Review: Wild Geese II
Brother and sister John Terry and Barbara Carrera, who work for Robert Webber’s
TV network, hire stone-faced Lebanese-American mercenary John Haddad (Scott Glenn!)
to snatch famed Nazi Rudolf Hess (Lord Laurence Olivier) from an impregnable
Berlin prison and bring him back so the aging Nazi will reveal all his secrets
about Hitler. Meanwhile, a German working for the Russians (Robert Freitag) is
also after Hess, as are the British, led by Kenneth Haigh, and even the
Palestinians have an interest in things. Edward Fox plays a British
sharpshooter and the brother of Richard Burton in the first film, Paul Antrim
is a British Sergeant-Major on Haddad’s team (which also includes a French
driver and a smart-arse IRA guy), whilst Ingrid Pitt plays one of Freitag’s
assassins, and Patrick Stewart (who regrets appearing in this, apparently)
plays a Russian.
The original “Wild Geese” was a terrific entry into the all-star
‘guy movie’ genre (sitting just a rung below the likes of “The Dirty Dozen”,
“The Great Escape”, and “The Magnificent Seven”). This belated
1985 sequel from veteran editor Peter Hunt (director of films like “On Her
Majesty’s Secret Service”, “Shout at the Devil”, “Assassination”,
and “Death Hunt”) isn’t as good as the first film, but is never dull and
the Nazi plot is irresistible fun until the rather crappy ending. Besides, with
The Cannon Group behind it (home to every cheap Chuck Norris and Michael
Dudikoff flick of the 80s), the film could’ve come out looking a whole lot
worse.
Scripted by old pro Reginald Rose (“The Wild Geese”, “12 Angry
Men”, “Whose Life is it, Anyway?”), it’s a jolly good yarn, even if
its slow progression to the mission is indicative of Hunt’s usual problem: His
directorial efforts are strangely not very tightly edited for someone with an
editing background. Even “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service”, a fine Bond
entry, suffered from that a bit. The cast isn’t as stellar as in the previous
film, but there are some interesting people here. Scott Glenn doesn’t look
remotely Lebanese, but as the stoic, no-nonsense, Pittsburgh-raised Haddad, he
shows that he can do the hard-arse Lee Marvin-type thing quite well. Barbara
Carrera might not be the world’s greatest ever actress, but she oozes movie
star glamour, and this film is no exception. She sort of ended up being a bit
of a flash in the pan after the 80s, but I have no idea why. She looks amazing
and is quite good in this, even if I prefer her in ‘bad girl’ mode (ala “Never
Say Never Again”). Playing the brother of Richard Burton’s character from
the first film (but essentially playing the Roger Moore role from the first
film, if that makes any sense), Edward Fox is having an ‘off’ day here. I like
that he’s playing Burton’s brother (the film is dedicated to the late Burton),
but not only does Fox fail to play Roger Moore as well as Roger Moore does (and
Roger Moore could be insufferably smug at times), but he’s completely overboard
and rather annoying. His hammy dialogue delivery actually sounds like he’s been
poorly dubbed, but it really is Fox and he’s pretty awful. Much more effective
are the always watchable Kenneth Haigh (albeit in an easily telegraphed role),
a butch-looking Ingrid Pitt (her knockers look huge in this!), “Dirty Dozen”
alum Webber, and rock-solid Antrim (essentially having the Jack Watson RSM
role from the first film). Freitag plays a fascinating role in completely
stiff, dull fashion, and by the time Olivier turns up it’s obvious who he’ll
play. Sadly, he spends most of his time unconscious, and the rest of the time
giving the same irritating, high-pitched vocalisation and performance he also
gave in “The Boys From Brazil”. Greatest actor of all-time my hairy fat
arse.
The horribly insistent music score by Roy Budd (“The Wild Geese”, “Get
Carter”, “The Stone Killer”) is wildly inappropriate for the
material as it sounds like music for a bad 70s cop movie, not a war-actioner
from 1985. Look, overall the story in this is irresistible, even if it’s a bit
slow in unravelling. It’s a good yarn, warts and all, but the first film is
certainly preferable.
Rating: B-
Granted, it isn't as fine a film as 'The Wild Geese,' but few of this genre are, or ever will be. It's a pity that Burton couldn't have gotten in on the work; perhaps he would have brought it up a notch or ten. Still, 'Wild Geese II' is worth the price of admission, provided one doesn't enter with expectations too too high.
ReplyDeleteExactly, I think it's a pretty underrated film and not THAT far below the original.
Delete