Review: The Devil’s Playground
Set
in Australia in the 50s at a Catholic boarding school for youngsters interested
in becoming part of the Brotherhood, Simon Burke stars as young teen Tom, who
although dedicated, has issues with masturbation and sinful thoughts, and also
wets the bed. Meanwhile, the authority figures are having their own struggles,
with somewhat laidback, beer-loving Brother Victor (Nick Tate), and borderline
psychotically repressed Brother Francine (Arthur Dignam) both tempted by
pleasures of the flesh. Thomas Keneally (!) turns up as a visiting priest,
Charles McCallum and Jonathan Hardy play two of the Brothers, Anne Phelan tries
to pick up Tate in a pub, and her “Prisoner” alum Sheila Florence plays
an Irish cook (Oh no, don’t put Lizzie in charge of the tucker!) at the school.
I
don’t know if it’s because the TV miniseries sequel deals with darker subject
matter or if it’s my own bias rearing its head, but this 1976 directorial debut
from writer-director Fred Schepisi (“Roxanne”, “Evil Angels”) is
a bit lighter and more innocuous than I was expecting, for the most part.
Instead of paedophilic priests (subject matter that perhaps is more modern than
this film’s era), the film is really about the stifling atmosphere of a Catholic
boys’ boarding school on both staff and students, the latter being in the midst
of a sexual awakening (If you ask me, the Catholic church really shouldn’t be
involved in guiding youngsters on the verge or in the midst of puberty, and not
for the reason you’re thinking, either. I just don’t think they’re equipped for
it. Others may disagree, which is fine. I’m neither an expert on education,
child development, nor Catholicism). Apparently semi-autobiographical, it’s an
interesting look at a time and world that I’m not especially familiar with.
Future
“Play School” host Simon Burke gives a very brave debut film
performance, having to engage in both masturbation and mutual masturbation
scenes, as well as playing a chronic bed-wetter. It’s awkward stuff, but
intentionally so, and Burke (currently starring in the TV miniseries sequel as
I write this in September 2014) handles himself with great maturity, and
probably deserved his AFI award. The one you’ll remember, however, is the
underrated Arthur Dignam, whose portrait of sexual repression driven to
breaking point is mesmerising. Charles McCallum also shines as the aging
Brother Sebastian, who basically tells Burke he should leave the school and
live life to its fullest rather than submit his entire life to serving the
church and God. Celebrated author Thomas Keneally is interesting casting as a
visiting missionary Father Marshall, who initially comes across as affable and
cheery, and then delivers the most incredible fire-and-brimstone description of
eternal damnation you’ll ever hear. It was almost scary enough to have me
praying to every deity I could think of, and I’m an agnostic atheist! I must
say, though, that my modern perspective and general distrust of the Catholic
church might’ve led me to see Keneally’s early scenes as more creepy than cheery
and affable, as they were most likely designed to be. He made my skin crawl to
be honest. Still, for a non-actor, Keneally is surprisingly solid, though both
he and the director don’t seem to recall his performance too fondly for some
reason.
Less
effective is the frankly miscast Nick Tate (who nonetheless was the co-winner
of the Best Actor AFI with young Burke). When you see him out of his formal
clothes and in the pub, you feel like that’s where he belongs, he just doesn’t
seem like a teacher, let alone a Catholic one. That, and an early scene where
he seems a little too obsessed with kids having erections and their sexual
orientation (and uses some very unholy language to boot) led me to be
completely befuddled by the film’s ending. It was only on reflection that I
realised that his character was meant to be somewhat liberal and well-meaning
in comparison to some of the other teachers. Casting someone other than Tate
(not a terribly affable presence onscreen. Remember “The Coolangatta Gold”?)
would’ve helped this confusion somewhat.
Nonetheless,
this is interesting, occasionally powerful stuff, and a helluva subject for
someone to take on as their film debut. If you can remove any prejudices or
pre-conceived notions you might have of what the film is about (which are
likely to be wrong), and see it for the awkward
coming-of-age-in-a-repressed-institution story that it is, the film is worthy.
Dignam is particularly outstanding.
Rating:
B-
Comments
Post a Comment