Review: Death Proof
Beginning
in Austin, Texas, a bunch of sassy chicks (Vanessa Ferlito and Sydney Poitier
among them) are at a bar chatting and drinking, when they are set upon by
scarred former stuntman Kurt Russell, who has dangerous intentions and a
really, really, indestructible car. Quentin Tarantino turns up in a
camera-hogging cameo as an ultra-cool bar owner. Rose McGowan is better than
usual, in a cameo as another sassy blonde-haired barfly.
After
this scenario, we are given a new set of girls several months after the events
previous, all of the girls are working on a new film (including stunt woman Zoe
Bell, and straight-laced actress Mary Elizabeth Winstead in addition to the
always cool Rosario Dawson as a make-up artist). They are on their way to
buying a certain Dodge Challenger in order to re-enact a pivotal scene from the
cult chase pic “Vanishing Point” when guess who shows up...but these
girls ain’t the kind you want to mess with, believe me. Michael Parks and son
play the lawmen they always do in films by either QT or Robert Rodriguez (“From
Dusk Till Dawn” etc.), this time draining the film of energy in one helluva
boring scene that goes on forever.
This
2007 Quentin Tarantino exploitation throwback (particularly evoking “Vanishing
Point”, the unforgettable Russ Meyer opus “Faster, Pussycat! Kill!
Kill!”, and the mediocre “Dirty Mary, Crazy Larry”) isn’t a complete
film. It’s one part of the QT/Robert Rodriquez exploitation movie experience “Grindhouse”,
except QT has added some footage (about half an hour!), Rodriguez’s entry (the
terrific “Planet Terror”) has been excised, as have the apparently
amusing fake trailers, and as has the entire fucking reason for being. I
understand “Grindhouse” was a box-office failure in its original context
in the US, but that’s no excuse to give us “Death Proof” out of its
original context. It certainly makes it very hard to review. You see, I doubt “Death
Proof” was ever meant to be good in
the conventional sense, most grindhouse-era films are pretty average, but when
coupled with another film and some fake trailers, and taking into account
atmosphere derived from a packed cinema screening, one has not a film so much
as an experience. The film’s distributors have deprived me, and all other
Australians (and apparently Brits) of that experience. I felt angered, cheated,
and decidedly uncomfortable throughout. But y’know what? Even in its original
context, I find it highly unlikely that I would’ve been a happy camper. For the
most part, “Death Proof” sucks, and would’ve dragged “Grindhouse”
down. I can’t say I’ll definitely check the completed film out if ever given
the chance.
The
first forty or so minutes would be unbearable if not for a terrific turn by
Russell (who should do more genre films, this is one of his best performances
since “Tombstone”). The film should’ve excised the first group of girls
completely, and just started with the charismatic Dawson and somewhat
accomplished Bell (who was Uma Thurman’s stunt double on the “Kill Bill”
films), these girls are a bit more interesting. Instead, we’re given about an
hour of talk, talk, talk (little of it interesting), with some awful
performances by Ferlito (who is exactly the same in everything before and since
this film) and the equally mannered Poitier. Even most grindhouse films (which
were mostly more horror and schlock oriented than this) weren’t this slow and
talk-oriented, and they certainly were never this long. When the action comes
(mostly involving Russell and stunt-woman Bell, Kiwi-accent and all), it’s
terrific stuff, but by then, I had completely lost interest.
Woefully
drenched in talk, mostly uninteresting wannabe hipster nonsense from someone
who should’ve known better. QT (who also scripted- badly) clearly had his head
stuck up his arse throughout this one, a major disappointment. Thankfully he
has delivered much of his best work since this misstep.
Rating:
C
Comments
Post a Comment