Review: Death Line
A young couple (David Ladd and Sharon Gurney) discover
the dead body of a government minister (James Cossins) at a tube station in
London. Unfortunately, once the bobbies show up, the body has mysteriously
vanished. Odd, seemingly aloof Scotland Yard Inspector Calhoun (Donald
Pleasence) investigates, though his strong suit seems to be pissing off ex-pat
American Ladd with his disarmingly disinterested interview technique. The
investigation eventually leads all the way back to an 1890s London Underground tunnel
collapse disaster. Norman Rossington plays Pleasence’s #2, with Clive Swift
appearing briefly as another Inspector, whilst Christopher Lee guest stars in
one scene as a smug MI5 operative named Stratton-Villiers.
Uneven, sometimes dull, but completely barmy 1972 film
from American director Gary Sherman (“Vice Squad”, “Wanted: Dead or
Alive”, “Poltergeist III”) and co-writer Ceri Jones (an ad exec by
trade), which is also sometimes listed as “Raw Meat”. I personally think
the other title “Death Line” is at least more appropriate to the plot of the
film. It doesn’t quite add up to a satisfying whole, with the scenes down in
the underground with the dishevelled ‘Man’ (played by a make-up assisted Hugh Armstrong)
dragging on endlessly in a film that is too short for such repetitive
time-wasting. Also not helping is the truly terrible, wooden performance by
David ‘Son of Alan’ Ladd. He doesn’t even have his dad’s charisma or presence
(Alan Ladd wasn’t exactly Olivier, let’s face it), nor is co-star Sharon Gurney
much better. It’s a frustrating cinematic experience as their characters are
also seemingly only kept around in the middle stretch of the film because
they’re going to be needed at the climax. In that middle section, they’re given
absolutely nothing of relevance or interest to say or do.
However, whenever Donald Pleasence is on screen
shamelessly chewing the scenery, the film is sometimes a kooky delight. I’m
sure he pissed off many a co-star for it over the years, but Pleasence’s
refusal here to let any actor other than himself take command of a scene is
very, very, very funny. The man is having a high old time being busy on screen and
I guarantee his character’s allergies weren’t in the original script
whatsoever. I see what you’re doing there Donald, you shameless magnificent
bastard. His character and performance are both irritating and hilarious in
equal measure. He’s essentially the protagonist, but he seems like such a distracted,
oddball jerk. The other plusses here are fun cameos by Christopher Lee and the
always odious-looking James Cossins, as well as excellent cinematography by
Alex Thomson (“Excalibur”, “Alien3”, “Legend”) and
a cool, sleazy jazzy score by Wil Mallone & Jeremy Rose. Those cameos by
Lee and Cossins and veteran character actor Clive Swift are pretty useful,
because they make up some of the difference in the severely lacking
performances by Ladd and Sharon Gurney. Playing a smug, oily, disingenuous
rival of Pleasence, Lee only has the one scene but it’s bloody marvellous. The
fact that the very tall Lee and the very short Pleasence are unable to be
equally visible in the same frame is very funny stuff.
It’s such an odd duck of a film that is completely all
over the place. At times it’s playing like a tongue-in-cheek police procedural
mixed with a giallo (but with more raw-looking photography perhaps), and
there’s a few rather nice bits of gore. There’s a nice spade to the head in
particular. However, when we get down into the bowels of the subway it has
suddenly turned into “Phantom of the Opera” infused with “Texas
Chainsaw Massacre”, only far more static and dull than that description
might sound. For such a short film, it’s a real shame that the director lets
those scenes drone on and on to no real benefit. A little of it is plenty
enough to get the general idea and clearly just serves as padding to a thin
story. The underground set is impressively gruesome and grimy, though.
Intentionally irritating Donald Pleasence is a
scenery-chewing laugh riot in this otherwise frustratingly uneven horror pic.
It looks and sounds terrific, but some of the romantic leads are awful, and it
gets bogged down with too much unnecessary padding. An interesting curio with a
smallish cult following, but clearly quite thin, with Christopher Lee in
particular barely getting a walk-on.
Rating: C+
Comments
Post a Comment