Review: Freud
Depicting the early stages in the career of Dr.
Sigmund Freud (Montgomery Clift), whose progressive ideas for treating the
mentally ill earn the ire of his stuffy colleagues. This is especially the case
with Freud’s mentor Dr. Meynert (Eric Portman) who believes the patients are
merely faking illnesses for attention. Susannah York and David McCallum play
disturbed patients whose neuroses will result in the formation of Freud’s
Oedipus-complex theory (with Freud having daddy issues himself that haunt him
as well). Larry Parks plays Freud’s friend and professional colleague, Rosalie
Crutchley plays Freud’s mother, Susan Kohner is Freud’s wife, Allan Cuthbertson
plays another professional colleague, whilst director John Huston narrates the
film.
The frustratingly uneven penultimate film in the
career of Montgomery Clift sees him unhelpfully cast as a supposedly neurotic
Sigmund Freud. This 1962 biopic from director John Huston (director of my
favourite film “The Misfits” a year prior, co-starring Clift) and
screenwriters Charles Kaufman (“Breakfast for Two”) and
Wolfgang Reinhardt (“Hitler: The Last Ten Days”) just
never convinced me that I was seeing the story of Sigmund Freud. Being choppy
and episodic doesn’t help either, but at the basic core of it, I just didn’t
buy into what I was being given and thus felt at arm’s length to most of it. Clift
– one of the all-time great actors in my opinion – looks nothing like Freud,
and if the real Freud was wracked with neuroses himself (and I’ve indeed read
that to be the case), I simply didn’t believe the version of it presented here.
Having the already rather troubled Clift play the role, it’s too heavy-handed. Apparently
he was a wreck at the time and Huston treated him like crap. Perhaps this is
part of the problem, and Huston should’ve either re-cast the role or eased the hell
up on Clift. It’s just too over-the-top to be credible, almost psychodrama at
times. The idea of Freud showing signs of mental illness also comes off as a
bit gimmicky/clever for the sake of it here. Ooooh, the infamous psychiatrist
Freud was neurotic himself! Yeah, OK. That’s cute, but not enough for me to be
invested in an entire film of it.
If you’re looking for a real biopic of the man from
birth until death, you won’t get it here. This is an occasionally
experimental/arty film about mental illness in both patient and psychiatrist
and focuses on just a short period in Freud’s life. I wasn’t quite as
interested in that as I probably would’ve been a straight biopic, at least not
the way Huston has given it to us. Having said that, at least on a thematic
level the film was fascinating at times. It didn’t draw me in emotionally or
dramatically, but it was at least intellectually stimulating from time to time,
I can’t deny that. It has also been wonderfully shot in stark B&W by
Douglas Slocombe (“The Blue Max”, “Raiders of
the Lost Ark”) , the film’s greatest asset. It’s in the
direction and cinematography that this film stands out more than story or
character, even if the dream sequences are a touch over-the-top. The music
score by the great Jerry Goldsmith (“A Patch of Blue”,
“Planet of the Apes”, “The Omen”) is
quite fine too and earned him his first Academy Award nomination. Most of the
cast surrounding Clift is pretty impressive, though I wasn’t sold on the
normally terrific Rosalie Crutchley. Cast as Freud’s mother, she’s all too
British-sounding and it’s a bit distracting. Eric Portman is excellent and feels
far more Freud-like than Clift, whilst Susannah York runs off with the entire
film. Hers is a tricky role that could’ve gone horribly hammy, but she reins it
in just enough. There’s also a rock-solid performance by a well-cast David
McCallum as a nervy patient with mother issues up to yin-yang. Even Larry Parks,
not an actor I’ve previously cared much for, is quite good here too. So there’s
plenty to like here, but with something screwy at its centre the film didn’t
quite work for me.
Well-directed, well-shot, and mostly well-acted this
biopic is intellectually stimulating but ultimately fails to convince. Thus it
keeps one at a distance emotionally. The depiction of Freud as being as
neurotic as his patients is overdone and would’ve benefitted from a less
neurotic, more subtle lead performance. There’s perhaps too much Monty Clift here
and not enough Siggy Freud. I think Huston was aiming high here but not quite
getting there in the end.
Rating: C+
Comments
Post a Comment