Review: An Affair to Remember
Prominent
celebrity playboy Cary Grant and singer Deborah Kerr meet on a luxury liner and
despite both being in relationships with other people back home, they find
themselves hopelessly drawn to one another. As the ship is about to dock, they
make a promise to one another that if after 6 months they still can’t get over
one another, they will reunite at the top of the Empire State Building. One of
them shows up, but although dearly wanting to, circumstance prevents the other
from meeting the deadline, leaving the other heartbroken. Will our protagonists
ever reunite? Cathleen Nesbitt plays Grant’s elderly grandmother, who takes a
liking to Kerr when the duo make a stop to see her in French, mid-voyage.
Richard Denning plays Kerr’s Bill Pullman…er…tedious spouse.
The inspiration
for the finale to “Sleepless in Seattle”, this 1957 romance from
writer/director Leo McCarey (“Duck Soup”, “The Awful Truth”, “Going
My Way”) is founded on a story that frankly isn’t very romantic, and it is
far lesser than “Sleepless”. It’s not nearly as bad as “A Touch of
Class”, but as you probably know by now, whilst I don’t remotely judge
anyone for falling in love with someone else whilst in a relationship, I also
don’t find the concept fitting for a romantic film specifically. I just don’t,
no not even in “From Here to Eternity” (That beach scene is excellent,
but if you watch the film, it’s not nearly as ‘romantic’ as you remember and
wasn’t meant to be). “Sleepless in Seattle” (which ultimately is a very
different film) pretty much avoided that pitfall, but this film steps right in
it.
The opening
stretch on the cruise ship is pretty poor, to be honest. Don’t want anyone on
board gossiping about your affair, Mr. Grant? Then don’t fucking have one, OK?
The heart wants what it wants, but it just isn’t entertaining romantic movie
fodder to me. Casting the rather caddish Cary Grant as one half of the romantic
duo is at least offset by the casting of the more prim and proper Deborah Kerr
as his love match, I’ll give the film that. It also has one thing over “A
Touch of Class” and that is the fact that these two are very clearly in
love with one another, whereas George Segal and Glenda Jackson spent the whole
film yelling at each other, seemingly pointlessly. The fact that they clearly
belong together helps a great deal. I also thought Cathleen Nesbitt stole the
film right out from underneath the two stars in a wonderful supporting role.
Another asset to
the film is the absolutely wonderful, Oscar-nominated colour cinematography by
Milton Krasner (“All About Eve”, “Home From the Hill”, “How
the West Was Won”). It’s so incredibly beautiful to look at, even if the
film itself doesn’t seem to deserve such beauty. There’s one great shot of Kerr
on one half of the screen and a reflection of the Empire State Building on a
window for the other half of the screen. That was masterfully done. The film’s
subplot concerning all the gossip, media attention and Grant’s celebrity status
is most unhelpful and clunkily done (it’s too comedic in an otherwise dramatic
film), and the whole thing moves at a glacier pace.
And when they
finally get ashore, things take a decided turn for the (even) worse as we see
Kerr is meant to be an English nightclub singer in Boston singing Irish songs.
Fucking what? She has a lovely voice (or was it Marni Nixon?), but it just
doesn’t seem like something the refined Ms. Kerr would ever do. **** SPOILER
WARNING **** Things completely implode when Kerr goes to meet up with Grant
and suddenly seems to lose her mind. We don’t get the transition or set-up to
this medical issue, and even if we did it’d be moronic. After this, she somehow
gets a job teaching music to kids. Like all lunatics, right? At least she’s
more believable as a kids’ music teacher, though. But it’s all so incredibly
confusingly done that I had no idea if she had an illness or disability or if
she was dying or not. It’s horribly written (NB: I’ve subsequently read that
she was struck by a car and paralysed. But A) I don’t recall seeing that, and
B) She acts completely insane, not disabled. So even if I missed something, it
plays out bizarrely **** END SPOILER **** That said, the final scene
itself is actually really, really moving in spite of everything before it, and
the best thing in this otherwise forgettable and very, very strange film.
Romantic classic?
Hardly, and not a very good film anyway. Terrible, cheesy Vic Damone title song
and irritating pink cursive titles deserve a dishonourable mention. A remake of
McCarey’s own “Love Affair” from 1939, I’d stick to “Sleepless in
Seattle”, or preferably “When Harry Met Sally”.
Rating: C
Comments
Post a Comment