Review: Armageddon
A
giant asteroid has been discovered headed for Earth, and in all likelihood, if
it hits, the asteroid will win. NASA administrator Dan Truman (Billy Bob
Thornton) has the idea to hire Harry Stamper (Bruce Willis) and his team of oil
riggers, train them to go into orbit, land on the asteroid (!) in order to do
their thing drilling to the core so that a nuclear weapon can be stuffed in it
and detonated. The asteroid will split in two and neither part will make it to
Earth. That’s the plan, at least. Meanwhile, Stamper’s daughter Grace has been
seeing driller A.J. (Ben Affleck) behind Harry’s back, and Harry’s not remotely
happy about that. The rest of Harry’s rowdy team are played by Steve Buscemi (a
gambling addict and sleazeoid), Michael Clarke Duncan, Owen Wilson (as a cowboy
who becomes a ‘space cowboy’), Will Patton (as a divorcee with a kid who
doesn’t know him), and Ken Campbell. Jason Isaacs plays a NASA science guy,
William Fichtner is an a-hole legit astronaut, Peter Stormare is a loopy
cosmonaut, Judith Hoag is Patton’s ex-wife, and Eddie Griffin was hopefully
well-paid for his 30 seconds as ‘black guy gon’ die first even though this
isn’t a horror movie’.
Of
the two asteroid movies from 1998, this big ‘ol mess of dumb arse from director
Michael Bay (“Bad Boys”, “The Rock”, the “Transformers”
franchise) falls well, well short of the clichéd, but much more humanistic “Deep
Impact”. There’s some big-arse names in this one, especially the cast:
Bruce Willis, Ben Affleck, Billy Bob Thornton, Draco Malfoy (Jason Isaacs), Mr.
Cooper (Mark Curry) playing a cabbie, and Chuck Heston narrates the bloody
thing. With the screenplay being written by Jonathan Hensleigh (“Jumanji”,
“Die Hard With a Vengeance”), J.J. Abrams (creator of TV’s “Lost”
and director of the current cinematic incarnations of “Star Wars” and “Star
Trek”), Tony Gilroy (writer-director of “Duplicity” and “Michael
Clayton”), and Shane Salerno (who co-wrote the “Shaft” remake), and
with Gale Ann Hurd (“The Terminator”, “Aliens”) and Jerry
Bruckheimer (“Beverly Hills Cop”, “Top Gun”, “The Rock”)
producing it, you’d think the film would be a lot worthier than it is. Sadly,
it’s the least urgent crisis Earth has ever faced, thanks to Bay’s dumb arse,
over-extended, overly jocular, and snail’s pace approach. The end of the world
is apparently approaching, and yet the mission to avert disaster only commences
one hour into the film! Then when it does finally properly start, you realise
Bay and his screenwriters haven’t got a clue what to do. So the sweet and
lovely Liv Tyler’s role simply becomes to react, shout and cry, and the mission
itself plays out absolutely tediously. Sure, all the lead up was time-wasting,
but the rest is incredibly dull! It’s really quite a poor film all-round. I
said that the film is far too jocular, but the comedy itself isn’t actually
bad. It’s just that there’s too much of it and it isn’t necessary. It ends up
ruining the seriousness and urgency of the situation, and I think that might be
a big part of the reason why the mission scenes are so dull: I no longer gave a
fuck.
Charlton
Heston is the absolute right guy to be narrating the opening of this film,
great voice and a perfect decision. The subsequent idiotic titles design that
explode and fly around the screen are incredibly stupid, however. The opening
sequence is effectively ridiculous Irwin Allen-esque disaster movie stuff. In
fact, anytime the film does focus on the devastation and destruction- which is
all too rare- it’s on sure footing. Bay knows how to ‘splode stuff real good,
and he gets in early too. Then the film takes a fucking nap for an hour while
the cast yap, yuk it up, and play with animal crackers (in one of the worst
romantic scenes of all-time). The 18 day deadline to Armageddon may only be
about two hours of screen time, but it feels like an eternity whilst everyone
dicks around and Bay shoots military hardware at sunset shots Ad nauseum. The
guy has too much of a boner for military hardware and training sequences. It’s
what killed “Top Gun” and is even worse here. And don’t even get me
started on Liv Tyler having a big-arse American flag behind her as the shuttle
takes off. Ugh, it’s almost (but not quite) as bad as the damn animal crackers
love scene with Affleck. Speaking of pretentious (not to mention uber-macho),
the film lays it on way too thick about these roughneck drillers. Blue-collar
work is entirely necessary and worthy, but the film’s portrayal of these guys
as big heroes (even before they go into space) as essentially ‘the best of the
best of the rest of what’s left’ is overkill. Painting Willis’ particular team
as the one and only group of guys capable of this job is, even for a made-up
disaster film, absurd to infinity and beyond. The macho roll-call scene here
was previously done a lot more entertainingly in “Con Air”, though it’s
always nice to see Shawnee Smith.
