Review: My Darling Clementine
The story of the feud between the Earps and the Clantons, mostly set in
Tombstone where things are set in motion when young James Earp (Don Garner) is
killed and their cattle stolen. His elder brother and town marshal Wyatt Earp
(Henry Fonda) swears to bring the killer (s) to justice. His brothers Morgan
(Ward Bond) and Virgil (Tim Holt) also become his deputies. Said killer is Old
Man Clanton (Walter Brennan) the nasty head of the Clanton family, whose sons
include Ike (Grant Withers) and Billy (John Ireland). Victor Mature plays ‘Doc’
Holliday, a moody gambler with tuberculosis and a severe case of self-pity. Doc
is currently running with hot-tempered, trashy saloon singer Chihuahua (Linda
Darnell), who in turn is having an affair with Billy Clanton. Things get even
more complicated for Doc when a girlfriend from out of town named Clementine
(Cathy Downs- whose career only lasted ten films) arrives, looking for him. His
rejection of her proves to by Wyatt’s gain, though. Background characters
include Shakespearean actor Granville Thorndyke (Alan Mowbray) and Jane Darwell
as a local elderly woman who has to assist Doc (who in real-life was supposed
to be a dentist, not a surgeon) in some rather makeshift surgery.
Although I think this story has been far more entertainingly told in
films like “Gunfight at the OK Corral”, “Tombstone”, and “Hour
of the Gun”, this 1946 John Ford (“Stagecoach”, “The Grapes of
Wrath”, “The Searchers”, “The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance”)
western has some strong elements. Chief among these is the film’s look. Ford
and B&W cinematographer Joe MacDonald (“The Young Lions”, “Warlock”,
“Niagara”, “Mirage”) give the film a dark, shadowy, noir look
that is starkly beautiful and fascinating. It’s probably the best-looking Ford
film I’ve seen, and unlike any other western I’ve ever seen from a
cinematography point of view. I’m shocked MacDonald wasn’t nominated for an
Oscar
The performances are also rock-solid. Henry Fonda is an interesting
choice for Wyatt Earp. As played by Fonda, the character is not quite as
forceful a presence than say, Burt Lancaster made him, but Fonda is easy to
take as a figure of righteousness and sympathy nonetheless. Victor Mature has
one of his rare commendable outings as Doc Holliday, as well, at least this film’s
interpretation of the character. I’ve heard Vincent Price was considered for
the part, and whilst Mature is fine, that would’ve been incredible. Ward Bond, a veteran of many a John Wayne picture, is
also rock solid as Morgan Earp.
The one who stole it for me was veteran character actor Walter Brennan as
mean Old Man Clanton. I know Brennan had played villains several times, but
he’s especially nasty here. It’s a bit of a shame, then that the characters
themselves just don’t ‘pop’ the way they do in other versions of this tale. The
Earps and Clantons, besides Wyatt and the Old Man, are all frankly a bit
interchangeable, except that you’ll recognise Ward Bond, Tim Holt, and John
Ireland (who later played gunslinger Johnny Ringo in “Gunfight at the OK
Corral”). I suppose that was true of “Gunfight at the OK Corral”
too, but I preferred that film’s Wyatt and Doc much more than this film. More
scenes with the lovely Jane Darwell would’ve been greatly appreciated, too.
Scripted by Samuel G. Engel (the excellent “Night and the City”) and
Winston Miller (“Gone With the Wind”, “Lucy Gallant”), the
characters just aren’t as iconic or interesting this time around.
The film is also a tad too romantic in its portrayal of ‘Doc’ Holiday for
my liking. He was given much more of an edge when played by Kirk Douglas in “Gunfight
at the OK Corral” and Val Kilmer in “Tombstone”. I also didn’t much
take to the title character, who isn’t historically accurate, as she was a mere
bit player in the real story. I don’t recall Wyatt and Doc having shared a
female love interest, and we all know Wyatt left his wife for an actress named
Josephine, right? Ford, who actually met Earp, claims his version of the actual
gunfight is pretty accurate, but this isn’t entirely so, and he plays fast and
fancy with the truth at other times throughout (We all know Doc had a different
ending than the one depicted here, and I’m pretty sure Morgan was an actual
living participant at the gunfight, Mr. Ford!). Some might not be bothered by
historical accuracy, and the facts may not have been as well-known back then, I
dunno. But it bothered me nonetheless (and historical inaccuracy doesn’t always bother me), and when stacked up
against other films about these events, this one isn’t the best of the lot.
Still, this is a solid, if low-key film and an exceptionally
well-photographed one. It’s entertaining, just not as entertaining as other
versions of the same story and seriously overrated. You certainly won’t be able
to get the title tune out of your head, though.
Rating: B-
Comments
Post a Comment