Review: Swordfish
Hugh Jackman plays a recently paroled computer hacker who isn’t even
allowed to touch a computer anymore. That doesn’t stop sexy Halle Berry and her
employer John Travolta (an anti-terrorist guy who may or may not be a terrorist
himself) from trying to hire him to aid them in an almost $10 billion
electronic bank robbery (hacking into a secret government account). Berry uses
her sex appeal (and her $500,000 breasts), but what really gets the reluctant,
relative nice guy Jackman on board is the chance to regain custody of his
daughter (Camryn Grimes) from her porn star mother (Drea de Matteo) and mum’s
porno director new squeeze. Don Cheadle plays an FBI agent well-known to
Jackman, and possibly on another collision course with him. Vinnie Jones and
William Mapother are associates of Travolta’s, and Sam Shepard plays a corrupt
Senator.
A boring action/crime flick from 2001 is further rendered near
unwatchable due to a wank-job treatment by director Dominic Sena (who began
work in music videos for Janet Jackson before directing “Kalifornia”, “Gone in 60 Seconds”, and “Season
of the Witch”) and cinematographer Paul Cameron (who would later overdose
on cinematic masturbation in the remake of “Total Recall”), and a
typically fatuous ‘Ain’t I cool?’ bad guy performance by John Travolta. The
whole film overdoses on wannabe cool, and is entirely irritating, from
performances, direction, cinematography, wardrobe, music score, and even the
frosted tips in Jackman’s hair which make him even fruitier than when he played
Peter Allen (He also wears a purple shirt at one point. Were they having a joke
about his theatrical past or something?). Sena and Cameron’s go-to tricks are
annoying colour correction (monochromatic colour tints/filters) and in one
absolutely ridiculous and fake-looking scene, a circular tracking shot of a CGI
explosion. It’s perhaps the most ridiculously over-the-top, pretentious
set-piece I’ve ever seen...except there’s one later in the film that absolutely
is the most ridiculously
over-the-top, pretentious set-piece I’ve ever seen (you’ll know it when you see
it, believe me).
The action is beyond ludicrous but not in any fun way because there isn’t
any effort in providing genuine thrills, just style. The coloured filters are
so bad that I couldn’t even enjoy Berry’s usually lovely skin colour, as it’s
alternately green or yellow at times in this film (There is a lot of yellow here). Meanwhile, did you
know that government agency interrogation rooms have green lighting? And
matching interior decorating? At one point we even get purple lighting. Where
outside of the movies do you find these places with such bright-coloured and
all-consuming lighting? It’s the bane of my existence, as any of you familiar
with my reviews are well aware of by now. You’d swear it was directed by an
interior decorator or hair stylist.
Mr. Sena also has no concept of pacing or tension, something fatal in
what is essentially a heist film. It takes at least 45 minutes before
Travolta’s character finally brings up what is going to be the main heist in
the film. That’s at least 15-20 minutes too late for a film that only runs a
little over 90 minutes. The squeaky techno score by the normally reliable
Christopher Young (“Hellraiser”, “Flowers in the Attic”, “Drag
Me to Hell”) is nauseating and headache-inducing.
The characters are frankly all scummy and unlikeable, except maybe
Jackman’s, but his is a cliché. His performance is probably the best of the
leads, though (BTW, he also wears an earring. Forgot to mention that earlier.
Sweet Fancy Moses). Acting is certainly not to Ms. Berry’s advantage, Oscar
statue or not. Her performance is horribly forced here, and she certainly isn’t
able to convey the complexities of her character, who is ultimately revealed to
not be who she first appears. She can’t even get the femme fatale part right,
let alone the twists and turns in her role. The mousy, sweet, somewhat fragile
actress is clearly miscast. Being hot is only half of what is required of you,
sweetie. Meanwhile, her expensive topless scene merely shows up the film’s
rather quaint views on sleaze and sex. It’s not nearly as sexy as it thinks it
is, few films are since the late 90s. Also, when you look at her roles in this,
“Monster’s Ball”, and “Die Another Day”, one gets the feeling
Berry wouldn’t be a favourite actress amongst feminists or strong,
African-American women. There’s something a little bit questionable about her
choice of roles, don’t you think? And coming from me, that’s saying something.
But Travolta’s the biggest problem, though opening the film with him
talking about Hollywood making shit with bad performances is unintentionally
hilarious. I guess Travolta’s character must’ve seen a lot of Travolta’s own
films. Then again, this is the same idiot who thinks “Dog Day Afternoon”
(which along with “Asphalt Jungle”, is the gold standard of all heist
films) came out in 1976. Try 1975, douchebag. Well, OK, screenwriter Skip Woods
(“X Men Origins: Wolverine”, the film version of “The A-Team”) is
probably the douchebag. The name ‘Skip’ pretty much guarantees it, right?
Travolta’s climactic terrorism/patriotism speech, meanwhile, is one of the most
tired, clichéd things you’ll ever hear. Travolta has never impressed me as a
bad guy and here he’s still imitating Nic Cage (His haircut even seems inspired
by Cage). I didn’t like the impersonation in “Face/Off” (another action
wank-job) and I don’t like it here, either. He isn’t even remotely threatening.
You want to punch him, but that’s the actor, not the character. I think it’s
the stupid beret that was the tipping point for me. I’m sure Travolta had fun
playing the part (and admittedly the character isn’t at all what he first seems
to be), but I took no pleasure in watching him. Vinnie Jones is well-cast but
underused, Don Cheadle and Sam Shepard are wasted. Tate Donovan fares even
worse, essentially playing ‘guy who sits while Shepard talks’.
I just had a really bad time with this one, but it’s a matter of style
and taste for the most part, and I was never able to get into the film from the
beginning. If you’re on this film’s wavelength, you’ll probably view it a lot
more kindly than me. But for me it aggressively represents everything I hate
about action movies from the years since it was made. It’s a pretentious,
wannabe piece of crap film.
Rating: D
Comments
Post a Comment