Review: Maximum Conviction
‘Stone
Cold’ Steve Austin and Steven Seagal play a couple of tough guy security
contractors (and former CIA guys) overseeing the impending closure of a
SuperMax military prison. It was supposed to be an easy gig, but the arrival of
a couple of female prisoners (Aliyah O’Brien and Steph Song) for a temporary
stay puts a spanner or two in the works. Along come a bunch of heavily armed
mercenaries led by supposed Marshal Michael Paré who aren’t quite on the level
and are in need of something Song is apparently in possession of. He holds the
cowardly warden (Ian Robison) hostage, and has absolutely no problems murdering
the fuck out of anyone who gets in his way. By the way, the mercenaries get
smuggled in a truck hilariously labelled ‘Troy Disposal Services’. Yeah, I see
what you did there. Whilst Austin is stuck somewhere inside the prison to fend
for himself, Seagal and his other co-workers (including Bren Foster) had left
to go drinking, and arrive back to see that the fit has hit the shan. Once
Seagal and his team are reunited with Austin, they attempt to take the bad guys
down. Oh, then there’s the prisoners…yeah, you just know the two female
prisoners are gonna be targeted by the male inmates at some point.
Directed
by Keoni Waxman (Seagal’s not-bad “The Keeper” and Steve Austin’s “Hunt
to Kill”), this 2012 action/thriller suffers greatly from one of its stars
being so fat and lazy that almost everyone else involved in the film has to
work overtime to compensate. Yeah, I’m calling Steven Seagal out, and it’s not
for the first time, but this is clearly the most egregious example of Seagal’s
lack of giveashit in his work. He’s not the only one slumming here, but he’s
the biggest by far, and not just in girth. Since Seagal can no longer do all of
the things he was once able to do, and because he’s also seemingly unwilling to
even try his best, he’s not really in the film very much despite sharing the
lead with wrestling legend ‘Stone Cold’ Steve Austin. It results in Seagal
delegating a lot to other actors, but even when he does involve himself in the
action scenes, said action scenes are full of ADHD editing, lots of incoherent
close-ups, and the occasional shaky-cam. While it looks like Seagal doesn’t
employ body doubles this time (or at least not as often), the way the fights
are filmed you kinda have to take it on good faith that Seagal has beaten
someone up. It’s a mixture of impressionism and Seagal’s prior reputation
rather than anything you genuinely see with your own eyes. Mr. Austin, on the
other hand proves with a single punch to be more convincing in a fight, without
the need for fancy editing or obscuring camera angles. Yes, Austin is used to
making the unreal (but usually still with some impact) ‘sport’ of professional
wrestling look somewhat real, but c’mon, Seagal’s a legit Aikido expert in
real-life, right? It just ain’t right. He needs to do either one of two things;
1) Start to give an actual shit about acting, or 2) Lose some goddamn pounds
already! And no, retirement isn’t a third option, dude’s gotta earn a living
and he sure as shit isn’t gonna make bread as a country and western singer.
Take
out Seagal and replace him with the perfectly capable Bren Foster (An
English-born Aussie with a martial arts background who sadly doesn’t get much
of a chance to display his martial arts skills, but certainly appears to
possess them), and the film is significantly improved. As is, it’s a bit
underwhelming, if far from Seagal’s worst. Austin will never be accused of
being an actor (nor a great technical wrestler, if we’re being honest), but he does
convince as an ornery sonofabitch who can beat people up, and since that’s
mostly what is required of him here (especially the former) he’s quite
enjoyable. When something more than ‘ornery guy who takes no shit and gives no
fucks’ is required of him as an actor, such as his comradery with Seagal, he’s
on far less sure footing. In fact, not only do he and Seagal not have much
chemistry, Seagal comes off slightly less forced in those scenes together than
Austin.
The
film itself is fairly standard terrorist-thriller stuff, albeit a bit
slower-moving than most because the plot has lots of moving parts that need to
be put into place. Even “Die Hard”, the classic model for this sort of
thing, needed time to set everything up and wasn’t any lesser for it. This
isn’t “Die Hard” in terms of quality, though. That film had energy and a
certain snap to it that this film, made by lesser hands simply can’t provide.
Composer Michael Richard Plowman does try his best, though, to liven things up
with a fine music score. Getting back to the acting, it’s a shame that in a
film starring two virtual non-actors who mostly get by on some level of
presence/charisma/reputation the chief villain they face off against is played
by Michael Paré, who has more acting talent than either Seagal or Austin but is
every bit as lazy as the former. He managed to get by on his rugged good looks
and a small percentage of charisma in Walter Hill’s excellent “Streets of
Fire”, which appropriately cast him as a kind of 50s-era rebel turned comic
book figure. Ever since then, he’s failed to give even a hint of a shit about
his work, from all on-screen evidence. Here I think it’s a mistake to put one
of the more wooden leading men of the 1980s against the likes of Seagal and
Austin. I actually think it’s the lesser known actors in the cast (or at least
some of them) who offer up the more impressive work, Foster in particular might
just have a future ahead of him if he turns the right heads (He’s also appeared
in “The Last Ship” and TV’s long-running “Days of Our Lives”, but
I think action movies are where his potential mostly lies). Here he doesn’t get
to spin kick the fuck out of someone until about ten minutes to go, which is
unfortunate. Pair him with Austin, send Seagal to a personal trainer, and
you’ve got yourself a better film for sure. Scripted by Richard Beattie (“Absolution”
with Seagal, and several instalments of his “True Justice” series), the
main reason the film ends up (barely) watchable is because the basic plot will
almost always be somewhat watchable, even if this is far from the best of its
type.
Rating:
C+
Comments
Post a Comment