Review: The Trip to Spain
Comedically inclined colleagues/rivals Steve Coogan
and Rob Brydon reunite for another culinary road trip, continually trying to
one-up each other along the way.
Filmmaker Michael Winterbottom (“The Trip”, “24
Hour Party People”) and stars Steve Coogan and Rob Brydon pretty much steer
the ship back on course with their third outing. This 2017 film thankfully
corrects many of the mistakes made in the previous “Trip to Italy”,
which was virtually a repeat of the first film’s best bits done poorly, and
with the roles unsuitably reversed. Rob Brydon as a sleazy ‘pants man’? I don’t
think so. This time out Brydon is back to being his affable, mild-mannered (if
to some rather irritatingly eager to amuse with rapid-fire impressions) self,
and Coogan continues to project a maturing version of the self he first offered
up in the original “Trip” (These aren’t documentaries, and so obviously
the actors/comedians are at best playing fictionalised versions of themselves).
Here he’s less randy mid-life crisis and more self-reflective and a bit beyond
the sports cars and skirt-chasing phase of his life. They’re an interesting
couple of characters.
Things get off to a good start with a very funny bit
involving domesticated Brydon eager to escape noisy young children at home. I
don’t necessarily believe it, but it’s funny at least. Also funny? Three
films/seasons in and the two stars still won’t acknowledge that they’re clearly
good friends. There’s also a genuinely funny bit where Brydon reads a travel
guide as the late Sir Roger Moore (‘We filmed much of “Moonraker”
here…’). As always, the two stars comedic riffing and impressions provide the
highlights, with funny duelling Mick Jaggers, with Rob even doing Mick doing
Sir Michael Caine, leading to Brydon then doing a Michael Caine bit (A later
bit of Mick doing Shakespeare is funny, too). Meanwhile, Brydon’s patented
‘Small man in a box’ routine is better integrated into this one than the
previous film in a larger joke between the two stars this time. Also, 23
minutes in and Brydon actually makes Coogan smile. A minute later he makes him
laugh, and laugh harder a minute later. Mr. Coogan and Mr. Brydon are actually
rather fond of each other, folks. It’s unmistakable. It also helps that Brydon’s
tumour joke is quite funny. Brydon getting pissed off at Coogan constantly
referring to “Philomena” is hilariously petty. Brydon telling a story
about how David Bowie very nearly said his name on TV is funny enough on its
own, but Coogan’s reaction to Bowie following Brydon on Twitter is priceless.
Admittedly neither of their David Bowie impersonations is very good, but
Coogan’s is better. In fact, Coogan overall wins out on the impressions front
in this film. As good as Brydon’s Terry Wogan impersonation always is on “Would
I Lie to You?”, Coogan does a great
one in this. He also does a good Michael Palin, and rightly points out that
Brydon’s Marlon Brando is really just an impersonation of Brando’s “Godfather”
character. We also get a good routine with Coogan playing a Spanish Inquisitor
stretching Brydon on the rack with the latter hoping to get taller. It’s a fun
film, and the stars seem to be more openly enjoying themselves (and each
other’s company) than previous outings. Brydon’s best moment in the film, in
fact the funniest scene in the film, plays on Brydon’s inability to shut the
fuck up and stop performing. The guy just can’t help himself and we wouldn’t
want it any other way.
On the downside, Brydon’s Scaramanga/Christopher Lee
isn’t as good as Coogan’s in the previous film, but Coogan does do a rather
good John Hurt at one point and Brydon does a great Sean Connery. Along with his Sir Ian McKellen (Coogan’s
sounds too much like Peter O’Toole), it’s one of the few times Brydon comes out
on top here. There were a lot of dull spots in the previous film, but none this
time out. In fact, my only problem with the film is that of the three this is
the only one where I felt completely aware that I was watching a TV series
edited together. It was far more seamless in previous films.
It’s a solid 90 minutes or so of entertainment and a
definite improvement over the previous film. However, if the series is to
continue, I suggest they venture somewhere outside Europe next time. That part
of the franchise is getting a tad stale.
Rating: B-
Comments
Post a Comment