Review: 20,000 Years in Sing Sing
Spencer Tracy
stars as a cocky hoodlum arriving at New York’s Sing Sing prison for a 5-30
stretch, though he thinks he and his slick lawyer Louis Calhern can buy his way
into preferential treatment. Unfortunately for them, the Warden (Arthur Byron)
is entirely incorruptible and is hell-bent on reforming the young punk whether
he likes it or not. Bette Davis plays Tracy’s girlfriend on the outside, whilst
Lyle Talbot plays another prisoner.
Although it seems
awfully lumpy now, this 1933 prison flick from director Michael Curtiz (“The
Private Lives of Elizabeth and Essex”, “Casablanca”, “King
Creole”) is well-shot and the acting keeps it from sinking. Louis Calhern
in particular steals his every scene, the slippery bastard, and you wish he
were in much more of the film.
The film is
ultimately not very convincing, it only barely holds up over 70 years later,
but the script is the problem here, everyone else does their damn best. So
blame the quartet of Courtney Terrett (“Castle on the Hudson”), Robert
Lord (“Little Caesar”, “Hard to Handle”), Wilson Mizner (“One
Way Passage”, “Hard to Handle”), and Brown Holmes (“I Am a
Fugitive on the Chain Gang”). Or perhaps former Sing Sing warden Lewis E.
Lawes, on whose (presumably biased) book the film is based. Lawes was still
warden at the time of filming apparently (and allowed interiors and exteriors
to actually be shot at Sing Sing), and no doubt wanted to present a good
picture of prison wardens, but the film goes way too far. The warden (rather
well-played by Arthur Byron) allows prisoners out to visit sick/dying loved
ones, with merely the prisoner’s word of honour (as a criminal?) that he’ll
return. What. The. Fuck. It gets worse, though. ***** SPOILER WARNING *****
Spencer Tracy allegedly kills someone while on leave, but the warden is
vindicated in letting him out for the day simply because he returns? He’s still
an alleged fucking murderer! Yes, the audience knows he didn’t actually do it,
but no one else knows it. Vindicated my arse. ***** END SPOILER ***** So
obviously, things don’t really hold up so well all these years later, with
prison seemingly being run like a home for wayward young boys rather than
hardened crims.
Thankfully the
cinematography and acting come up a winner. The film is rather well-shot in
B&W by Barney McGill (“Hard to Handle”, “Charlie Chan in
Shanghai”), prison bars and shadows are always a pretty sight to me. The
lighting is really nice without being so artistic that it seems phony. Spencer
Tracy, Bette Davis, and Louis Calhern hadn’t quite hit their strides as actors
by 1933, but all three do fine jobs here. Spencer Tracy’s role seems more of a
Jimmy Cagney or Edward G. Robinson part to me (and indeed, Cagney was the
original choice but unavailable at the time due to a legal dispute with
Warners), but once you get past the ‘Hey…why,
I oughtta…!’ voice Tracy is putting on, he proves to be good as always. I
don’t think I’ve ever seen him underperform as an actor. He looks shockingly
young, too, playing this pugnacious hoodlum who thinks he’s a bigshot tough
guy. Even more so than in 1937’s “Kid Galahad”, if you’ve never thought
it possible that Bette Davis was once young and attractive, watch this film.
Like the aforementioned film, this isn’t the best use of Davis, but she gives a
good performance nonetheless. However, Louis Calhern easily walks off with this
film as one of his patented villains with an outward veneer of respectability.
Look for a very young Lyle Talbot playing a smart prisoner. It’s a shame Talbot
will forever be remembered for his participation in “Plan 9 From Outer
Space”, because he shows himself to be pretty damn good here I must say.
Time hasn’t been
terribly kind to this prison film, and its depiction of the grandfatherly
relationship between prisoner and warden just doesn’t wash anymore, but this is
a good-looking film with several solid performances, and a one-time pairing of
two great stars in Spencer Tracy and Bette Davis. So you have to see it at
least once. It’s watchable, but lumpy.
Rating: C+
Comments
Post a Comment