Review: The Ring (1927)

Carnival sideshow boxer Carl Brisson meets his match when Ian Hunter steps up to take him on…and promptly beats him. Humiliated in front of his girl (Lillian Hall-Davis), Brisson finds out that the victor (Ian Hunter) is actually an Australian boxing champ. Seeing her man defeated causes Hall-Davis to switch her interest to Hunter, whilst still continuing to see Brisson. Brisson actually ends up working as sparring partner to Hunter, but it’s obvious that his true destiny lies in challenging Hunter for the big belt. That’s if he can win enough fights in the meantime to even get a shot.

 

Director Alfred Hitchcock (“The Lodger”, “The 39 Steps”, “Strangers on a Train”) scripted this 1927 boxing romance-drama himself (with only uncredited contributions by wife Alma Reville), and sadly it’s bottom-tier Hitchcock for me. I can’t figure out what his interest was here. Even by 1927 standards there’s not a lot going on here. It’s your standard two boxers rivalling for both professional glory and the girl. It’s far too stock to garner much interest or investment. Worse, the central love triangle doesn’t grab the audience. There isn’t enough of a connection with any of them. Also, in my opinion the wrong guy wins on both of those fronts. I get why it happens, but I don’t agree with it. I won’t reveal who, but the guy who wins is completely unlikeable, whilst the ‘loser’ takes both losses like a true champ. You struggle to figure out the appeal of one of the two blokes and therefore struggle to really relate to the girl, either. In fact, she’s a bit cruel and flaky if you ask me. The best thing by far is the performance by Ian Hunter as an Australian boxer, though he can’t save this thing single-handedly. This isn’t indicative of a filmmaker on the rise, it’s a filmmaker still learning on the job. There’s a couple of interesting shots in the boxing ring, but otherwise you won’t get much of an indication of its maker here.

 

Although it isn’t Hitchcock’s worst film, this boxing romance/drama doesn’t have much of anything going for it. It’s utterly forgettable despite solid work by a charismatic Ian Hunter.  

 

Rating: C

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Hellraiser (2022)

Recovering junkie Odessa A’zion accompanies scuzzy boyfriend Drew Starkey on a break-in where all they find is a weird puzzle box. A’zion later opens the box and after some weird shit happens, A’zion and Starkey figure it might be a good idea to learn more about this messed up trinket. Goran Visnjic plays a millionaire who possessed the box before our protagonist nicked it.   Is there any point in remaking/rebooting “Hellraiser” when the 1987 adaptation of Clive Barker’s original text was written and directed by Barker himself? And is considered a horror classic? On evidence here, absolutely not. Directed by David Bruckner ( “The Signal” ) and scripted by Ben Collins ( “The Night House” ) and Luke Piotrowski (ditto) this is an entirely tedious affair. I took a long time to get on board with the 1987 “Hellraiser” , I have to admit. It was wildly imaginative and original, like a nightmare transplanted on to film. However, the characters were stone cold and left me similarly chilly t
Read more

Review: Cinderella (1950)

The story of poor young Cinderella (voiced by Ilene Woods), treated as a servant by her nasty stepmother (voiced by Eleanor Audley), and dismissed by her thoroughly rotten, ugly stepsisters. Her only friends are a group of mice, who are forever being menaced by a cat named Lucifer (or as I call him, Grumpy Cheshire Cat). The King (hoping to find a wife for his charming son) is throwing a ball and every available young woman is invited to attend, and Cinderella is most excited to go. However, her stepmother and stepsisters do all they can to prevent this from happening. But with help from the mice and one fairy godmother (voiced by Verna Felton) later, and Cinderella looks set to attend the ball. You know the rest, folks.   Lovely 1950 Disney animated movie from directors Clyde Geronimi ( “Peter Pan” , “Lady and the Tramp” ), Wilfred Jackson ( “Fantasia” , “Alice in Wonderland” , “Peter Pan” ) & Hamilton Luske ( “Pinocchio” , “Fantasia” , “Peter Pan” ), that is a bit too s
Read more

Review: Eugenie de Sade

Eugenie (Soledad Miranda) makes a deathbed confession to author/biographer (Jesus ‘Jess’ Franco himself), recounting the tale of how her depraved stepfather (Paul Muller) groomed her into a life of depravity, debauchery, and murder.   Not to be confused with the similarly titled “Eugenie…The Story of Her Journey into Perversion” (by the same director) or “Justine de Sade” (which is not to be confused with Franco’s own “Justine” for that matter), this 1973 Marquis de Sade adaptation from writer-director Jesus Franco ( “99 Women” , “A Virgin Among the Living Dead” ) is perhaps the perfect marriage of Franco, sleazy material, and actors. Basically this is what Franco’s “She Killed in Ecstasy” might’ve been like if it were based on a Marquis de Sade work. There’s a few slow spots here and there, but overall I actually think this is Franco’s best film. Yes, even better than my previous choice “Vampyros Lesbos” , and better than his more ‘respectable’ films like “Count Dracula” (a
Read more