Review: The Diary of Anne Frank
The story of the young Jewish girl of
the title (played by Diana Davila), her family and several other people
attempting to hide in an attic from the Nazis during WWII. Donald Pleasence
plays the fussy Mr. Dussel, who isn’t fond of children, especially precocious
loudmouth children like Anne.
Made for ABC TV in America, this 1967
version of the world’s most famous diary is directed by Alex Segal (who did a
lot of theatre-based TV directing gigs) and is based on the play by Albert
Hackett and Frances Goodrich. Adapted by James Lee (The silly Elvis movie “Change
of Habit”, the landmark TV miniseries “Roots”), it’s not one of the
more effective presentations of the story, and perhaps that’s why it’s a bit of
a forgotten relic, something Anne’s diary itself should never be rendered (In
my view it’s the most important historical document of all-time). As a
historical document there’s some interest here and some solid performances. However,
I’d rather re-read Anne’s diary, or watch one of the other, better filmed
versions of the diary/play.
I did appreciate seeing Viveca
Lindfors take the same character Shelley Winters memorably portrayed in the
1959 film version, and interpret that character quite differently. My one and
only issue with Lindfors is that the way she portrays Mrs. Van Daan she doesn’t
come across as someone who would care about a fur coat. Still, it’s an
interesting performance. Max von Sydow meanwhile, is pitch-perfect as Otto
Frank, with Lilli Palmer also quite good as Edith Frank. Donald Pleasence was
at his peak around this time and gets the plum role of Albert Dussel. Here he
gets to do his fussy, allergic act but in the case of Mr. Dussel, it’s an
established trait of the character and not just Donald Pleasence playing to the
cheap seats. It’s not a subtle performance – that’s not Pleasence’s bag – but
he’s spot on in the role. Diana Davila might not be as good or as charismatic a
performer as Millie Perkins was in the 1959 version (an underrated
performance), but the version of Anne that we get here is the closest to the
diary’s Anne that I’ve come across. The bratty, precociousness of Anne is
absolutely nailed down here. Anne doesn’t always come across as likeable
because she was a kid and kids can be annoying.
I can’t say the entire cast thrilled
me here, with three very noticeably dragging behind. Theodore Bikel makes for a
boring Mr. Van Daan, and Peter Beiger makes zero impression as his son. The biggest
casting issue for me is 35 year-old Marisa Pavan playing Margot Frank, who is
supposed to be 18-19 years old in the end. Does Pavan look 35 here? Maybe not,
but she doesn’t look anywhere near her teens and it’s distractingly obvious. In
her hands and in Lee’s script, Margot is rendered even more uninteresting than
usual. In fairness to these three performers, they’re admittedly playing the
three least interesting characters. However, the right casting can liven up
even the dullest of roles. I thought Diane Baker made for an excellent Margot
in the 1959 film version, for instance.
The studio set here is pretty
phony-looking, you half expect Mr. Rogers (or his less avuncular African-American
equivalent, Mr. Robinson) to pop in through the door. It also looks way too big
to represent the annex, the real life living quarters were surely more cramped
and it does serve to take away that claustrophobic feeling Anne and her fellow inhabitants
must’ve felt. Normally a stage play has everything feeling…stagey, or cramped
and you’d think the television format would further cramp things. Instead it’s
the opposite, even the 1959 film version didn’t feel too opened up.
Despite not being overly fond of this
re-telling, I’m really glad I was able to see it. Thought lost at one point,
you can find it online if you’re clever. It’s worth tracking down if you’re
interested, just be aware that it’s not very good. It’s not overly
effective as a piece of filmed storytelling, but it has worth as a curio of seeing
what televised plays were like in the 60s. You just don’t see something like
this very often anymore if at all.
Rating: C+
Comments
Post a Comment