Review: Undisputed


Set in Sweetwater maximum security prison in California, we follow two boxers; Wesley Snipes’ Monroe Hutchens (all cool, detached arrogance) and Ving Rhames’ ‘Iceman’ Chambers (all swagger and intimidating badass arrogance) as they are set to collide and determine who is the undisputed champ. The former has spent the last ten years honing his skills behind bars and has a 67-0 record in prison-sanctioned fights to go with his life sentence for a moment of uncontrolled anger. Meanwhile, ‘Iceman’ was still the Heavyweight Champion of the world before being convicted and incarcerated for rape (he says he’s innocent of course), and has now been sent to Sweetwater in disgrace. The two try their best to downplay any feelings of being threatened by one another, with the supremely arrogant ‘Iceman’ not really taking the prison boxer all that seriously, whilst Hutchens sits alone in his cell making complicated structures out of toothpicks and looking all Zen-like. Observing it all is foul-mouthed aging mobster Peter Falk, who is a long-time scholar of the ‘sweet science’ and still holds sway inside and outside the prison walls. Michael Rooker is the prison guard who acts as referee for the fights, Wes Studi plays Rhames’ cellmate, whilst Fisher Stevens plays your typical little runt prisoner that every prison movie has to have.



Rock-solid 2002 blend of prison movie and boxing movie from filmmaker Walter Hill (“The Warriors”, “48 HRS”, “Streets of Fire”) probably spends more time with foul-mouthed Falk than I would’ve liked. Falk is memorable, sure, but very broad and very profane. More scenes with the enigmatic Snipes certainly would’ve helped (not to mention the talented Wes Studi and Michael Rooker), and some won’t like that neither fighter is shown to be an entirely good or bad guy.



Snipes (whose character was verging on being a contender before he was imprisoned) and Rhames are both excellent (especially the latter) and the film is still highly watchable and entertaining in an old-fashioned B-movie kinda way. Sometimes that’ll do, and that is the case here, even though I’m not much of a boxing guy. I just think that Hill’s decision to give us little subtitle information (who they are, what they’re in for, etc.) about each of the characters instead of actually giving us real character depth hurts the film a bit.



Definitely one of Hill’s better B-movies of the last couple of decades, even if it’s a bit of a stretch to think of Snipes and Rhames fighting in the same weight division (Seriously, have you seen Rhames? If it were martial arts, black belt Snipes might have a shot, but surely not the ‘sweet science’). Scripted by Hill and David Giler (“Aliens”, “Skin Game”) the film certainly lays on the Mike Tyson allusions awfully thick with Rhames’ character (even having a Robin Givens-like character tell-all in a tabloid TV interview- real subtle, Walter. Real subtle), without really laying judgement on him.



Rating: B-

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Hellraiser (2022)

Recovering junkie Odessa A’zion accompanies scuzzy boyfriend Drew Starkey on a break-in where all they find is a weird puzzle box. A’zion later opens the box and after some weird shit happens, A’zion and Starkey figure it might be a good idea to learn more about this messed up trinket. Goran Visnjic plays a millionaire who possessed the box before our protagonist nicked it.   Is there any point in remaking/rebooting “Hellraiser” when the 1987 adaptation of Clive Barker’s original text was written and directed by Barker himself? And is considered a horror classic? On evidence here, absolutely not. Directed by David Bruckner ( “The Signal” ) and scripted by Ben Collins ( “The Night House” ) and Luke Piotrowski (ditto) this is an entirely tedious affair. I took a long time to get on board with the 1987 “Hellraiser” , I have to admit. It was wildly imaginative and original, like a nightmare transplanted on to film. However, the characters were stone cold and left me similarly chilly t
Read more

Review: Cinderella (1950)

The story of poor young Cinderella (voiced by Ilene Woods), treated as a servant by her nasty stepmother (voiced by Eleanor Audley), and dismissed by her thoroughly rotten, ugly stepsisters. Her only friends are a group of mice, who are forever being menaced by a cat named Lucifer (or as I call him, Grumpy Cheshire Cat). The King (hoping to find a wife for his charming son) is throwing a ball and every available young woman is invited to attend, and Cinderella is most excited to go. However, her stepmother and stepsisters do all they can to prevent this from happening. But with help from the mice and one fairy godmother (voiced by Verna Felton) later, and Cinderella looks set to attend the ball. You know the rest, folks.   Lovely 1950 Disney animated movie from directors Clyde Geronimi ( “Peter Pan” , “Lady and the Tramp” ), Wilfred Jackson ( “Fantasia” , “Alice in Wonderland” , “Peter Pan” ) & Hamilton Luske ( “Pinocchio” , “Fantasia” , “Peter Pan” ), that is a bit too s
Read more

Review: Eugenie de Sade

Eugenie (Soledad Miranda) makes a deathbed confession to author/biographer (Jesus ‘Jess’ Franco himself), recounting the tale of how her depraved stepfather (Paul Muller) groomed her into a life of depravity, debauchery, and murder.   Not to be confused with the similarly titled “Eugenie…The Story of Her Journey into Perversion” (by the same director) or “Justine de Sade” (which is not to be confused with Franco’s own “Justine” for that matter), this 1973 Marquis de Sade adaptation from writer-director Jesus Franco ( “99 Women” , “A Virgin Among the Living Dead” ) is perhaps the perfect marriage of Franco, sleazy material, and actors. Basically this is what Franco’s “She Killed in Ecstasy” might’ve been like if it were based on a Marquis de Sade work. There’s a few slow spots here and there, but overall I actually think this is Franco’s best film. Yes, even better than my previous choice “Vampyros Lesbos” , and better than his more ‘respectable’ films like “Count Dracula” (a
Read more