Review: The Mummy


Soldiers of fortune Tom Cruise and Jake Johnson are recruited by Annabelle Wallis to exhume the tomb of mummified Egyptian pharaoh Ahmanet (Sofia Boutella). She gets reawakened and all hell goes loose. Russell Crowe turns up briefly as Dr. Henry Jekyll, who has a particular interest in monsters.



They’ve seemingly been trying for a modern-day Universal Horror cycle franchise for years now, and it hasn’t worked. Mostly because the films have been largely awful. This 2017 flick from director Alex Kurtzman (best known as a J.J. Abrams associate and screenwriter of “The Island” among other films) and screenwriters Christopher McQuarrie (“The Usual Suspects”, “Valkyrie”) and Jon Spaihts (“Prometheus”, “Doctor Strange”) isn’t as bad as say “Van Helsing”, but still very, very weak. There’s the bare bones of something here…the bare bones of about 12 different undernourished scripts with little or no sense made, particularly on a tonal level (I should add that a few other writers apparently had a hand in the script too, David Koepp among them). Basically, it’s “Van Helsing”, the Brendan Fraser version of “The Mummy”, and “League of Extraordinary Gentlemen” all blended together. It’s all sound and fury, signifying nothing, and like “The Golden Compass” (which I personally rather liked) it might stop the franchise dead with just the first outing.



I knew I was in trouble right from the beginning, with a pointless prologue set in England in the 1100s before moving to present day England to tell its story of an ancient Egyptian pharaoh/princess. Yeah. Three minutes in and I’m all ‘Fuck, no. This won’t do’. It’s a dreadful opening stanza, what the hell did the Crusades have to do with anything else here? Sadly, the experience didn’t get any better, though at least it makes a little more narrative sense from then onwards. Well, aside from Russell Crowe’s minor character inexplicably being our narrator for events he only belatedly shows up for. That I could never quite figure out. Sofia Boutella is terrific in the title role, but that’s about it for positives.



Tom Cruise and Jake Johnson (in a good performance as basically this film’s Griffin Dunne from “An American Werewolf in London”) have fun buddy movie chemistry early on, but 1) I like my “Mummy” movies serious and horror-oriented, and 2) The trailers spoil a lot of what happens with Johnson’s character. I like Tom Cruise as an actor, but it’s beyond time that he gives us another “Magnolia”, “A Few Good Men”, or “Rain Man”. He’s a fine action hero, but the guy’s got solid dramatic chops too, so it’s sad seeing him slum in something like this, which isn’t even an action hero flick, really. It straddles a weird line where it’s not the shitty “Raiders” rip-off Brendan Fraser “Mummy” movies nor the Universal/Hammer horror versions, either. In fact, it spends the entire film wildly and unsuccessfully searching for tone and identity. At the very least it appears to be a “Mummy” movie made by someone who isn’t a horror fan. I mean sure, previous versions of “The Mummy” haven’t been terribly scary, but this film’s not even trying to be “The Mummy”, so why call itself that? After about 50 minutes the sort-of buddy movie/action-adventure vibe finally turns to horror, but it’s dull horror. Then Russell Crowe finally turns up to make it something else. It really ends up crapping out, and wasn’t any good to begin with. As for the aforementioned Crowe, he gives one of his worst performances since 1995’s “Virtuosity”. He should be suitably embarrassed, with Mr. Hyde’s chief attribute apparently being a poor cockney accent.



I guess if you cut out the prologue, remove the narration, and get to Cruise sooner and the film would at least be competent, if still wholly unsatisfying. As is, one suspects this was quite the troubled production (Apparently Tom Cruise had quite a bit of creative control over things). An attractive-looking film and Sofia Boutella is terrific, but…is this really the movie they wanted to release? It’s a real mess that never remotely finds an appropriate groove. The action and FX are fine, but somewhat unwelcome if you ask me. No, this just won’t do. Watch “Blood From the Mummy’s Tomb” instead. #NotMyMummy.



Rating: C-

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Hellraiser (2022)

Recovering junkie Odessa A’zion accompanies scuzzy boyfriend Drew Starkey on a break-in where all they find is a weird puzzle box. A’zion later opens the box and after some weird shit happens, A’zion and Starkey figure it might be a good idea to learn more about this messed up trinket. Goran Visnjic plays a millionaire who possessed the box before our protagonist nicked it.   Is there any point in remaking/rebooting “Hellraiser” when the 1987 adaptation of Clive Barker’s original text was written and directed by Barker himself? And is considered a horror classic? On evidence here, absolutely not. Directed by David Bruckner ( “The Signal” ) and scripted by Ben Collins ( “The Night House” ) and Luke Piotrowski (ditto) this is an entirely tedious affair. I took a long time to get on board with the 1987 “Hellraiser” , I have to admit. It was wildly imaginative and original, like a nightmare transplanted on to film. However, the characters were stone cold and left me similarly chilly t
Read more

Review: Boyka: Undisputed

Yuri Boyka (Scott Adkins) is out of prison and fighting for a living, with ambitions for the ‘Most Complete Fighter’ to make a real name for himself. However, after an opponent dies during a fight, the deeply religious Boyka starts to have a crisis of conscience. He tries to make amends with the man’s widow, which eventually pits him against a local gangster (Alon Moni Aboutboul, quite good). Anything with Scott Adkins will generally get me interested, and although this series peaked with the superlative “Undisputed II: Last Man Standing” , this 2017 film from director Todor Chapkanov (director of the SyFy movies “Copperhead” and “Ghost Town” ) is no slouch in a series yet to deliver anything less than solid entertainment. Producer Isaac Florentine is missed in the director’s chair, but Chapkanov gives us at the very least the series’ most dramatically ambitious entry, as Adkins’ ‘most complete fighter’ Yuri Boyka continues on his journey to redemption here. In this one, the
Read more

Review: Ninja 2: Shadow of a Tear

Scott Adkins is once again Casey, an American proponent of the martial art of Ninjutsu. When Casey’s pregnant Japanese wife (Mika Hijii) is rubbed out, he’s on a vengeance mission to find her killers. A friendly face, Nakabara (Kane Kosugi) turns up at the funeral, and suggests Casey come to Thailand to deal with his grief in another country. Casey initially declines, but eventually takes Nakabara up on his offer. However, his wife’s murder still haunts Casey, and with intel supplied by Nakabara, the trail eventually leads Casey to a brutal drug baron named Goro (Shun Sugata).   I was extremely disappointed with the first “Ninja” , but had heard that this 2013 sequel from director Isaac Florentine ( “Undisputed II: Last Man Standing” , “Undisputed III: Redemption” , “Ninja” ) was a damn near masterpiece of the martial-arts action movie genre. Having now finally gotten my hot little hands on it, I’d say the hype is a bit much, but this is unquestionably a much better film than the f
Read more