Review: Carol
Rooney
Mara plays Therese, a NY department store clerk in the 1950s, who is
unfulfilled and indecisive in her life. In to her store walks the glamorous
older woman Carol (Cate Blanchett), and although the latter is married it’s
clear that there’s an immediate attraction. Before long they are embarking upon
a relationship, though Carol’s marriage to Harge (Kyle Chandler) and societal
attitudes in general start to get in the way of their happiness. Sarah Paulson
plays Carol’s former lover and most trusted friend Abby, while Jake Lacy and
John Magaro play wannabe suitors for Therese. Cory Michael Smith (The creepy,
nerdy Ed Nygma from TV’s “Gotham”) has a small but important role I’ll
leave for you to discover.
Todd
Haynes (“Velvet Goldmine”, “I’m Not There”) previously tried and
failed at 50s Douglas Sirk melodrama with the overrated “Far From Heaven”.
That film was pretty, but it tried to have its cake and eat it too, by blending
sentiments of both the 50s and the modern era wrapped up in a stylised 50s melodrama.
It played awkwardly, like a failed experiment that never seemed real nor pulled
you in. This 2015 flick from the director and screenwriter Phyllis Nagy (who
only has one previous credit to her name as writer-director of a TV movie)
isn’t quite the same thing, being based on a Patricia Highsmith novel, not a
Douglas Sirk tribute. However, it’s still set in the 50s and has some melodrama
about it. This time, Haynes takes a more straightforward and less stylised
approach, doesn’t really let modernity come into the picture, and the film is
all the better for it. It’s a stunning-looking film, sure, but without the
wanky self-indulgent arty devotion to a bygone filmmaker. It’s a 50s story done
in the new millennium, but with a straightforward period piece style. That
helped me at least get into the story, not being distracted by all the bells
and whistles, let alone any confusion as to what era the voice of the
filmmaker/storyteller is coming from.
I’m
not normally a Rooney Mara fan, but she absolutely nails it here and is far and
away the best thing about the film. Timid, clearly lonely, and not terribly
worldly, through Mara’s excellent performance it’s easy to see how this girl
gets all wrapped up by the seemingly more glamorous older woman played by Cate
Blanchett. You really feel for this girl, who is quite clearly going through an
awakening of sorts. There’s a little bit of Talia Shire in “Rocky” to
this character and performance if you ask me, I’m not sure if I’m the only one
seeing that, though. I can say with more certainty, though, that Mara
definitely has an Audrey Hepburn look to her here, which is interesting given
the latter’s participation in the landmark gay film “The Children’s Hour”.
I must point out, though, that Mara was nominated in the wrong Oscar category
for this film. There is no way she isn’t the lead here, but I guess the studio
worried that putting both of its stars in the same category would split the
vote. In the end it didn’t matter because neither won.
Blanchett,
for her part, is perfect and really seems to flourish in this 50s era milieu,
fitting it like a diamond-encrusted glove. Yeah, I just used milieu in a
sentence. I hate myself a little bit. A perfectly cast Kyle Chandler and Sarah
Paulson also make the most of their few moments on screen with solid
performances. Although this is a film that is set in an earlier time, the one
break with the times is with the film’s ending. I couldn’t be happier with the
way this film ends. It’s not entirely conclusive, but it definitely suggests a
break from tradition with stories of gay life from this period. I was actually
quite overjoyed by that alone, even more so when learning that it’s actually in
the book, too.
Although
the fog-stained windows are a bit too much, this is a much more subtle period
movie from Haynes. Somewhat different from the usual story Patricia Highsmith
is known for (her stories have been turned into such thrillers as “Strangers
on a Train” and “The Talented Mr. Ripley”, both excellent films,
especially the former), and she wrote it under a pseudonym so as not to be
pigeonholed as a writer of ‘gay fiction’. This is pretty much a love story,
possibly with autobiographical elements, and if anything it reminded me a
little of “Brokeback Mountain”, thematically. I think this may be the
slightly better film, too. Impeccably acted, it’s one of the better films of
this type without being melodramatic, corny, or over-stylised. It makes me want
to check the novel out, as well.
Rating:
B-
Comments
Post a Comment