Review: Soylent Green
Charlton Heston
plays a NY cop in 2022, which is typically overpopulated, and processed food is
all that is available to the masses, manufactured by The Soylent Corporation.
Heston is investigating the death of Joseph Cotten, the head of Soylent, who
has been murdered in his apartment. His superiors think it’s just a case of
petty theft turned wrong (and given Cotten was rich enough to afford ‘real’
food, it’s not implausible), but Heston is adamant there’s more to the story.
And boy is there ever! Edward G. Robinson plays Heston’s elderly assistant,
Brock Peters plays Heston’s boss, Chuck Connors plays Cotten’s thug bodyguard,
Roy Jenson an assassin, Whit Bissell is a politician with connections to
Soylent, Leigh Taylor-Young is Heston’s love interest, and Lincoln Kilpatrick
and Dick Van Patten have cameos as a preacher and…well, I can’t even describe
Van Patten’s role. Just see the movie, trust me.
Alright, so the
element of surprise is gone with this 1973 sci-fi flick from Richard Fleischer
(“Fantastic Voyage”, “Barabbas”, “The Vikings”, and the
infamous “Mandingo”) and screenwriter Stanley R. Greenberg (“Skyjacked”
with Charlton Heston), thanks to “The Simpsons”. We all know what
Soylent Green really is by now.
However, this film has more than a twist ending going for it. In fact, I’d
argue that the big twist is easy enough to predict without being a “Simpsons”
fan from the moment you hear the words ‘waste disposal’ in practically the
first ten minutes. And yet, it doesn’t ruin one’s enjoyment of the film, at
least not for me. Hell, transparent or not, it’s still an interesting and
audacious twist, and only really slightly
lessens the film’s effectiveness. Adapted from a novel by Harry Harrison, I
think it’s actually one of the most underrated sci-fi films of the 70s and
certainly better than Heston’s “The Omega Man”.
The film starts
interestingly with an effective view of historical human innovation leading up
to the film’s ‘futuristic’ worldview of 2022. Yes, we’re very close to reaching
that year as I write this in 2015. Pretty scary, all things spoiler-y
considered. The scene where a book from 2015-2019 has Edward G. Robinson
lamenting that books ‘had paper once’ is quite creepy watched by me in 2015.
It’s not far from the reality we have already now! It’s an interestingly bleak
future worldview, and the film looks terrific too, even if at times it feels
like the future was designed on the distant memories of someone of the 70s era.
Good-looking or not, the occasional 70s elements turning up are probably the
only flaw here for me. It’s a little limited in imagination, in that sense,
though it still manages to create an interesting futuristic urban nightmare
visage.
You can see what
the theme is here, a fear of processed foods wiping out organic foods. It’s a
clever idea on an issue that still hits home today, really. We still live in a
society that tends to promote organic foods whilst most of us, especially below
the upper class tend to consume more (affordable) processed junk instead
(Guilty as charged right here).
Chuck Heston is
in fine form as the futuristic cop who is like a less robotic Deckard from “Blade
Runner” (or at least, could be a cop in that film’s futuristic world).
Personally, given the futuristic-yet-70s vibe of the film, I think James Coburn
would’ve been an even better choice for the lead. He’s much more at home
playing the 70s lover man than the super-serious Heston (even a laidback James
Garner might’ve been interesting in the part). But it’s Heston we have, and
it’s one of his best roles of the 70s for sure, he does a very fine job with
it. Less interesting is leading lady Leigh Taylor-Young, who is pretty stiff.
There’s a reason why no one talks about her anymore. A really good and obvious
reason.
Although he’s not
in the film much, character actor Whit Bissell is fine as always in what in the
80s and 90s might’ve been called the Ronny Cox role. It’s a shame the role is
so small, because when you think about it, he’s basically the central villain,
not something Bissell normally got to play (if ever). Chuck Connors is
appropriately cast mainly for intimidating physical presence, whilst for once
Joseph Cotten’s positively suicidal demeanour works well for his cameo here. He
seemed awfully depressed (and glassy-eyed) at this point in his career. On a
good day, he was one of the most underrated actors of all-time, but the 70s and
early 80s didn’t see many good days for him. Dick Van Patten, meanwhile has
never been creepier than in his cameo here. Special mention must go to Edward
G. Robinson and Brock Peters. This, the last ever film appearance by the great
Robinson is not among his finest roles, but he does an excellent job with it. I
can’t decide whether his last scene is a brilliant way to go out on a top
career or positively ridiculous. Maybe both, but either way it sure is the
damndest thing, and ominously the last scene Robinson ever filmed. Brock Peters
and his frankly magnificent, deep voice is always good to see and hear, even if
he’s playing the John Shaft of the dystopian future society. Or at least the
‘angry black police boss’ of the dystopian future society. Really nice,
shadowy, low-level lighting by Richard H. Kline (“The Andromeda Strain”,
“Mandingo”, “Body Heat”) deserves singling out, too.
An interesting
and underrated sci-fi film that deals with issues that are still somewhat
relevant to today, actually. Like “Silent Running”, it’s a sci-fi film
with a social conscience. Some will find it heavy-handed, sure, but certainly
interesting. That said, it could’ve been a true classic if it had found a way
to tell its story without spilling the lentils and soya beans too early. That and
perhaps not designing its future society based on a then-current (but now
outdated) model. As is, though, it’s definitely worth a look. Don’t pay too
much attention to its mediocre reputation (though its box-office was fine). I
think it’s time for a re-appraisal of this one, it’s been the butt of jokes for
far too long already.
Rating: B-
Comments
Post a Comment