Review: Dream Lover
Kristy
McNichol stars as a NY jazz flautist, newly moved into the area with boyfriend
Justin Deas. One night she is attacked in her apartment and nearly raped,
before she fatally stabs the intruder. Unfortunately, the nightmare has only
begun for her- she’s literally having nightmares about the incident. It doesn’t
help that Deas cheats on her, and there’s something not quite right with her
relationship with dad Paul Shenar, either (Kissing on the lips for one thing).
Along comes Ben Masters, a handsome dream analysis researcher who wants
McNichol to be a part of his experiments. And hey, if it cures her of her
problems, that’s a bonus. Unfortunately, it looks as though it’ll only make
things worse. John McMartin and Gayle Hunnicutt play family friends (who are
only in the film to cast aspersions on Mr. Shenar for possible red herring
purposes).
Not
the crowning achievement in the career of director Alan J. Pakula (“Klute”,
“All the President’s Men”, “Sophie’s Choice”), this 1986
psycho-drama/quasi-horror film is pretty poorly done. Star Kristy McNichol is
usually a charismatic presence on screen, but she seems completely uninterested
in being here, and given the subpar Brian De Palma-esque nature of the
material, I don’t really blame her. Scripted by Jon Boorstin (who worked for
Pakula in various technical capacities over the years, but has become mostly a
TV writer since the 90s), the film’s idea of reading a person’s dreams on a
graph is absurd. How can you tell what exactly she was dreaming about just by looking
at a graph? You can’t get specific info like that from a simple graph. “Spellbound”
this ain’t, it’s more like the dated “Brainstorm” and “Dreamscape”,
but much worse (Apparently there was a ‘technical consultant’ involved, but my
guess is their expertise was in hydroponics, not dream analysis). Then again,
this is a film that shows McNichol, already miscast as a jazz flautist, getting
a record deal in 1986 playing the flute and attempting to scat. Um…no, sweetie.
Just no.
The
wonderfully surreal, dream-like cinematography by ace Sven Nykvist (“Persona”,
“Cries and Whispers”, “Chaplin”, “Sleepless in Seattle”)
is a major asset, but despite not being easy to predict the ending, the film is
still bloody awful. It’s shockingly edited (including some appallingly
amateurish night/day/night gaffes), confusingly plotted, drab, and ultimately
pointless. McNichol looks sensational in teeny weeny cotton panties, though.
That’s an important detail.
I’m
really not sure what Pakula saw in this material, and you’d have to be a
die-hard McNichol fan to get much out of this misfire which eschews chills and
horrors for wannabe-Bergman dry pretentiousness and goober jazz flute lameness.
Rating:
D+
Comments
Post a Comment