Review: Out for Justice
Steven Seagal
plays a streetwise cop named Gino Felino who gets all wrist snap-happy when the
old Brooklyn neighbourhood goes to seed, and especially when his partner is
gunned down. A maverick cop who doesn’t much care for rules (he cares about
puppies, though!), he spends all of his time and energy on bringing down the
short-fused Richie (William Forsythe), another kid from the neighbourhood grown
up and gone bad. Like, ‘shoot a woman in broad daylight’ crack-smoking psycho.
That kind of ‘gone bad’. Hell, even the Mafia think the guy’s too much. Jerry
Orbach plays Gino’s superior officer, Gina Gershon is Richie’s club owner
sister who is afraid of him.
Not one of Steven
Seagal’s crowning achievements, but this 1991 John Flynn (“The Outfit”, “Rolling
Thunder”, “Lock Up”) action flick plays better in hindsight. Seagal
would go on to make much worse than this film (“On Deadly Ground”, “The
Foreigner”, “Out For a Kill”), which at least has its moments.
Scripted by David Lee Henry (“Road House”, “8 Million Ways to Die”),
it is, however, pretty forgettable in the grand scheme of things. It’s like a
lesser version of Seagal’s starring debut “Above the Law”, which I
always thought of as a Chuck Norris vehicle without Chuck Norris. If you like
your cops with mob ties flicks, you might get more out of it than I did, but
for me it was a bit boring. “Hard to Kill” and “Under Siege” it
most certainly is not. It also has more uses and permutations of the word
‘fuck’ (114 according to IMDb) than some Billy Connolly concerts I’ve seen.
The biggest
issues with the film involve the Forsythe character. Forsythe is a good actor
given no choice here but to act out the most reckless and over-the-top bad guy
in damn near cinematic history. As written, the role is awfully hammy and
Forsythe just has to roll with it. The film wants to give the impression that
the Forsythe and Seagal characters have been connected since childhood.
However, outside of Seagal’s character being close to Forsythe’s parents, no
sense of that connection or relationship is seen in the film, and it hurts the
film greatly as a result. I mean, were they friends or just two guys from the
same hood who ended up on different paths? I was never really sure.
The supporting
cast is full of well-known faces (you’ll get to see what Julianna Margulies
looked like in 1991 if you’re one of the two people who give a flying crap
about her), but Orbach and Gershon are the standouts. Neither is in the film
nearly enough (and apparently John Leguizamo is in here too but I strangely
never spotted him), and Orbach is really just playing Orbach, but they’re
watchable whenever on screen. Gershon gets more time than Orbach and is a most
underrated talent. Hell, she’s the only actor to come out of “Showgirls”
with only a minor covering of excrement on her.
Overall, this is
a dull and clichéd film with really only one thing going for it: Seagal in
Action. This is probably Seagal’s most violent film, along with “Marked For
Death”. Donning a goofy Curtis Sliwa beret, Seagal’s a lot thinner in the
face here than he’d become (but he was never skinny- look back at his early
films, people!), and is more motivated than in just about any other film since.
Perhaps that’s not saying much, but an early fight in a butcher’s shop shows
just what this film could’ve been- Seagal snapping limbs, using baseball bats
and even what looks like a salami as a weapon. It’s an awesome,
painful-sounding display of Seagal action. Meanwhile, no one does the barroom
bully-beating routine better than Aikido master Seagal, using billiard balls
and cues with violent aplomb. I kinda wish Seagal actually used more Aikido
here, to make the thugs look even dumber by using their own weight against
them. Aside from the wrist-snapping, the only real patented Seagal Aikido moves
are employed in the finale. Still, it’s a wonderfully brutal film at times. I
mean, a corkscrew to the head and
some bullets in the chest for good measure? Was that really necessary, Steven?
Mind you, we’re talking about a film that begins with a quote from Arthur Miller
of all people, so let’s not go asking too many questions.
In the end, the
film is watchable when in action mode, but seriously dull at most other times.
It’s not awful, but it’s fairly average.
Rating: C+
Comments
Post a Comment