Review: Red Scorpion
Dolph Lundgren
plays Nikolai, a dutiful Russian special forces soldier tasked with
infiltrating and destroying an Anti-Commie rebellion in an African nation by
killing its leader. When he gets there, though, he sees what those on his side
of the fence are doing and he just can’t stomach it. He ends up helping out the
other side and squaring off with brutal Cuban General Zayas (played by American
Carmen Argenziano) and Nikolai’s own superior General Vortek (played by Brit
T.P. McKenna). Al White plays one of the African rebels, Brion James a thuggish
Russian soldier, and M. Emmet Walsh an Anti-Commie journo from America,
covering the story.
In the late 80s,
someone decided to try and turn Swedish-born actor and martial artist (and
chemical engineer!) Dolph Lundgren into an action hero. He was certainly the
right guy for “Masters of the Universe”, but this 1989 attempt at a
Soviet “First Blood” from director Joseph Zito is pretty well below par.
You’ll be shocked to learn that it’s not a Canon Group actioner. It certainly
has the look and quality of one.
Lundgren has
always been a lot more fun in villainous roles (“Universal Soldier” in
particular), and casting him as a Russian special forces guy who develops a
conscience is not a very good fit for him. In and of itself, the character is
interesting, but Lundgren is singularly and spectacularly unappealing in
performance whenever he isn’t kicking someone’s arse. At first his brute, blunt
force demeanour is amusing, but it isn’t interesting enough to carry an entire
film that isn’t exactly action-packed. In fact, it’s probably his worst and
most robotic performance to date. Lundgren’s superiors want him to be a ‘perfect killing machine’, but is meant by the
filmmakers to be an independent thinker. Lundgren plays the character…as a
perfect killing machine, an obvious cock-up. A big black hole of charisma for a
protagonist really weighs this thing down, as Lundgren just isn’t equipped for
such a role. Sly Stallone is no master thesp, but playing a damaged and disillusioned
former soldier pushed to the brink by an ignorant and pushy sheriff in “First
Blood”, he was actually quite strong.
Lundgren really
only works in the action scenes, which are fun, but few and far between. In
action mode, Lundgren’s actually a lot of fun, even engaging in a bit of
martial arts. However, the film really only has two memorable scenes. The first
is an extremely uncomfortable torture scene that seems like the most painful
acupuncture session of all-time. It’s ricockulous, but you will wince. The other memorable moment is at the climax where a
certain someone loses an arm with a grenade still attached to it. That was
really clever…or dumb. It was definitely something. For the most part, the film
isn’t much of anything, with Lundgren’s midway trek out in the African desert
with his literally spear-throwing native pal particularly interminable. Zito’s
biggest problem as a director here is complete lack of affinity for pacing.
This thing is painfully slow-moving, which for an action movie is terminal. The
dreadfully clichéd music score by Jay Chattaway is no help either, I’m afraid.
It’s very stock-standard, cheapo action movie score stuff (not unlike
Chattaway’s score for the abysmal “Invasion USA”), typically drum-heavy
(And what’s with all the Little Richard on the soundtrack? I love ‘Long Tall
Sally’, but c’mon…). I think I even heard a fucking pan flute at one point. A
pan flute! When you add in the fact that there’s not nearly enough action, it
makes for really dull viewing. Zito’s abysmal “Invasion USA” might be
the weaker film, but this film certainly shows the director was a better horror
director (His “Friday the 13th: The Beginning” was the
original series’ mild best, and “The Prowler” also wasn’t bad) than
action director by far.
Culturally, no
one comes out of this looking good. Russians, Cubans, and Africans are all
painted in really rank racial stereotypes, even for this sort of thing (Even
Walsh makes Americans seem like loudmouthed, racist jerks). Personally I think
the film was pretty outdated for a Commie Russia action pic by the time it came
out, even “Red Heat” and “Rambo III” were pushing it a bit.
Positing it from the point of view of a Russkie isn’t enough of a difference to
matter. The not remotely Cuban actor Carmen Argenziano (who looks alarmingly
like genre villain Michael Ironside, but with none of the menace) is an
appallingly unthreatening villain. When neither the hero nor the villain are up
to snuff, you’re in real trouble. Neither M. Emmet Walsh nor the late Brion
James do what I would call good
acting here (and James’ Russian accent is horrendous), but they are a lot more
fun than anything else in this underwhelming B-grade (to be polite) action
flick. Walsh in particular looks like he’s having a whale of a time, but one
wonders how in the hell such a popular character actor ended up in something
like this.
Feeling like an
unused “Rambo” script crudely re-written to include a non-conformist
Russian protagonist (played by a Swede), this is pretty lousy stuff for only
the least demanding of 80s action movie fans. Even then you might be
disappointed with how little action there is. The hero and villain are miscast,
the script is offensive and clichéd, and the whole thing moves slower than a
snail’s place. Scripted by Arne Olsen (whose stellar resumé includes “All Dogs Go to Heaven 2”, “Cop
and a ½” and “Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: The Movie”), from a
story by Olsen, and the team of Jack and Robert Abramoff (who both produced the
film and never wrote again), Zito himself also had an uncredited hand in
re-writing the film.
Rating: D+
Comments
Post a Comment