Review: The Flesh and the Fiends

Set in 19th Century Edinburgh (and based somewhat on historical fact), respectable doctor Peter Cushing relies on grave-robbers to supply him with medical specimens. Enter grotesque and opportunistic Burke (George Rose) and Hare (Donald Pleasence), two such grave-robbers eager to make a buck…soon not even bothering with the grave-robbing aspect to their body-finding gig, if you follow my meaning. Dermot Walsh is Cushing’s concerned colleague, June Laverick his niece, and John Cairney a pupil who is dallying around with hooker Billie Whitelaw.

 

This 1959 John Gilling (“The Gorgon”, “The Reptile”) low-budget version of the Burke and Hare tale is sleazy fun, especially in the slightly more explicit ‘Continental Version’ (restoring a couple of brief tit shots, and a bit more graphic violence from an otherwise fairly tame film). It is not a patch on the previous “The Body Snatcher”, but it is definitely a worthwhile film for fans, with only a few minor reservations. On the plus side, the exteriors are superbly shot by cinematographer Monty Berman (“Murder Will Out”), showing how grotty and seedy the time and place were. Also, there’s a wonderful music score by Stanley Black (“Maniac”, “The Day the Earth Caught Fire”).

 

In terms of casting, Peter Cushing is perfectly cast as the outwardly respectable but arrogant doctor, and treats the film with the utmost seriousness. However, seriously sleazy Donald Pleasence is around to walk off with the picture entirely (He certainly works hard to make you notice him, as usual). He’ll make you want to bathe and scrub yourself furiously afterwards. Rose is no slouch either, looking like a slightly less seedy Sir Les Patterson. Together they make for a wonderfully decadent pair of creepy lowlife bastards. The underrated Billie Whitelaw also registers strongly in support, she’s got a real vitality and charisma to her I think.

 

Scripted by Leon Griffiths (Robert Aldrich’s “The Grissom Gang”) and Gilling, I think the film is a bit too long and overpopulated. I understand why the characters played by June Laverick and Dermot Walsh are there, but I think they’re pretty expendable, taking away precious screen time that could’ve been afforded to Cushing, Whitelaw, and John Cairney, who are much more interesting. As is it feels a touch unfocussed and slow-paced. I also think the film is slightly hampered by a piss-weak ending and annoying moralising. I think a very important character is afforded a little too much kindness by the screenplay at the 11th hour, which I don’t believe they really earned. Still, an interesting and effectively filthy film with several terrific turns.

 

Rating: B-

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Hellraiser (2022)

Recovering junkie Odessa A’zion accompanies scuzzy boyfriend Drew Starkey on a break-in where all they find is a weird puzzle box. A’zion later opens the box and after some weird shit happens, A’zion and Starkey figure it might be a good idea to learn more about this messed up trinket. Goran Visnjic plays a millionaire who possessed the box before our protagonist nicked it.   Is there any point in remaking/rebooting “Hellraiser” when the 1987 adaptation of Clive Barker’s original text was written and directed by Barker himself? And is considered a horror classic? On evidence here, absolutely not. Directed by David Bruckner ( “The Signal” ) and scripted by Ben Collins ( “The Night House” ) and Luke Piotrowski (ditto) this is an entirely tedious affair. I took a long time to get on board with the 1987 “Hellraiser” , I have to admit. It was wildly imaginative and original, like a nightmare transplanted on to film. However, the characters were stone cold and left me similarly chilly t
Read more

Review: Cinderella (1950)

The story of poor young Cinderella (voiced by Ilene Woods), treated as a servant by her nasty stepmother (voiced by Eleanor Audley), and dismissed by her thoroughly rotten, ugly stepsisters. Her only friends are a group of mice, who are forever being menaced by a cat named Lucifer (or as I call him, Grumpy Cheshire Cat). The King (hoping to find a wife for his charming son) is throwing a ball and every available young woman is invited to attend, and Cinderella is most excited to go. However, her stepmother and stepsisters do all they can to prevent this from happening. But with help from the mice and one fairy godmother (voiced by Verna Felton) later, and Cinderella looks set to attend the ball. You know the rest, folks.   Lovely 1950 Disney animated movie from directors Clyde Geronimi ( “Peter Pan” , “Lady and the Tramp” ), Wilfred Jackson ( “Fantasia” , “Alice in Wonderland” , “Peter Pan” ) & Hamilton Luske ( “Pinocchio” , “Fantasia” , “Peter Pan” ), that is a bit too s
Read more

Review: Eugenie de Sade

Eugenie (Soledad Miranda) makes a deathbed confession to author/biographer (Jesus ‘Jess’ Franco himself), recounting the tale of how her depraved stepfather (Paul Muller) groomed her into a life of depravity, debauchery, and murder.   Not to be confused with the similarly titled “Eugenie…The Story of Her Journey into Perversion” (by the same director) or “Justine de Sade” (which is not to be confused with Franco’s own “Justine” for that matter), this 1973 Marquis de Sade adaptation from writer-director Jesus Franco ( “99 Women” , “A Virgin Among the Living Dead” ) is perhaps the perfect marriage of Franco, sleazy material, and actors. Basically this is what Franco’s “She Killed in Ecstasy” might’ve been like if it were based on a Marquis de Sade work. There’s a few slow spots here and there, but overall I actually think this is Franco’s best film. Yes, even better than my previous choice “Vampyros Lesbos” , and better than his more ‘respectable’ films like “Count Dracula” (a
Read more