Review: Silent Hill: Revelation
Sean Bean and his
daughter Adelaide Clemens have moved towns several times over the last 6 years
for reasons she doesn’t quite understand. However, she’s about to find out, as
private detective Martin Donovan catches hold of her and explains that he has been
hired to find her. He knows her real name, and says that she is supposed to
come to a place called Silent Hill. Spooked, Clemens and new school chum Kit
Harington (in his film debut) head home from school to see her dad, only to
find that he is gone, and the words ‘Come to Silent Hill’ are written in blood
on the walls. So it’s off to Silent Hill they go, a dreamscape place where
demons and monsters, and insane Malcolm McDowell live. An unrecognisable
Carrie-Ann Moss turns up as the chief villainess of the piece, whilst Deborah
Kara Unger and Radha Mitchell briefly reprise their roles from the first film.
Although I’m not
really a gamer (certainly haven’t played anything in about a decade at least),
I nearly took a liking to the film adaptation of “Silent Hill”, and this
2012 sequel from writer-director Michael J. Bassett (the similarly OK “Solomon
Kane” and the genuinely underrated “Wilderness”) isn’t so inferior
as to require a lesser rating. You could do a helluva lot worse in the video
game adaptation subgenre than these atmospheric, visually pleasing flicks, even
if neither quite makes it into ‘good movie’ territory. Bloody close both times,
though.
We don’t get off
to a terribly auspicious start here. Although we get what looks like a Cenobite
version of a merry-go-round, it’s followed up with one of cinema’s oldest
clichés. Even more annoying than the ‘It was just a dream’ cliché, is the ‘It
was just a dream…no wait, it wasn’t!...or maybe it was, Haha!’ cliché. I hate
that shit right there. Meanwhile, Radha Mitchell returns in ghostly (i.e.
Contrived) form to pretty much set up the film’s plot, unnecessarily I might
add, in a scene set between the events of the first film and the beginning of
this film’s plot. Confused? Yeah. However, I did like the casting of perennial
pervert Martin Donovan as a character who is really only creepy and suspicious
because he’s played by Donovan, and who may just be a red herring.
Like the first
film, this is a good-looking, fog-enveloped nightmare of a film. Meanwhile,
aside from the unnecessary involvement from Mitchell, the set-up to this
actually isn’t uninteresting. It might remind you a little of an “Elm St.”
sequel as the survivors of the previous film realise they can’t quite escape
the nightmare. As with last time, there’s lots of cool, creepy imagery, and
this one’s actually surprisingly gory at times too (You’ll get faint “Hellraiser”
echoes at times). Lead actress and Michelle Williams doppelganger Adelaide
Clemens (If you’re an Aussie, why would you name your child after one of our
own states? Poor thing!) is pretty damn good in the lead role, easily the best
actor in the entire film. A pre-“Game of Thrones” Kit Harington proves
here that he knows nothing about American accents, though to be fair Sean Bean
does about as good a job of it himself. Bean, by the way, has almost as much of
an expository function in this film as does Mitchell. He’s just there to fill
in the necessary narrative gaps and provide in his final scene the most
shameless set-up for a second sequel that I’ve ever seen. Malcolm McDowell
doesn’t do what I’d consider GOOD acting here, but he’s having a ball and makes
for an amusing loon. Carrie-Ann Moss is no Alice Krige, however, by a long
stretch.
What really
bothered me about the film is the same main flaw the original had: After a
while it becomes a whole lot of walking around, so that the creepy visuals and
atmosphere are the chief pleasures, and after a while that sees the film lose
you a bit. It’s the same ‘ol thing with a predominantly new cast. Not bad, not
good, it has much more visual imagination than narrative imagination. That
carries it somewhat, and the gore helps too.
The atmosphere
and creepy visuals kept me more interested in this than I was expecting. Lead
actress Adelaide Clemens impresses, and the film’s a lot better than it has any
right to be. I mean, it’s not “Doom”, OK? That counts for something
doesn’t it? Just shy of a recommendation, however.
Rating: C+
Comments
Post a Comment