Review: Ted 2
Ted (voiced by
Peter Griffin) has married his love Tammy Lynn (Jessica Barth), and when we
pick things up, the fit has hit the shan and the situation looks like a
domestic scene from a Martin Scorsese movie (I’m pretty sure the shaky cam
style was meant to evoke “Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore” or “Raging
Bull”). Ted wants them to have a baby to save their marriage, despite not
having the right anatomy for such a thing to be possible. So they try adoption,
only for their application to raise red flags for the U.S. government, who for
some reason only now decide that Ted is not, in fact, a person. Therefore he
can’t adopt children, he can’t keep his job, and even his marriage to
Tammy-Lynn is stripped of its legitimacy and annulled. That’s when Ted and his
‘Thunder Buddy’ John (Mark Wahlberg) decide to act on this and fight for Ted’s
right to be considered a person (Never mind that not only is he a toy, but he’s
also a bear…you’re not meant to think about that. Or think at all). They hire
young, pretty stoner lawyer Samantha (Amanda Seyfried), who really wishes they
could get the help of top civil rights lawyer Patrick Meighan (Morgan
Freeman!). Meanwhile, weirdo loser Donny, a janitor for Hasbro, plots a scheme
to get possession of Ted, now that he’s not currently considered to be a
‘person’, and tries to get the help of Hasbro bigwig Mr. Jessup (John Carroll
Lynch).
I’m not a “Family
Guy” fan and didn’t think the first “Ted” was terribly good, either.
I knew right from the opening credits sequence that this 2015 sequel from
director/co-writer Seth MacFarlane (“Ted”, “A Million Ways to Die in
the West”) was going to be even worse. All I really liked about the first
film was the random and hilarious “Flash Gordon” references. This one
opens with Sam J. Jones once again playing a bizarro version of himself, but
this time I wasn’t laughing. Couple that with the fact that Ted is essentially
a furry Peter Griffin and MacFarlane gets his Busby-Berkeley on in the tedious
credits sequence, and yeah…this just isn’t for me. For every amusing bit like
the Liam Neeson cameo, there’s MacFarlane making a lame gay joke about Jay
Leno…and Leno turns up to take part in it and sully himself in my eyes even
further than that whole debacle with Conan. Meanwhile, please America, will you
stop putting your national sports heroes in films? 9 times out of 10, no one
outside of America knows who these people are, nor do we care. 25 minutes and
one Tom Brady cameo into the film and I was finding this seriously desperate,
embarrassing, and mostly unfunny. When Amanda Seyfried turned up as a ‘cool’
lawyer (i.e. She smokes dope from a bong), I realised I was in for a bit of a
slog.
Every now and
then there’d be an amusing moment; A discussion about F. Scott Fitzgerald’s
first name, Seyfried being compared to Gollum, “SNL” alum Kate McKinnon
doing a dead-on impersonation of Seyfried, a cute gag on the casting of
Superman with an unlikely choice, or Giovanni Ribisi once again turning up and
being creepy as hell. The scene where Patrick Warburton and Michael Dorn dress
as cut-rate cosplay versions of their most famous TV sci-fi/superhero
characters at ComicCon, is a cute gag too. I also liked the scene where Ted and
Wahlberg heckle an improv comedy troupe by suggesting completely inappropriate (and
virtually impossible) topics. However, the biggest laugh comes in a scene
involving Ted, Ribisi, and a certain Neil Diamond song that everyone knows the
words to.
For the most
part, though, it was a miss for me. There’s way too many stretches of zero
laughs, and to be honest, there’s way too much Ted and way too little Wahlberg,
who becomes a passive observer essentially in this film. At the very least
there’s too much Ted and too few laughs. It’s probably entirely the point, but
I thought even for a film about a magically talking bear, that the film’s plot
was infantile and stupid. On a TV show, especially an animated one, stupidity
and lame plotting aren’t so difficult to deal with, but since this wasn’t
particularly funny, I found myself rolling my eyes a lot in regards to the
story.
As with the first
film, this is probably the exact film Seth MacFarlane wanted to make. He and
his fans will be pleased with it. My tolerance for MacFarlane is limited to some
of the movie parodies on “Family Guy” and his ‘We Saw Your Boobs’ song
at the Oscars (It was crude and shameless, but so random I couldn’t help
laughing). This, I don’t really get, and it’s even less funny than the first
film. I like crude humour, but only if there’s some smarts to go along with it.
“South Park” and Billy Connolly spring to mind. Seth, for me, has never
gotten that balance right and certainly doesn’t get it right here. MacFarlane
co-wrote with Alex Sulkin and Wellesley Wild (his cronies from “Family Guy”
and “Ted”), the latter of whom sounds like he should be the lead
character in a sitcom about an acerbic British butler.
Rating: C
Comments
Post a Comment