Review: Solomon Kane
Set in the early
1600s, Solomon Kane (James Purefoy) is a pirate mercenary in the middle of a
raid in Africa, but runs afoul of the Devil’s Reaper (Ian Whyte), who wants to
claim his damned soul. But Solomon manages to escape, and we pick up a year
later, with Solomon seemingly a changed man working towards redemption, though
still plagued by his decision to abandon his father (Max von Sydow) as a
wayward young man. He ends up accompanying pious Pete Postlethwaite and his
family (including Alice Krige and Rachel Hurd-Wood), before they are attacked.
Solomon has sworn to a life of non-violence, but an act of the most shocking
evil, Solomon knows he must take to violence once more, even if it means
damnation for his soul. He must thwart the evil, masked Overlord (Sam Roukin),
though he is merely the servant of sorcerer Malachi (Jason Flemyng). Along the
way he reunites with his elderly father, who delivers some (not-so) shocking
news about The Overlord’s true identity. Mackenzie Crook turns up briefly as a
slightly odd priest.
Stylish, but
slow-moving 2009 (though filmed much earlier, and only released in Australia in
2010) adaptation of short stories from the popular Robert E. Howard (“Conan
the Barbarian”, “Red Sonja”, “Kull the Conqueror”). Written
and directed by Michael J. Bassett (the underrated UK survival action/drama “Wilderness”),
it’s never quite as exciting as you want it to be, with James Purefoy lacking
the necessary charisma, acting chops, and gravitas in the lead. The character
is fascinatingly tortured and solemn, but Purefoy plays him in singularly
uninteresting fashion. I mean, this guy shows Jesus was a bit of a pussy, he
doesn’t need a magic show to survive crucifixion, pulling himself off the
nailed cross! Take that, Jesus! But Purefoy is just…kinda there. He never really puts his stamp on it or sells any of it in
interesting fashion. I know Viggo Mortensen can’t play every stoic fantasy hero
role, but it just goes to show how bloody fantastic he was in the “Lord of
the Rings” films, he would’ve been a perfect Solomon Kane. I guess one can
be thankful that Christopher Lambert didn’t play the role, perhaps (Indeed, he
was interested in it at one point. Crisis averted there!).
It seriously
perks up in the last 10-15 minutes with an enjoyable climax being by far the
best part of the film. It’s a shame that Jason Flemyng’s highly entertaining
villainy is confined solely to this final stretch. The opening scene is good
fun too, I mean the Devil’s Reaper has a flaming sword for cryin’ out loud. A flaming
sword! Perfectly cast pros Max von Sydow, Alice Krige, and especially the late
(and very sorely missed) Pete Postlethwaite help make up for Purefoy’s slack
somewhat, as does the director’s visual style.
The snowy Czech
scenery and cinematography by Dan Laustsen (who lensed the terrific
genre-hopper “Brotherhood of the Wolf”) are stupendously impressive, I
must say. But this pulpy fantasy-action stuff is played out a bit too
sluggishly for my liking here. We only get to Solomon’s main quest after about
30 minutes or so. A mixture of “Pirates of the Caribbean”, “Shane”,
“Ghost Rider” and the underrated “Season of the Witch” and “Jonah
Hex”, it never quite delivers the goods. I bet Howard’s work is a helluva
fun read, but the film is just a tad disappointing, despite some really
interesting elements and a terrific premise.
I liked some of
this very much (and brave is a film that will have its hero refuse to take
violent action to save a child, and then the child is killed!), but Purefoy’s
dull performance and Bassett’s poor sense of pacing hold one back from truly
embracing it. Not bad (It’s better than Uwe Boll’s “In the Name of the King”
for instance), not quite good. But bear in mind, I’m not a “Conan” fan
either.
Rating: C+
Comments
Post a Comment