Review: Victor Frankenstein
Set in Victorian
Era London, where Dr. Victor Frankenstein (James McAvoy) happens upon a circus
hunchback who shows a keen study of human anatomy when assisting Dr.
Frankenstein in aiding a fallen trapeze artist (Jessica Brown Findlay) whom the
hunchback (played by Daniel Radcliffe) adores, as they reset her broken arm. He
decides to break the hunchback out of the circus, invites him to live with him
and work as his lab assistant. He also finally gives him a name, Igor
Straussman (after his often absent roommate), and he even helps straighten his
back with a brace. However, in the middle of the circus breakout, someone got
killed and that murder alerts the attention of Catholic Scotland Yard Inspector
Turpin (Andrew Scott). He’s doggedly attempting to track down the culprit, and
quickly decides he doesn’t very much like the cut of Dr. Frankenstein’s jib.
Frankenstein, meanwhile, is working on an experiment to bring dead tissue to
life through electrical means. Freddie Fox plays a snooty, well-off colleague of
the doctor’s, and Charles Dance appears briefly as his disapproving father.
Here’s the thing.
If I tell you that this 2015 Frankenstein flick from director Paul McGuigan (“Wicker
Park”, “Push”) and screenwriter Max Landis (“Chronicle”)
isn’t bad, it probably won’t hold much weight. That’s because I also didn’t
think “I, Frankenstein” was bad either, and I’m pretty much alone in
thinking that. But honestly, this movie really isn’t bad. It’s just not good,
either. The best way I can describe it is “Frankenstein” done Guy
Ritchie “Sherlock Holmes”-style, and if that sounds appealing to you,
you might not hate the film, either. It’s certainly a fair bit better than “Kenneth
Branagh’s Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein”, and although slow-paced it’s such a
different take that I was willing to cut it a bit of slack.
Its greatest
asset is undoubtedly a perfectly cast James McAvoy as the titular mad
scientist. It’s not a particularly subtle performance, but McAvoy is excellent
nonetheless. I’m not sure how intentional it is, but he’s actually genuinely
funny at times, especially early on, and it looks absolutely terrific too.
Andrew Howard is also good playing a truly hateable villain, who just happens
to be a devoutly Catholic policeman. Less effective is Daniel Radcliffe as a
quite re-imagined Igor. He’s not bad, but he’s also just OK and looks
alarmingly like a pancaked Helena Bonham-Carter crossed with Anne Frank. The
role itself, however is interesting to consider. It won’t be to all tastes, but
elevating hunchback Igor from servant to assistant doctor status here is an
original wrinkle. This way, you’re basically combining two roles into one. I’m
not sure I really bought the idea of the genius hunchback, but he gets ‘cured’
fairly early on, in what is a pretty amusing scene actually. Terrific cameo by
a perfectly cast Charles Dance too, as Victor’s cold and unsympathetic father.
I wish he had more than one scene, to be honest. There’s some pretty good CGI
on Victor’s initial ‘creature’ experiment, which is suitably horrific and
disgusting, but also interesting. The eventual human ‘creature’, however looks
too much like Thing from “Fantastic Four”, which is a bit of a mistake.
Silly, schlocky
camp, but at least it’s never dull. That counts for something. Hell, the silliness
counts for something to, if you ask me. No one’s going to call this a good film
in the conventional sense, but it’s quite alright and ‘quite alright’ might be
enough for you. It was almost enough for me to recommend it. Almost.
Rating: C+
Comments
Post a Comment