I’m
not going to deny that Bruce Willis, Liv Tyler, and Ben Affleck are somewhat
well-cast, however it’s a complete waste of the talents of the latter two in
particular. Ben Affleck has been used very effectively in movies over the years
(“Boiler Room”, “Changing Lanes”, “Good Will Hunting”, “Gone
Girl”, the underrated “The Sum of All Fears”), but playing the
callow young romantic lead here just isn’t worth his time or effort, and he
certainly doesn’t give it his best. I’ve never understood the hate for Ben
Affleck, but he’s insanely annoying in this. Affleck can do much more than play
a simple Himbo like this, and the character arc for these three characters is
an eye-roller. Apparently the romantic subplot is the uncredited work of Scott
Rosenberg (“Beautiful Girls”, “Con Air”, “High Fidelity”),
who really ought to know better. Also annoying is Steve Buscemi. Part of it is
his deliberately annoying character who starts to lose his mind. However, it’s
mostly just that as much as I love the guy, Steve Buscemi doesn’t belong here.
I know he’s a former fireman and he returned to duty on 9/11, but I don’t much
buy him as a roughneck, and I sure as shit don’t buy him as a roughneck who
gets to go into space. In a stupid movie with no credibility, Buscemi gives it
even less. In fact, the late Michael Clarke Duncan seems more plausible, and
I’m still not sure how they found a spacesuit to fit the guy! That was one big
dude right there.
The
only one who brings any genuine credibility and seriousness to the film is
Billy Bob Thornton in the rather functionary role of a NASA Executive Director,
who hires Willis’ team. He deserves way better than he’s given, and is the only
one here who seems to realise that there’s a potentially world-ending disaster
at hand. He effortlessly walks off with the whole film simply by not being
corny. That’s especially amazing given he apparently did the film for the
money. Meanwhile, Peter Stormare turns up as a Russian cosmonaut and plays him
exactly as you’d expect. Since the film already has too much comic relief, what
it really needs is Serious Relief (i.e. Drama). Instead we get Udo Kier as a
bemused shrink during a cute but completely time-wasting psych/medical exam
sequence. Owen Wilson is alternately amusing and annoying (and very Owen
Wilson), but Grace Zabriskie has an amusing early cameo, and I did get a laugh
out of baritone Michael Clarke Duncan singing ‘Leaving on a Jet Plane’. Like I
said, there’s just too much comedy at
the expense of drama and tension.
It’s
also loud, seriously loud. Obnoxious, actually, and one of the loudest movies
you’ll ever see (along with “Batman Forever”). Having said that, next to
Billy Bob Thornton, the best thing about the film is its kick-arse, if random
soundtrack. Forget Aerosmith’s wet, pop-rock power ballad ‘Don’t Wanna Miss a
Thing’, they also play ‘Sweet Emotion’, and we also get Curtis Mayfield’s
‘Pusher Man’ during a scene that it makes no sense to play such a song (during
the riggers’ medical exams), but who cares? It’s a great song, and there’s
other fine songs throughout, too.
Y’know,
if Bay ever got himself a really good screenplay, he might one day make a
terrific film. “Pain & Gain” wasn’t bad, and although his imagery
can be frequently eye-rolling, he certainly can paint a pretty picture, and
does so here on occasion. However, most of his films have awful screenplays and
are in dire need of an editor, and that’s certainly the case with this one. The
devastation and destruction is fun, but there’s not enough of it in a film that
has way too much of everything else except good screenwriting. A big, dumb,
long (too long) and slow film that torpedoes its own story by failing to take a
damn thing seriously or hurry the hell up. Kinda like “The Rock” really,
but thankfully free of Nic Cage.
Rating:
C
Comments
Post a Comment