Review: The Left-Handed Gun
A
re-telling of the story of William H. Bonney, AKA Billy the Kid (Paul Newman)
who becomes embittered and violent when his mentor, genteel rancher Tunstall
(Colin Keith-Johnston) is gunned down by a sheriff’s posse (one being corrupt
Sheriff Brady himself), working for an intimidating rancher named Morton. Billy
makes it his mission to hunt down Tunstall’s killers and get revenge, aided by
two of Tunstall’s men, Charlie Bowdre (James Congdon) and Tom O’Foliard (James
Best). The latter two are somewhat in over their heads however, as Billy is
much more violently motivated than they are, shocking even hero-worshipping
writer Moultrie (Hurd Hatfield). Complications arise when Billy’s new ally Pat
Garrett (John Dehner) tires of his friend’s gun-happy ways and (after Billy
breaks an amnesty) finally decides to give in to the demand that he become
sheriff, setting up a showdown between the two pals. John Dierkes plays
Tunstall’s loyal business partner McSween.
Although
30+ year old Paul Newman is clearly too old to play a guy who died aged 21, he
gives one of his more interesting early performances in this rather grim 1958
western from debut film director Arthur Penn (“Little Big Man”, “Bonnie
and Clyde”). Scripted by Leslie Stevens (whose play The Lovers was turned into the 1965 film “The War Lord”)
from a teleplay by an apparently disgruntled Gore Vidal (“Ben-Hur”, “I
Accuse”), the only major issue with the film (aside from playing extremely
fast and loose with known facts to say the least) is that it’s way too much
story to be telling in one 99 minute film. “Young Guns” had to tell it
in two 90 odd minute films. An hour
into a 90ish minute film is simply too late for Pat Garrett to still not be
appointed sheriff, as it leaves Penn and Stevens having to rush things in the
final half-hour.
In
the role of Garrett, it must be said that John Dehner is the screen’s
best-ever, much as James Coburn (who played him in “Pat Garrett and Billy
the Kid”) is one of my favourite actors of all-time. It’s not even close,
with all due respect to Coburn, Patrick Wayne (“Young Guns”), and
William L. Petersen (“Young Guns II”). I never quite got Petersen’s take
on the character, as he came off as a smug prick who never seemed credible as a
former ally to Billy. At least with Coburn in “Pat Garrett and Billy the
Kid” the rather antagonistic relationship between the two fit in with the
tone of the entire film. As for pale-eyed Dehner, his Garrett is given stronger
motivation for siding against Billy than was Petersen (who seemed to be
portraying Garrett as vain without any context for it). In this outing, Garrett
is a decent, peace-loving man who used to be a bit of a scallywag. He
sympathises with Billy and agrees to hide him, but when Billy starts shooting
it up at his wedding and breaks the amnesty, Garrett draws a line in the sand.
That makes much more sense than Garrett simply being an ambitious and
glory-seeking dickhead.
Also
impressing is the always sturdy John Dierkes in a supporting turn as McSween,
the lawyer character Terry O’Quinn brilliantly portrayed in “Young Guns”.
Lantern-jawed character actor Dierkes is a tower of quiet strength and decency,
as the Bonney ally, stealing his every scene. Roscoe P. Coltrane himself, James
Best is an appropriately dumb hick Tom O’Foliard (there’s a bit of Roscoe in
the performance), if a bit underused, as is his “Dukes of Hazzard”
co-star Denver Pyle as one of Garrett’s posse. James Congdon doesn’t get a lot
to do as Charlie Bowdre (later immortalised by the underrated Casey Siemaszko
in “Young Guns”), but his final scene is actually quite harrowing. As
for Mr. Newman, inappropriate in age or not (and let’s face it, Tunstall was
meant to be in his mid-20s and every
film gets that one way wrong!), he
gives a suitably taciturn, revenge-minded characterisation of the famed
youthful outlaw. I think Emilio Estevez better conveyed Billy’s somewhat
psychotic, trigger-happy side, but Newman is fine in his own way, too, one of
his better early performances before his career really took off.
The
one weak link in the cast is clearly Hurd Hatfield, whose character Moultrie is
perhaps meant to be a blind hero-worshipper who gradually sees the disturbed
man he has turned into a myth. Unfortunately, the oily way Hatfield portrays
the character is so incredibly bizarre and mannered, that he’s inappropriately
creepy and seems somehow sinister. He strikes every wrong note and stands out
like a sore thumb in an otherwise excellent cast. Definitely worth commending
is the stark, stunningly beautiful B&W cinematography by Peverell Marley (“Night and Day”, “The
Greatest Show on Earth”), a highlight of the film for sure. Deaths in this
film really seem differently handled to any western prior, and it’s one of the
film’s chief strengths. It’s a bit more shocking, uglier, and more pronounced
than most westerns before it.
Even
though this is in many ways a traditional B-western, there’s an extra kick in
the guts that, combined with some very good performances, elevate the film into
something of a minor classic. It’s chief flaw (aside from perhaps the title
being based on a dispelled myth) is covering a lot of material later seen in
the “Young Guns” films, but with only 99 minutes, it does so too quickly
and in not quite enough detail. Still an interesting, brooding, and stark film
well worth re-discovery.
Rating:
B
Comments
Post a Comment