Review: Freaky
Teenager Millie (Kathryn Newton) is set upon by a
serial killer known as The Blissfield Butcher (Vince Vaughn), and stabbed with
a ritual knife called La Dola. He grabbed it during his previous slashing.
Millie survives the stabbing, unfortunately the knife has powers that result in
her swapping bodies with The Butcher! Katie Finneran is Millie’s loving (but
somewhat smothering) mother, Alan Ruck plays a bullying woodwork teacher who
loathes Millie.
A body-swap horror film isn’t an inherently bad idea.
In fact, my favourite 80s horror film “Child’s Play” is essentially a
body-swap horror film (Wes Craven used it in a couple of films too like “Shocker”).
Unfortunately, once again director/co-writer Christopher Landon has taken a
workable idea and done the least interesting thing with it (previously he made
the “Groundhog Day” horror-comedy “Happy Death Day” and its
equally unimaginative sequel). Basically, this is “Freaky Friday”
Blumhouse-style, a mostly unsurprising horror-comedy with far too much emphasis
on the snarky teen comedy nonsense. More emphasis on the horror side of things
might’ve produced far more interesting and twisted results. Instead, the
filmmakers think merely taking the body swap idea and adding some blood to it is
clever enough. No, all it means is you’re making a snarky 90s horror film but
with some added blood (90s horror was mostly pretty bloodless). Thus, Landon and
co-writer Michael Kennedy (whose background is mostly IT and animation for the
mostly dreadful “Family Guy” and “American Dad”) end up wasting
the talents of leads Kathryn Newton and Vince Vaughn by giving them only the
obvious places to go with their characters.
On the plus side, the film is surprisingly gory at
times, and I didn’t expect that at all. Unfortunately, that’s about the only
surprise you’ll find here, including the usual ‘jump scare’ bullshit idea of
what ‘horror’ actually is, and largely the same post-“Scream” meta
‘cleverness’ that is no longer anywhere near clever. Seriously, “Scream”
came out in the mid to late 90s…I was still a teenager. I’m 41 years old for
fuck’s sake, take the horror genre somewhere new! The filmmakers have a potentially
interesting and genuinely creepy concept to play with here, and they don’t
utilise it in a creepy or interesting way (I would’ve made Newton and Vaughn
father and daughter for one thing).
Kathryn Newton is a star in the making as far as I’m
concerned. Whatever ‘it’ is, she has it. A lot of it, actually. Sadly, on this
particular occasion she’s playing a semi-parody of a stereotype. Her
character’s best friends are a black girl and gay guy for crying out loud. Been
there, done that. Seriously, did I travel back in time to 1996 without my
knowledge? Newton is absolutely terrific with what she’s been given, and is
still the best thing here. It’s just not an especially interesting use of her
talents. I’m sorry, but all the violence and gore in the world can’t do a damn
thing to liven up a stale, safe Happy Meal of a horror-comedy. In fact, I kinda
wished there was no comedy here at all. Partly because the comedy isn’t funny
anyway. However, I actually think a straight body-swap horror film, whilst not
original, would’ve been a fair bit fresher than what we get here. I guess for
that we’d need filmmakers raised on 70s and 80s horror, not 1995-2001’s poor
excuse for horror. So instead of going somewhere genuinely creepy and horrific
with the concept, we get scenes of Newton inhabited by Vaughn’s personality
eating and drinking messily. He’s a serial killer, not a fat slob! Sorry, but stuff
like that and a couple of “Friday the 13th” (not my favourite
80s horror series) references ain’t gonna cut it for me.
Another issue I had is that I overall just don’t think
the filmmakers have figured out how to use the body-swap aspect in a
full-length film. The actual body swap aspect doesn’t kick in until 20+ minutes
into a 90 minute film, so there’s not enough time devoted to the body-swap
hijinks. That said, we know next to nothing about Vaughn’s psycho killer
character before the swap, so in some ways I wish we’d had more time before the
swap because it ends up rendering the body-swap aspect rather useless. How can
we care about the swap if we don’t spend enough time with the characters to
understand them before the swap? So obviously the film needed to be longer, but
who wants to watch a 2+ hour version of this? Vaughn really only gets to play
the ‘girl’ and he’s quite enjoyable in that role, but it’s the least
interesting, most routine aspect of the swap in my opinion. The best
performance comes from stage and TV veteran Katie Finneran, as the mother. You
might remember her as the nauseatingly-voiced Poppy on two episodes of the
genuinely clever and witty “Frasier”.
I liked that the filmmakers were willing to off quite
important characters, but I’d like it a lot more if the people were interesting
or likeable enough to care about their fate. For the most part, the characters
are either dull or horrible. In theory I liked that they made Alan Ruck’s
a-hole teacher character completely awful and irredeemable. However, with a
moment’s thought you realise it’s only because the filmmakers don’t have the
balls to show Newton’s character performing violent acts on anyone unless they
thoroughly deserve it. It’s blatantly obvious that it’s really Vaughn
controlling her actions, it’s just Newton’s body being used to carry out the
carnage. A 10 year-old could figure that out. For crying out loud, make Ruck’s
character a decent person and have the same thing happen, and it’d be a lot
more compelling. It’s OK for the audience to hate a serial killer, even if
their outer vessel is that of a teenage girl. Why have such gory deaths when
you’re otherwise offering up the most safe, unimaginative PG-13 product
possible?
A potentially intriguing idea is mishandled, leaving
talented actors to do fairly predictable, clichéd things. Ho-hum, this one’s
only marginally better than Landon’s “Happy Death Day” films. I don’t
think he’s an especially clever writer.
Rating: C-
Comments
Post a Comment