Review: Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter
Murderer and hockey enthusiast
Jason Voorhees (Ted White) contends with not only the usual assortment of horny
Crystal Lake partygoers, but a young wannabe horror movie makeup artist named
Tommy (Corey Feldman) and his older sister Trish (Kimberly Beck), who live with
their freshly single mother (Joan Freeman). Peter Barton and Judie Aronson are
the resident hot youngsters, Lawrence Monoson and Crispin Glover are the eager
nerds, Bruce Mahler is a horny hospital worker, and E. Erich Anderson is a
mysterious stranger in town.
Unless you count “Freddy vs.
Jason”, there are no “Friday the 13th” films
wholeheartedly worth a recommendation (and even “Freddy vs. Jason”
hasn’t aged especially well, to be honest). However, along with the underrated
2009 remake, this 1984 film from director Joseph Zito (the decent slasher “The
Prowler”, Chuck Norris’ OK “Missing in Action”, Chuck Norris’
abysmal and un-OK “Invasion USA”) and screenwriter Barney Cohen (mostly
a TV writer) certainly comes closest. I may loathe the series as a whole, but
this one’s actually not bad. There’s a better-than-usual cast and Tom Savini (“Dawn
of the Dead”) providing the rather notorious FX work.
This one has a bit of a “Halloween
4” vibe to it with Corey Feldman a slight precursor to what Danielle Harris
provided in that film as a somewhat disturbed child with a weird connection to
the killer. In Feldman’s case, he’s a horror movie fan and amateur make-up
artist who fucks with Jason’s mind at the finale. You’ve even got a bit of “Halloween
II” as “Police Academy” dork Bruce Mahler playing a horny hospital
orderly. Some will probably find Feldman’s Tommy a creepy addition to the
series. He wears horror movie masks and perves on chicks. My response? It’s a
damn horror movie, and he’s the best thing in any “Friday the 13th”
film ever. All the bimbos and himbos getting caught having sex and sliced up
tend to blend together. Tommy is something different and I liked that. To be
honest, I think he’s probably more ‘normal’ than most kids. I know some people
are really uneasy with putting a kid in a horror film, but my two favourite
horror films involve kids (“The Omen” and “Child’s Play”), and I
think it’s a good idea to have a child in a protagonist/potential victim kind
of role (so long as it’s handled with a bit of taste) because by and large kids
are super sympathetic, you’re always gonna worry for a child in danger. There’s
an exploitative line you mustn’t cross of course, but that doesn’t mean you
shouldn’t do it at all.
Most of the characters here are
more likeable than usual, with Laurence Monoson playing the second geekiest
character in the film since he’s lucky enough to be working alongside Crispin
Glover. The one-of-a-kind actor is in fine form here, his dancing to some
Survivor rip-off song is one of the single funniest things you’ll see. Of the
girls, Judie Aronson will likely be the one you remember most, and yes that’s
because she’s the most frequently naked in the film, not because of any
character depth or lengthy screen time afforded to her. It’s a Jason film, it
was the early 80s, so…yeah. The problem –and it’s the biggest problem with the
film- is that there’s far too many characters. By the time soap actor Peter
Barton (with Glover and Monoson et al), you realise there’s just too many
moving parts to properly deal with (He also looks a good 10 years older than
Monoson and Glover, I might add). 45 minutes in is too long to start killing
off the characters, and there’s just too many of them running around in the
first place (Did we really need that whole section with Mahler trying to get
laid with the nurse?). You’ve got the kid, his sister, their mother, about 6
horny youngsters, and the mystery man who shows up. It’s good that some of the
characters are interesting, but that’s still too many left alive after 30-50
minutes.
In addition to cutting down the
character list, I probably would’ve liked Tommy to have been written to be more
knowledgeable about Jason so that the finale makes a little more sense and
isn’t quite so WTF? While I’m ragging on the script a bit (and believe me, it’s
a better script than any of the other entries by far), I should also mention
that adding a slight whodunit to the film and a potential red herring, is a bit
dumbski. Jason Voorhees is the killer, we know this by now. Yeah, I know it
started with his mum, and the next film also messes around with things a bit
too, but c’mon, trying to add an element of mystery at this point is a bit
silly.
On the plus side, this is the only
film in the entire franchise that even gets close to doing what in my opinion a
horror film should do: Be suspenseful, if not scary. Joseph Zito is a schlock
filmmaker with a highly uneven record, but in this instance, he does manage a
couple of moments of sustained tension in what is a very clichéd, run-of-the-mill
franchise (and subgenre of horror). It’s surprisingly competent on that front,
if a long way from being “Halloween” or “Black Christmas”. Having
a few interesting characters definitely plays a part in that too, however. I
also liked how he mostly keeps Jason off-screen early on save for his feet.
Yes, I have issues with the red herring/whodunit thing, but on a visual level I
kinda like that touch. As for the death scenes, Savini seems to favour (as does
the entire franchise) knives/machetes to the neck/head, and there’s some pretty
good stuff for gore-hounds on that note. There is one poor girl who happens to
catch Jason in a lazy mood so he just throws her out of a window and onto the
hood of a car. Ouch. The crown jewel is the much-discussed machete slide at the
film’s finale, which is clearly the best segment of the film. Watching it again
in 2019 was my first exposure to the uncut version of the film, so I was glad
to finally see it and yes, it’s awesome if you’re into that kind of thing.
Savini does a good job with the makeup there and the whole segment is rather
disturbing.
Still not quite quality enough to
fully endorse, this is still far and away the best of the original “Friday
the 13th” films due to casting, character, and even a tiny bit
of suspense here and there. If you see only one film from this franchise, make
it this one, though parts 3 and 5 and the remake aren’t dreadful, either.
Rating: C+
Comments
Post a Comment