Review: Moonfall
On a satellite repair mission, NASA astronaut Patrick
Wilson encounters something he believes to be extra-terrestrial, colliding with
the spaceship it results in a fellow astronaut being killed. Back home in an
official inquiry, Wilson’s account of events is not backed up by mission leader
Halle Berry, and the findings blame technical issues and Wilson basically made
the scapegoat. A few years later the disgraced astronaut is now near-homeless
and leading children’s tours at a museum whilst Berry is now NASA deputy director.
One day, Wilson encounters budding scientist and conspiracy theorist John
Bradley who believes the moon is really an extra-terrestrial satellite and that
its orbit has changed. Soon NASA seems to concur, believing the moon is on a
collision course with Earth. Berry and her NASA colleagues need drunk and
miserable Wilson to get his shit together to help in their possible solution to
the problem. Michael Pena plays the new man in Wilson’s ex’s life, Charlie
Plummer is Wilson’s estranged son, Eme Ikwuakor is an Air Force General and
Berry’s ex, and Donald Sutherland turns up as a wheelchair-bound former NASA
official.
Critically mauled and a massive box-office flop, this
2022 sci-fi/disaster movie from director Roland Emmerich (“Universal
Soldier”, “Stargate”, “ID4”, “The Day After
Tomorrow”) is so embarrassing that had more people seen it, Emmerich’s
career would be over. As is, I think he might just survive it but I must say
this is by far his worst film to date. Yes, even worse than his maligned and
frankly boring “Godzilla”.
I knew I was in for a turd when we opened with Patrick
Wilson and Halle Berry on a mission while disputing the lyrics to Toto’s
“Africa”. This is your opening scene? Really? Of the two, Wilson is
surprisingly not bad and quite well-cast as a disgraced hero looking for
redemption. It’s a decent fit for his modest talents. However, the rather
overrated Berry is astonishingly amateurish here. I thought that way about her overwrought
Oscar-winning turn in “Monster’s Ball” too, among other turns but I’ve
seen her do OK work elsewhere (“Things We Lost in the Fire”, “The
Call”) and here she’s really, really bad. Either she’s phoning it in –
badly – or she’s just flagrantly miscast and unconvincing. Either way, she’s a
constant and unwelcome distraction barely mustering up the effort to deliver
her admittedly awful dialogue. On the other hand, John Bradley has no issues
convincing as the token conspiracy nut/token nerdy amateur scientist (and professional
janitor). He’s fairly decent value for what the role is worth, and I feel bad
that he has pitched his tent to the wrong blockbuster after being one of the
brightest spots on “Game of Thrones”. To be fair, I think a percentage
of the film’s poor reception at the box-office is attributed to audiences in
the COVID-era being more reticent and discerning in their cinema-going. At the
complete other end of the spectrum is a cameo-playing Donald Sutherland giving perhaps
the worst performance of his very long career. Wheelchair-bound, he’s hammy as
hell and quite sad, really. Almost as bad is an actor named Eme Ikwuakor as
Berry’s ex. He seems under the misguided impression that he’s playing the film’s
villain (and he’s definitely not meant to be), and scowls his way through a
completely awful, wooden performance. Did no one notice in the dailies?
The film has massive problems with narrative and
pacing. 20 minutes in and I was completely discombobulated. Yet, for a film
that darts quickly from one set of characters to another, it has the effect of
making the plot set-up unravel at a glacial pace. It’s only after an hour that
the characters get ready to go into orbit. I understand in hindsight why we
needed scenes with Wilson’s delinquent son and his new stepfather (a wasted Michael
Pena seemingly trying not to be noticed here) in terms of how the film
eventually plays out. However, when it’s all said and done, those characters
aren’t nearly interesting enough to warrant the time wasted introducing them at
the expense of moving the plot along quicker. You never get involved in the
immediacy and tension of the central plot because you’re already bored out of
your mind while Emmerich and his co-writers go all ADHD intercutting between characters.
Character depth is nice, but this isn’t the kind of film that really requires
it, nor does Emmerich’s film really give it to us anyway. We get time with the
characters, but do we really get to know all of them? Not really, not to any
great depth outside of Wilson’s character perhaps.
To be honest, when the plot does finally arrive…it’s
not especially interesting anyway and certainly very, very far from intelligent.
The disaster at hand could be anything really, it feels arbitrarily chosen. I
also felt Emmerich and his co-writers weren’t buying into their own BS enough
for the first couple of acts. In the first 45 minutes alone there’s at least 10
moments where someone comes up with something ‘crazy’. At what point do we just
accept that crazy is the order of the day here? I can’t swallow the film’s BS
if it keeps being so reticent and apologetic about it. Having said that, the
film up and loses its mind at the 90 minute mark to the hopeful embarrassment
of all concerned. So perhaps an apology was indeed in order after all. As for
the disaster scenes and devastation – it’s all very been there, done that and
the FX aren’t even particularly impressive.
Despite the best efforts of Patrick Wilson and John
Bradley, this is pretty tedious disaster stuff and eventually shamefully absurd.
It takes too long to focus on the central plot, and when it does focus…the plot
frankly isn’t all that interesting anyway and certainly very stupid at times.
Halle Berry’s low-wattage performance is as dull as the plot in this disaster
of a disaster film. The screenplay is by Emmerich, Harald Kloser (Emmerich’s
superior “The Day After Tomorrow” and his dull and silly “2012”),
and Spenser Cohen (“Extinction”). Perhaps Emmerich needs to put the
disaster movie to bed and go back to making films like “Universal Soldier”
and “Stargate”.
Rating: D-
Comments
Post a Comment