Review: M3GAN
Allison Williams plays a robotics whiz at a toy
company whose latest invention – a lifelike android given the acronym M3GAN
flops with her boss (Ronny Chieng, once again proving he’s a comedian and not
an actor). She then receives devastating news that her sister has been killed
in a car accident along with her brother-in-law. Williams is now tasked with
the guardianship of the couple’s likely traumatised daughter (Violet McGraw).
Said daughter takes an immediate fancy to M3GAN, and that’s where the trouble
starts.
So far as A.I.-assisted killer doll films go, this
2022 outing from Kiwi director Gerard Johnstone is a step up from the “Child’s
Play” remake/reboot. Which is to say it still largely sucks. Scripted by Akela
Cooper (the overrated “Malignant”) from a story by Cooper and James Wan,
I didn’t buy into the hype for this one and it turns out I was right to be
sceptical. It’s a pretty uninteresting affair that wants to play on the (in my
view greatly overstated) fears about A.I. technology, but botches it in the
execution. Why is the doll evil and manipulative, for instance?
Apparently due to an inadequate, nebulous ‘You were lazy in programming me so I
had to figure it out for myself’ explanation, which doesn’t answer a thing when
you give it a moment’s thought. Meanwhile, there’s some relatively interesting
ideas brought forth through a psychologist character, but that is undercut by
the absolutely dreadful performance given by Amy Usherwood in the role. So even
the one halfway interesting theme is spoiled.
The characters and plot are the biggest buzzkill overall
here. For all the hype and good reviews, Cooper and Wan give us all the same
story/plot beats a thousand other films before it have given us. You’ll see
elements of “Child’s Play 2”, the “Child’s Play” remake/reboot,
and even “RoboCop”. There’s no originality or surprise, it’s generic and
slow-moving to boot. After 35 minutes, the only thing of interest to have
happened is the neighbour’s dog attacking the doll. It’s a typically sterile,
derivative James Wan/Blumhouse Happy Meal. Executive Producer Allison Williams
is ludicrously miscast as a tech whiz and to be honest her screen presence – at
least here – is not particularly pleasant or appropriate for the character. Also,
none of the characters outside of the doll here are worth a damn. They’re all
stock and boring.
So is there anything I liked here? Well yes, actually
there is. I may not have found the depiction of A.I. technology believable, but
I gotta say the title doll is pretty fun, with voice actress Jenna Davis clearly
having the time of her life in the role. I also like the visual design of
M3GAN, it looks better than the Chucky doll in the “Child’s Play”
remake/reboot that’s for damn sure. It’s also clearly based on The Olsen Twins,
and no one will tell me otherwise. It’s clever in an otherwise intellectually
and creatively starved film.
The same technology run amok film you’ve seen a
billion times over several decades, this time with an A.I. assisted doll. The
doll is amusing, the film tedious and bland. What am I missing here?
Rating: C-
Comments
Post a Comment