Review: Night Train to Lisbon
Jeremy
Irons plays a rather lonely academic professor in Switzerland, teaching
languages. One day he saves a despondent young Portuguese woman from jumping
off a bridge, but before he knows it, she has run off. However, she has left
behind a book that takes the professor’s fancy. Written in Portuguese, it’s an
autobiographical tale written by Amadeu do Prado (Jack Huston in flashbacks),
and concerns the revolutionary goings on in the country in the 70s. Although
not normally the impulsive type, he’s so taken by this book (and presumably the
young woman) that he abruptly leaves his post and heads for Lisbon to track
down the author. Once there he manages to locate the author’s sister (Charlotte
Rampling), a haunted-looking woman extremely reluctant to talk at all. However,
a friendly optician (Martina Gedeck) leads him in the direction of her elderly
uncle, Tom Courtenay. Now in a nursing home and extremely difficult, he was one
of the author’s revolutionary colleagues. Bruno Ganz and Christopher Lee turn
up as another former colleague and a priest, respectively. August Diehl plays
the younger version of Bruno Ganz’s character in flashbacks, whilst Melanie
Laurent and Lena Olin play the younger and older versions of yet another
important part of the revolution.
I
rather enjoyed this 2013 Bille August (“Pelle the Conquerer”, “The
House of the Spirits”) film, especially for the terrific all-star cast and
rather dour atmosphere. However, I think this will play best for those among
you more intimately familiar with 70s Portguese politics. I’m not sure how
large an audience that would be, but for me, coming into this one with zero knowledge
of such cultural/political matters, I found myself a bit lost, and a tad
removed as a result through the flashback scenes. The fact that these flashback
scenes involved some of the least interesting and least high-profile actors
probably didn’t help either.
Jeremy
Irons has never been my favourite actor, but he fits the role of a lonely
professor like a glove. He’s like a seedier, older Colin Firth in a way. It
might seem like a stretch that someone would leave their life and do what
Irons’ character does in this, but when you basically have no life, perhaps an
impulsive departure from that lack of a life and going off on some mysterious
journey is understandable. Irons is spot-on as a man who doesn’t normally
strike one as the impulsive type, but for some reason is compelled to act this
one time. He is backed up by excellent performances from Christopher Lee, Bruno
Ganz, and especially Charlotte Rampling and Tom Courtenay. There isn’t a bad
performance in the film, but it’s those two you’re gonna remember here more
than anyone, even Irons. Rampling looks positively haunted and pained from her
very first scene, it’s a really vivid performance from her. The underrated Tom
Courtenay, meanwhile, contributes an interestingly dour, bitter performance. These
two characters have clearly seen and endured a lot, but one is more willing to
talk about it than the other. Martina Gedeck is absolutely lovely too, as
Courtenay’s niece, who takes somewhat of a liking to Irons during the film. The
then 91 year-old Lee had clearly lost some height over the years and has a
walking stick here that may or may not be a prop. But he looked in better
health than in some of his recent films like “The Resident” and “Burke
& Hare”. Playing a man of the cloth not for the first time, Lee is like
everyone else here; sorrowful, world-weary, etc. Rock-solid work from one of
cinematic history’s longest-serving actors. Bruno Ganz plays perhaps the most
damaged character in the entire film. This guy is extremely cagey and
depressed, and Ganz is more than up to the task. As is August Diehl, who plays
the younger and less embittered version of the character. Of all the actors in
the flashback scenes, he’s the only one to stand out. Melanie Laurent and Lena
Olin look so far removed from one another however, that at least one of the two
has to be considered miscast as the two versions of the same character. Since I
find Laurent absolutely lovely, I’ll go with Olin (BTW, the character is a spy
with a photographic memory. I’ve always found that to be not very helpful. I
mean, if the information is in your head, it puts your life in more danger than
say, having it written down somewhere. Seems short-sighted to me). Jack Huston
is merely OK as Amadeu de Prado, but to be honest, based on the character’s
writings read by Irons, he sounded like a pretentious dick to me. So there was
a bit of a disconnect for me there.
The
film’s look and atmosphere are characters unto themselves here, and
fascinating. Obviously the locales and architecture here are fantastic, even if
the lighting by cinematographer Filip Zumbrunn is at times a tad muted in night
scenes. More than anything, though, it’s the somewhat dour, pained, and cagey
mood created here that stands out. It’s not just in the performances, it’s in the
look and overall feel of the film. This looks like such a nice, peaceful and
quaint place that the characters inhabit, but there’s clearly a dark history to
it.
I
somewhat resented screenwriters Greg Latter and Ulrich Herrmann for not giving
the uninitiated a helping hand with their adaptation of the Pascal Mercier
novel. I don’t expect to be spoon-fed, but my studies in history at school
didn’t quite extend to Portugal, I’m afraid, and I don’t think I’ll be alone in
that. I’m happy to share some of the blame with my obvious ignorance of such
historical matters, however. I found enough to like here to give it a mild
recommendation, but I think history buffs and the arthouse crowd are the best
audience for this one.
Rating:
B-
Comments
Post a Comment