Review: Juno and the Paycock

A poor Irish family during the 1920s comes into some money, and it doesn’t seem to bring happiness. Edward Chapman (the ‘Paycock’ of the title) and Sara Allgood (his wife ‘Juno’) are the patriarch and matriarch of the family respectively, the former a blathering barfly. John Laurie is their troubled son, an IRA member.

 

The more of his films that I see, I’ve had to change my tune on the worst film directed by Sir Alfred Hitchcock (“Strangers on a Train”, “Vertigo”, “Shadow of a Doubt”). As of the time of writing this review I have now seen all 52 of his films (with “Downhill” being the last viewed, review to come) that are still available. So I can safely say that this 1929 bore is easily his worst film still publicly available. Where was the plot? It only arrives after about 30 minutes, which is 15 minutes too late. Where was the progression of said plot? Nowhere. I had heard that the film has a creepy, unusual atmosphere but even directorially this is mostly a point-and-shoot filmed play effort from The Master. It’s inert and void. I know it’s the 1920s, but I needed more than a story about a poor family that comes into money and things don’t go to plan.

 

And it’s so endlessly talky! It was apparently the first Hitchcock film to use long takes…he probably shouldn’t have bothered. The sound quality and badly employed Irish accents don’t help, either. The dialogue is often very difficult to discern. Edward Chapman is our leading man and he’s the most tiresome bore of a lead character you’ll come across. On a better day Hitchcock would’ve kept these rambling, Irish drunk characters to the margins for comic relief purposes in an otherwise more compelling narrative. If you do decide to endure it, look out for Barry Fitzgerald making his film debut as narrator/orator here. Sara Allgood is well-cast but not a miracle worker.

 

Lifeless and uninteresting silent Hitchcock, only watch it if you’re a completist like me. Even then you’ll likely struggle. Why should I have cared about anyone or anything here? Based on a Sean O’Casey play, Hitchcock scripted along with his wife Alma Reville.

 

Rating: D-


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Hellraiser (2022)

Recovering junkie Odessa A’zion accompanies scuzzy boyfriend Drew Starkey on a break-in where all they find is a weird puzzle box. A’zion later opens the box and after some weird shit happens, A’zion and Starkey figure it might be a good idea to learn more about this messed up trinket. Goran Visnjic plays a millionaire who possessed the box before our protagonist nicked it.   Is there any point in remaking/rebooting “Hellraiser” when the 1987 adaptation of Clive Barker’s original text was written and directed by Barker himself? And is considered a horror classic? On evidence here, absolutely not. Directed by David Bruckner ( “The Signal” ) and scripted by Ben Collins ( “The Night House” ) and Luke Piotrowski (ditto) this is an entirely tedious affair. I took a long time to get on board with the 1987 “Hellraiser” , I have to admit. It was wildly imaginative and original, like a nightmare transplanted on to film. However, the characters were stone cold and left me similarly chilly t
Read more

Review: Boyka: Undisputed

Yuri Boyka (Scott Adkins) is out of prison and fighting for a living, with ambitions for the ‘Most Complete Fighter’ to make a real name for himself. However, after an opponent dies during a fight, the deeply religious Boyka starts to have a crisis of conscience. He tries to make amends with the man’s widow, which eventually pits him against a local gangster (Alon Moni Aboutboul, quite good). Anything with Scott Adkins will generally get me interested, and although this series peaked with the superlative “Undisputed II: Last Man Standing” , this 2017 film from director Todor Chapkanov (director of the SyFy movies “Copperhead” and “Ghost Town” ) is no slouch in a series yet to deliver anything less than solid entertainment. Producer Isaac Florentine is missed in the director’s chair, but Chapkanov gives us at the very least the series’ most dramatically ambitious entry, as Adkins’ ‘most complete fighter’ Yuri Boyka continues on his journey to redemption here. In this one, the
Read more

Review: Ninja 2: Shadow of a Tear

Scott Adkins is once again Casey, an American proponent of the martial art of Ninjutsu. When Casey’s pregnant Japanese wife (Mika Hijii) is rubbed out, he’s on a vengeance mission to find her killers. A friendly face, Nakabara (Kane Kosugi) turns up at the funeral, and suggests Casey come to Thailand to deal with his grief in another country. Casey initially declines, but eventually takes Nakabara up on his offer. However, his wife’s murder still haunts Casey, and with intel supplied by Nakabara, the trail eventually leads Casey to a brutal drug baron named Goro (Shun Sugata).   I was extremely disappointed with the first “Ninja” , but had heard that this 2013 sequel from director Isaac Florentine ( “Undisputed II: Last Man Standing” , “Undisputed III: Redemption” , “Ninja” ) was a damn near masterpiece of the martial-arts action movie genre. Having now finally gotten my hot little hands on it, I’d say the hype is a bit much, but this is unquestionably a much better film than the f
Read more