Review: Conquest of the Planet of the Apes
1991, and a plague has ridden the
Earth of cats and dogs, so man has decided to domesticate the ape instead. This
domestication has resulted in apes merely becoming slaves to humans. Circus
owner Armando (Ricardo Montalban) and the talking ape son of Dr. Cornelius and
Dr. Zira whom he has kept hidden for years are eventually exposed, leading to
tragedy. The now grown ape calls himself Caesar (Roddy McDowall), and he
becomes enraged at the brutality, cruelty, and hatred on display by humans
towards his kind. So, quietly seething…Caesar plots. Don Murray plays the evil,
hateful Governor, with Severn Darden and Hari Rhodes his underlings of wildly
different dispositions. Natalie Trundy (previously a mutant in “Beneath the
Planet of the Apes”, and a well-meaning human in “Escape From the Planet
of the Apes”) plays a female chimp here.
Just as with re-visiting the James
Bond series recently, I have found myself changing my view on at least one of
the films in the “Apes” cycle. It’s this dark, socially-conscious 1972
fourth entry from director J. Lee Thompson (“Cape Fear”, the “Guns of
Navarone”, the subsequent “Battle for the Planet of the Apes”) and
screenwriter Paul Dehn (writer of all the “Apes” sequels). I’ve always
thought the Watts-inspired final 10 minutes was superlative, but felt
previously that the rest of the film was dour, unengaging, and just no fun at
all. Looking at it again, it’s not nearly as good as the previous “Escape
From the Planet of the Apes”, but good enough to earn a solid rating.
One could argue that the riot plot
is more indicative of the present in which the film was made rather than
indicating any kind of future. However, a lot of sci-fi films, good ones, are
guilty of that. “Barbarella” and “Soylent Green” spring to mind
(though not everyone shares my opinion of those films). So that for me isn’t a
credible flaw. In fact, the riot plot is the film’s great strength if anything.
Shot in perfect, gritty 70s fashion by Bruce Surtees (“Dirty Harry”, “Play
Misty for Me”) where even the handheld camerawork counts for the film
instead of against it, it’s pretty well done. This worldview of a growing
discontent and eventual uprising by the apes is interestingly set up. Sure,
sci-fi films set in the future really ought to be careful when giving
supposedly futuristic dates (this one’s set in 1991. Yep. I must’ve slept through
the entire apes situation). It’s something Hollywood rarely seems to heed.
Still, dated or not it works. It may indeed be grim and a stark contrast to the
films before and after it, but thematically it’s a fascinating film, the plot
is interesting, and Dehn has obviously put some real thought into it. It’s not
a ‘fun’ film, but on this viewing I was certainly able to appreciate it for
what it was saying and representing. The character played by Hari Rhodes, in
particular is really interesting and full of implications (He also helps the
film get out of a potentially horrendous racial pitfall in my view).
Don Murray is just OK as the lead
villain, but fellow bad guy Severn Darden is tremendously oily and creepy in a
role that would spill over into the next film. He’s got a touch of Donald
Pleasance about him, actually. As for Roddy McDowall, this is his finest hour
in the series. He does a terrific job of making Caesar different to his earlier
role, Caesar’s father Cornelius. The normally rather genteel, witty actor gets
good and angry and fiery towards the end of this. I do wish more time was
devoted to showing how Caesar was able to communicate with his less-evolved ape
brethren, it does seem a missed opportunity. It’s a bit of a shame that by this
point the budget had shrunk and they seemed to just want to get it over with.
This would prove particularly the case with the subsequent “Battle for the
Planet of the Apes”, but it stands out here too because the film does show evidence of a brain in its
head. Some of the ape makeup here is better than at other times, when you can
see the obvious pull-over masks that were a sad development in “Beneath the
Planet of the Apes”.
An admittedly grim film, but a
thematically fascinating “Apes” film with a couple of terrific
performances by McDowall and Darden. It could’ve been even better if more care
were put into it and the budget higher. Still, it works and I’ve previously
greatly underrated it.
Rating: B-
Comments
Post a Comment