Review: The Invisible Man
Elisabeth Moss orchestrates an escape from her abusive
and controlling partner Oliver Jackson-Cohen (forever to be known as ‘Not Jake
Gyllenhaal’ in my book), with the help of her sister (Harriet Dyer, with a not
terribly convincing American accent) and a cop friend (Aldis Hodge), who has a
teenage daughter (Storm Reid). We then learn that Jackson-Cohen, a tech
billionaire has supposedly committed suicide. However, it’s not long before
Moss starts to sense Jackson-Cohen’s malevolent presence hasn’t left, and is
haunting her. Everyone else thinks she’s crazy. But is she? Have you looked at
the title? Michael Dorman plays Jackson-Cohen’s estranged brother, a lawyer.
Former “Recovery” film critic Leigh Whannell (known
internationally as the writer and co-star of “Saw” and the rather more
enjoyable “Insidious” films) has the same fanboy encyclopaedic knowledge
of film as Quentin Tarantino (and myself for that matter). As the
writer-director of this #MeToo update of H.G. Wells’ basic concept, he shows at
least one very big difference to Mr. Tarantino: Tarantino happens to be a very
fine writer-director, whereas Mr. Whannell simply loves a lot of movies and likes
to show us that he loves lots of movies. That’s cool, but a good film it does
not maketh.
It’s a shame because although I initially thought this
was gonna be another “Hollow Man”, the more I thought about it, the more
I thought a retelling of Wells’ tale for the #MeToo era had a fair bit of
promise. Although Elisabeth Moss is starting to get a tad typecast as an abused
woman scorned, you could easily see how she’d be perfect for this concept. Whannell
just isn’t the right guy for the job. The script is derivative of the highly
underrated “Sleeping With the Enemy” in the first half, and Whannell’s
directorial bag of tricks offered up primarily in the second half is dull, limited,
and derivative too. The first half isn’t too bad (though the character relationships
are quite poorly explained), but that second half had me twiddling my thumbs
quite a bit as Whannell gives us exactly what you expect exactly when you
expect it, at least 98% of the time. When the script finally offers up a couple
of twists I didn’t see coming, the second one in particular I’m not sure is
very helpful to the film’s overall #MeToo aesthetic. So even when Whannell goes
outside of the horror clichĂ©s, he still doesn’t pull it off. Worst of
all, the title character is invisible for far too much of the film (you don’t
really see him for at least 90 minutes), not to mention inaudible for almost as
much. I’m pretty sure Claude Rains was rather chatty in the 1930s version, and
Chevy Chase certainly was in the underrated “Memoirs of an Invisible Man”.
Getting back to the “Sleeping With the Enemy”
connection, Patrick Bergin was certainly on screen for quite a bit of the film,
the film worked because he and Julia Roberts (in her best performance to date) were
both strong presences on screen. Giving us a villain who isn’t a visible or
audible threat, and who operates entirely in horror jump scare clichés was a
massive mistake. Frankly, I think trying to associate this story with Wells at
all was probably a mistake, too. That first twist was pretty nifty even though
I should’ve picked it, and there’s an earlier bit at a restaurant that is
hilariously brilliant. It’s clever, but also it’s a death that is both
surprising and a bit sad because we like both Moss and the victim in that
scene. Still, for the most part this one’s pretty blah. Jump scares are the
laziest thing a horror director can go to, and you feel there was a chance for
something genuinely good here that has been wasted by a miscast
writer-director. Despite technically being a horror film, this movie did not
need a jump scare horror journeyman with a fanboy streak at the helm. I liked
the first two “Insidious” films just fine, and even my favourite horror
film “The Omen” had a couple of (great) jump scares. This film didn’t
need that though. This film needed a real filmmaker, someone with a
better grasp of drama, character, tension, and atmosphere. Sophistication and a
little ambition, even. For crying out loud, if you need to go to the jump scare
well, can you a) Only do it on occasion, and b) Try doing it on an ‘off’ beat,
instead of the exact moment every horror director chooses. Hell, have the
menace pop out from the foreground instead of the background. Something. Try
something different. Anything. The camerawork is nice, though the
lighting is extremely murky which is a real shame.
The basic idea and central character are worthy in
this update of the H.G. Wells novel. Elisabeth Moss needs to start adding more
strings to her bow, but is nonetheless well typecast as the battered wife.
Unfortunately, instead of a smart update of Wells’ novel, writer-director
Whannell gives us “Sleeping With the Enemy” with more jump scares and
clichĂ©s (and a touch of “Gaslight”), and an almost entirely off-screen
villain. It never really satisfies as a result, it’s also completely unnecessary
to call it “The Invisible Man”, as it’s a very different story to Wells’.
Clunky and clichéd, though a couple of the attack scenes do have an effective
discomfort about them despite the jump scare tedium.
Rating: C-
Comments
Post a Comment