Review: The Mind Benders
A research scientist at Oxford jumps off a moving
train to his death, a whole lot of money is also found. An agent named Maj.
Hall (John Clements) investigates the man and finds that he was apparently researching
sensory deprivation. When Maj. Hall suspects the late scientist of being a
Communist traitor passing secrets to the Soviets, colleague Dr. Longman (Dirk
Bogarde) volunteers to go under sensory deprivation in an isolation tank, to
prove that it was the sensory deprivation tank that caused the scientist to
break. Dr. Longman’s last stint in the tank apparently left him greatly uneasy
about such practices, and although this second stint does indeed have rather numbing
effects, Maj. Hall still needs more proof. In order to prove Dr. Longman’s
theory right, Maj. Hall and research assistant Dr. Tate (Michael Bryant) resort
to using Longman’s wife (Mary Ure) to utterly shatter any beliefs he holds, to
brainwash him into thinking she is both unstable and untrustworthy.
Sometimes interesting, mostly dated and extremely dry
1963 look at sensory deprivation and mind control from director Basil Dearden (“The
Ship That Died of Shame”, “Victim”, “Khartoum”) and
screenwriter James Kennaway (the abysmal “Brotherly Love” with Peter
O’Toole) is just OK. The intermittent narration is particularly unnecessary and
although Dirk Bogarde and Mary Ure are terrific the film is just too dry to
become invested in their plight outside of fits and starts. As a result I think
this one will have a small (if devoted) audience who are inherently fascinated
with the subject matter and don’t mind the somewhat sterile, ‘kitchen sink’
realist treatment. I can’t say I overly liked the rather corny, schmaltzy
ending either.
The cast mostly holds up its end. Bogarde is sometimes
unbearably convincing here, and Mary Ure is terrific as well. There’s an interesting,
disturbing cameo by Roger Delgado early on and Michael Bryant is quite solid
too as the colleague who secretly fancies Bogarde’s wife.
I can see why someone out there might like this film.
I found it a very dry, rather dull treatment of some potentially involving
themes. I thought it too hit and miss.
Rating: C+
Comments
Post a Comment