Review: No Sudden Move
Recently released con Don Cheadle is paired up with
Benicio Del Toro and somewhat unhinged Keiran Culkin for a supposedly simple
‘babysitting’ job. While Culkin accompanies spineless GM accountant (David
Harbour) to his place of work to retrieve some very important documents from
his employer’s work safe, the other two men hold the rest of Harbour’s family
(Noah Jupe and Amy Seimetz) hostage. Unsurprisingly, shit goes sideways, blood
is spilled, and now Cheadle and Del Toro realise they were set up and need to
figure out what to do next. Ray Liotta plays a volatile mafioso, a gigantic Brendan
Fraser plays a mafia middleman/recruiter, Jon Hamm plays a police detective,
Bill Duke plays an African-American gangster, and an uncredited Matt Damon
turns up at the climax to play an important figure in the grand scheme of
things.
Steven Soderbergh (“Erin Brockovich”, “Ocean’s
Eleven”) and I just don’t get along very often. I’ve tried. I’ve really
tried. Even his best films aren’t as impressive to me as they seem to be to
other people. His debut film “sex, lies, and videotape” was one I
admired more than I enjoyed, as well as the equally admirable “Traffic”.
“Behind the Candelabra” and “The Limey” were OK I guess. The rest
though? Meh at best, and awful in the case of “Unsane” and “Let Them
All Talk”. The plot to this 2021 heist drama sounded interesting to me as
did some of the cast members. Unfortunately, I was never quite as engaged by it
as I would’ve liked, though some of the supporting performances are good and so
is the camerawork.
It’s a stylish film and it starts well with some nice
snap combined with a rhythmic score by David Holmes (“Ocean’s Eleven”,
TV’s “Killing Eve”). After a while though, Soderbergh and screenwriter
Ed Solomon (“Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure”, “Men in Black”,
the underrated “Now You See Me”) seem to stop being interested in
telling a crime-caper story and start getting more interested in the workings
of the American automobile industry in the 1950s. I didn’t give two shits about
1950s exhaust pollution problems or greedy, soulless capitalist businessmen,
I’m afraid. I also didn’t give two shits about the lead characters played by
the normally reliable Don Cheadle and Benicio Del Toro, who seem to have left
their respective charisma at home. Del Toro, an excellent actor most of the
time, is shockingly flat for once (he looks bored) and Cheadle’s character just
never grabbed me at all. When your main plot for a heist film devolves into
boring car/pollution talk, that’s a pretty big problem. When you aren’t
remotely interested in the lead characters, that’s a big-arse problem.
Character and story are king to me. Maybe I shouldn’t be surprised given I
haven’t enjoyed any of Soderbergh’s caper films including the overrated “Out
of Sight”.
It’s a shame because the film does have some good
qualities and some fine performances, notably by young Noah Jupe (who is
excellent), but also Kieran Culkin, a distressingly massive Brendan Fraser, an
amusing David Harbour (playing the film’s most compelling character), a
cameo-providing Matt Damon (having fun it seems), a smooth-as-ever Bill Duke,
and a well-cast Jon Hamm who was born to play a 50s police detective. Ray
Liotta is his usual fine self, but a late arrival. I never thought I’d be
comparing Brendan Fraser to Sidney Greenstreet of Francis L. Sullivan, but
that’s who he reminded me of here in his role as a mob middleman. It’s a damn
good turn but boy do I hope he’s doing OK (apparently the weight gain was partly
for another film). Culkin meanwhile may not look much like a dangerous threat,
but playing a loose cannon here he’s got a gun and a complete lack of
give-a-shit, which may be even worse than physically intimidating size.
Maybe the issue is that it’s written by a guy best
known for comedies and lightweight capers. Here screenwriter Solomon is
delivering a not-so lightweight caper with too many characters and a
destination I just didn’t see the fuss with. I just shrugged my shoulders in
slight annoyance, thinking it’d be fine and dandy in something else, but a
heist movie? No thank you, I’m not here for car or pollution talk.
A dull, convoluted script combined with two fairly
dull leads saw my interest come and go throughout this affair. The director
tries to inject some energy to it, but that’s mostly in the first half. Somewhat
watchable I guess, but very disappointing and banal as a heist movie. But hey,
if you’re into American corporate/automotive history, here’s your movie.
Rating: C+
Comments
Post a Comment