Review: Yesterday’s Enemy
Uncivilised actions in wartime in this WWII drama set
in the Burmese jungle. Stanley Baker plays the unit captain who is now the
senior officer since the real leader is currently badly wounded. In order to
try and get an explanation for a top-secret document they find, Baker makes
deadly threats towards the local civilians, which rubs members of the platoon
the wrong way. These include resident religious figure Guy Rolfe and a
liberal-minded war correspondent who is tagging along (Leo McKern). Phillip Ahn
plays an equally uncompromising Japanese commander, whilst Baker’s men are
played by the likes of Gordon Jackson, Richard Pasco, Geoffrey Bayldon (who is
already dying when we meet him), and the usual crowd of Percy Herbert, Bryan
Forbes (who also directed the excellent POW film “King Rat”), and David
Lodge.
One of Hammer Films’ finest
ever endeavours, this 1959 Val Guest war
drama (“The Full Treatment”, “The Day the Earth Caught
Fire”) is one of the famed studio’s
non-horror efforts. Instead what we have
is a rather thought-provoking, mature war film. Scripted by Peter R.
Newman (derived from the teleplay he wrote), here’s a film about the supposed
‘good war’ that nonetheless touches on the notion of killing civilians and war
crimes committed by the allies. The film features a great deal of killing,
British, Japanese, and local Burmese civilians all end up in short supply by
the conclusion. War is very clearly dangerous and maddening, and the film asks
some really tough questions here. Stanley Baker’s character in particular orchestrates
more than one violent event that he seemingly calmly, signs off on as a
necessary act for the greater good. Perhaps his decisions are necessary,
perhaps not. While the film ultimately doesn’t paint him as a villain, the fact
that other characters call him into question at all is quite different
from the usual WWII film from the 50s. That sort of thing is usually reserved
for films about Vietnam or at least made after the Vietnam War. And to think,
this was made by the studio that gave you “The Vampire Lovers” and “Twins
of Evil” among many other wonderfully lurid entertainments. Here’s
Hammer making a real movie and like a lot of their non-horror/sci-fi
fare it turns out to be one of their best films. I was frankly a bit floored by
this one, the body count in particular seems particularly high for the period
it was made.
An excellent, uncompromising Stanley Baker leads the
show here, he was a such a strong, underrated performer. There’s also top
supporting performances by Guy Rolfe as the resident religious figure, Aussie
Leo McKern as a war reporter who joins Rolfe in opposing Baker’s actions (yet
knowing he’s also the one keeping them alive), and Richard Pasco as a
lieutenant who is mentally fraying. Gordon Jackson is fine too but his high
billing is not indicative of his screen time or the importance of his character
if you ask me. Wolfe Morris (brother of Aubrey) is our resident Anglo actor
playing the ‘other’, an informant of not entirely determined ethnicity and not
very strong intestinal fortitude. It’s an interesting performance, putting
aside the obviously inappropriate ethnic casting.
Guest was never much more than a journeyman director,
but he’s at his peak here. There’s a particularly masterful shot of a firing
squad about to carry out a very controversial, horrifying act and you can see
on their faces that they don’t know if what they are doing is right or even
necessary. Meanwhile, if you’re not moved by the ending in some way, check your
pulse. Special mention must go to the excellent B&W cinematography by
Hammer regular Arthur Grant (“The Reptile”,
“The Damned”, “Quatermass and the Pit”), who makes the film look a
bit more expensive than it likely was. You can still tell it’s low-budget but I
was surprised that it was shot entirely in the studio.
If all you think when you hear the name Hammer Studios
is horror and science-fiction, give this one a look. It’s a really bloody good film
for any studio, and shows that there was a lot more to Hammer
than Dracula and Frankenstein’s monster. Must-see.
Rating: B+
Comments
Post a Comment