liked very much) tells
two stories, and to be honest one was far more intriguing to me than the other.
This despite the fact that the other story featured very fine performances by
Amy Adams (especially terrific) and the underrated Armie Hammer. I also reacted
badly against the opening pretentious arty nonsense. Yes, it’s relevant to the
character in theory, no Ford did not need to specifically go there. It’s
grossly exploitative for the sake of showing off and being daring. In fact, I
think Ford exploits the naked female form throughout the entire film,
eventually in a really foul way for one or two unnecessary late scenes
(including an imagined rape scene that Ford ought to have left unseen by the
audience). The Amy Adams scenes are a stunningly cool-looking, austere piece of
filmmaking, and the music score by Abel Korzeniowski is nice too. However, this
portion of the film played for me like latter day Roman Polanski, and also
features a hideous Jessica Lange-ish performance by a frozen Laura Linney (who
is also too young for the part anyway).
I was much more interested in the
story-within-the-story. Here we get some really nice low-level lighting from
Seamus McGarvey (“The War Zone”, “Godzilla”), and although Isla
Fisher is no Amy Adams, the performances by Jake Gyllenhaal, a terrific
Oscar-nominated Michael Shannon, and a never-better Aaron Taylor-Johnson more
than compensate. Moreover, the crime story/mystery told is genuinely gripping,
whereas the rest of the film really rests on the shoulders of Adams and is a
tad underdone. The film would probably have to run 3 hours to really tell both
stories fully, as is there’s an imbalance. Although a little similar to Jeff
Bridges’ character in the same year’s “Hell or High Water”, Shannon
nonetheless has a magnetic presence on screen. As for Gyllenhaal, his best
moments are in the second half, though by then I’d even started to see issues
with that part of the film. Once you’ve discovered the central conceit, it
seems a bit silly. Meanwhile, Andrea Riseborough and the normally energetic
Jena Malone are stifled by Ford’s arch vision in the present day scenes and give
affected performances beneath their talents. Riseborough also looks completely
ridiculous.
A frustrating film with two
stories of uneven interest and quality that don’t come together as smoothly as
I would’ve liked in the end, either. I didn’t quite believe the conceit at the
end of the day. The performances are mostly excellent, but Ford’s pretentious
filmmaking is a bit of a turn-off.
Rating: C+
Comments
Post a Comment