Review: A High Wind in Jamaica
In the mid-19th Century, parents Nigel
Davenport and Isabel Dean are raising their family in hurricane-afflicted
Jamaica. After the latest storm, the parents decide that perhaps their children
(including young Deborah Baxter) would be better off back home in the more
‘civilised’ England. So they put them on a ship captained by Kenneth J. Warren,
and off the kids sail. Unfortunately, the vessel is taken over by grubby
pirates led by Anthony Quinn, with James Coburn his bemused First Mate. After
they realise there’s not much of value to take from the ship, the pirates board
their own vessel, only to find that the children have ended up aboard. The
pirates don’t wish to be caught kidnapping a bunch of kids, so they plan to
pass them off onto a brothel madam acquaintance of theirs, played by Lila
Kedrova. However, along the way the kids start to rub off on gruff Quinn, which
starts to irritate Coburn and the other men.
There were differing views on how to adapt Richard
Hughes’ novel for the silver screen, and it would appear that for this 1965
Alexander Mackendrick (“The Ladykillers”, “Sweet Smell of Success”),
the less interesting Disney-ish flick treatment won out. That’s not what I had read,
but looking at the film as is, I see Disney all over it, despite not actually
being from The House of Mouse. Still, for me all of the entertainment value of
this high seas adventure for the juvenile set is in the adult cast: Anthony
Quinn, James Coburn, Nigel Davenport, Dennis Price, Lila Kedrova etc., all
interesting performers appearing in a film that would rather spend more time on
a bunch of samey kids in a non-musical blend of “The Sound of Music” and
“Swiss Family Robinson” with pirates. It’s far from a bad film, it’s
just that it’s not really my kind of things and I wasn’t overly invested in it.
I didn’t think much of young Deborah Baxter (she has
one ‘duhhh’-looking facial expression throughout), the only member of the young
set who gets even half a personality, whilst the rest of the little urchins are
completely nondescript. A blustery Anthony Quinn is well-cast, and James Coburn
is able to switch between amused and cool to fed-up and frankly mutinous very
easily. Kenneth J. Warren is very fine as the captain as well. For my money,
Lila Kedrova steals the show. She’s not in the film much, but when she is,
she’s a hoot. It’s a shame that she, Nigel Davenport, Dennis Price (who only
turns up at the end), and a thoroughly wasted Gert Frobe (a year after “Goldfinger”)
are given such short shrift as they’re all very interesting and charismatic
actors. The kids…not so much. It’s a pleasant film and well enough made for
what it is, but of intermittent appeal for me. The courtroom finale is
completely deflating and rather odd for the genre and target audience.
Look, I’m viewing this as an adult and it’s clearly
not a film aimed at adults. It’s for children, and although I’m not sure how
the children of 2021 would take to the film, I imagine that the children of the
1960s would take to the film a heck of a lot more than I did (will they care
about the courtroom stuff at the end though?). I’m going to grade it based on
my own reaction to the film, but with the caveat that I’m aware I’m not the
target audience here. Besides, it’s not like there aren’t kids films I don’t
love, albeit mostly ones I first watched when I was a kid myself. All I can say
is I found it disposable, and it would’ve been even less appealing to me
without the adult cast members. Adapted from Hughes’ novel by the trio of Stanley
Mann (“The Silent Flute”, “Eye of the Needle”, “Sky Riders”),
Ronald Harwood (“The Pianist”, “The Dresser”, “Australia”,
“Quartet”, “Being Julia”) and TV writer Denis Cannan, it’s an OK
film at best, nothing more.
Rating: C+
Comments
Post a Comment