Review: Maggie
Set
in a near-future US where a virus called Necroambulism has slowly turned the
infected into zombies. Arnold Schwarzenegger plays a loving father who brings
his infected daughter Maggie (Abigail Breslin) back home to their Midwest farm.
He is warned that Maggie only has mere weeks left before she is completely
turned, and he is given advice on what to do when the time comes. The local
sheriff says that when the time comes, she will need to go into ‘quarantine’
like the rest, whilst a doctor/friend says he has three options; 1) Take her to
quarantine immediately, 2) Give her exactly what the doctors give her in
quarantine (said to be very painful) but allowing her to die at home, and 3)
End it now and quickly (a bullet to the head). Schwarzenegger tries his best to
prolong any kind of finality, seemingly unable to kill his own daughter, but
even more strongly refusing to let the doctors do it. This is his daughter,
changing or not. This will be his family’s
loss, and he wants it to happen on his terms
as best he can manage it. He tries to create a sense of normalcy for the time
being, which his current wife (Joely Richardson) valiantly tries to support him
in, to great strain on her nerves (She obviously cares for young Maggie, but is
understandably frightened of her).
Although
the combination of Arnold Schwarzenegger and zombies might sound like classic
stuff, I can actually understand why this 2015 flick from director Henry Hobson
(a credits designer of all things, in his directorial debut) bypassed cinemas
in Australia. Arnold isn’t the star he used to be, for one thing. Action movies
(which this film isn’t, mind you) have moved on without him. And then you watch
the film and realise that it’s a rather arty, brooding, rather morose
drama…with zombies. Starring Arnold freakin’ Schwarzenegger. However, it’s
because I’ve seen the film that I can honestly say that I believe the reason
why this film was released direct-to-DVD in Australia and flopped in the US is
more to do with how difficult it is to market the film, rather than its
quality. I actually liked the film. Yes, there’s way too many arty shots of
Arnie standing contemplatively in a field, and yes I did question why what
happened at the end didn’t happen earlier if it were a viable option. However,
I really dug just how different this film was, not just for a zombie movie, but
for an Arnold Schwarzenegger movie. The closest approximation I can come up
with is John Hillcoat’s “The Road”.
Like
“End of Days”, Arnie’s trying to genuinely act in this one, and like
that film he acquits himself well. It’s definitely his best performance since
returning to movies, and possibly his best performance to date. He’s actually
quite pensive and sensitive in this, and if he looks noticeably older and seems
tired, it’s appropriate for his character and the very grave situation he is
in. Abigail Breslin is quite good too in a role that could easily have become
silly. Joely Richardson, meanwhile, gives her best performance in years as a
very nervous and conflicted character.
Scripted
by the uber-pretentiously named John Scott 3 (Yep, you read that correctly),
it’s a sad film, a harrowing and dour film that will certainly divide people.
It could’ve gone so horribly wrong and been subject to jeers and laughter because
it dares to take its fantastical subject very seriously, but not in a mopey,
wet-mouthed tweeny-bop sparkly emo vampire way. It’s actually quite a brave
film, if you ask me, with a really interesting solemnity to it. The tone is
visualised by the film’s overall bleak look captured by cinematographer Lukas
Ettlin (atoning for his sins with the awful and incompetently shot “Battle:
Los Angeles”). It’s not quite as atmospheric as “The Road”, but
there’s some really amazing shots of grey Midwestern scenery. I just wish that
there were a few less of those arty shots. We get the point pretty damn
quickly, thanks.
Arnold
produced the film, so I hope he didn’t lose money on it, because I think it’s a
pretty worthy film. It definitely deserves to be more widely seen, and I was
shocked- shocked!, that Lionsgate were the ones who released it. They have such
a good track record in releasing horror-themed films, don’t they? Most of you
have probably never even heard of it. But that’s the way it is today, films get
lost or hushed away in the corner (or Direct to-DVD/VOD) when it’s not so easy
to properly categorise them. Although more horrific in some ways than many
horror films you’ll see, this is more drama than horror or action movie.
I
hope Mr. Hobson doesn’t become another Kerry Conran (the underrated “Sky
Captain and the World of Tomorrow”) or John Patrick Kelley (“The
Locusts”, also underrated) and actually gets to continue directing films
after this rather unpopular but underrated film. It won’t be for everyone, but
I enjoyed its uniqueness and ambition. Give it a go if you can find it, you
might find yourself pleasantly surprised.
Rating:
B-
Comments
Post a Comment