Review: Alone in Berlin
Set in Germany during WWII,
Brendan Gleeson stars as a German factory foreman who along with wife Emma
Thompson lose their only son in battle, serving Hitler’s Germany. Crippled with
grief and looking for a direction to put his anger towards, Gleeson comes to
hold The Fuhrer himself responsible for his son’s death. Gleeson has the
inspired but very dangerous thought of writing postcards to warn others of what
The Reich are sentencing their sons to and placing them all over the city. It’s
an act of defiance that could lead him and Thompson (who, loyal to her husband,
goes along with the scheme) to an untimely death themselves. Daniel Bruhl turns
up as the police inspector assigned the case when word finally gets to the
brass.
This 2017 wartime drama from director
(though largely an actor) Vincent Perez sounds like a can’t miss on paper. Two
of the world’s best actors in Brendan Gleeson and Emma Thompson, a third very
fine young actor in Daniel Bruhl, and an inspired-by-fact-based story that
would seem to not only bring in WWII buffs but also tug at the heartstrings and
really draw an audience in to a personal pain endured by the lead characters.
Sadly, as much as Brendan Gleeson gives a mighty lead performance, the film is
surprisingly uninvolving and it now makes sense to me why the film isn’t
terribly well-known.
Gleeson really is one of the best
actors going around today, and he’s immediately perfect in this, as he brings
more than just weight of the physical kind here. He says a lot early on with
his face and zero words. A working class German, he suffers a personal tragedy
that now has him becoming more and more defiant against Hitler and his regime.
I don’t like to give Germans of the period too much of a free pass, especially
those who served in the military, but one isn’t going easy on them to simply
tell the truth and say that they were following orders given by their
government figurehead. Failure to follow orders or to dissent was likely to be
killed. Here’s the story of one guy who did, in his own way, dissent against
the status quo. Early on you think this will result in a powerful story in the “Schindler’s
List” vein but from a more personally motivated point of view. This guy
blames The Fuhrer specifically for the senseless death of his son and now wants
everyone to be made aware of it. So it’s a shame that Perez has taken such a
distressingly low-key, dreary approach. Given the emotions inherent to the
story and the tension involved in Gleeson’s defiance at great risk, the film is
distressingly inert and flat.
As for the cast Gleeson’s great,
Bruhl’s fine in a multi-layered part, but Emma Thompson has had better days on
the job. None of the three are able to elevate the film out of the stodge,
though in Thompson’s case her poorly written character leaves her a bit
disadvantaged to begin with. The fault, I think comes down to the script and
director Perez, who doesn’t energise the plot nor put enough emphasis on
emotion to make the thing work. It also feels a bit slight, even at 90 odd
minutes you feel it’s a bit underdone and too slow-moving as well.
This could’ve and should’ve been
great. It looks great, Gleeson is great, WWII is usually a fascinating subject
but…it’s actually a really dull film. Perez has failed his actors and the
subject matter, I think. Based on a novel by Hans Fallada, the screenplay is by
the director and Achim von Borries (writer-director of “4 Days in May”,
another WWII film).
Rating: C
Comments
Post a Comment