Review: Blitz
A serial killer calling himself ‘Blitz’ (Aidan Gillen) is targeting South
London cops, and hard-arse Detective Sergeant Brant (Jason Statham) vows to
track the demented, but cunning and wily killer down. Brant breaks rules to get
the job done, but for this case the macho cop has to deal with the new, openly
gay Detective Inspector Porter Nash (Paddy Considine), who is far more
by-the-book. David Morrissey plays a hack journo who gets caught up in things,
whilst Zawe Ashton plays a young WPC with past drug issues and connections with
young street hooligans from the seedy side of town.
If you think the idea of Jason Statham making like a Brit “Dirty
Harry” sounds like fun, think again, because this 2011 Elliott Lester (only
his second feature to date) film isn’t the brooding, kick-arse urban crime
flick you want it to be. For once, I don’t actually blame Lionsgate (infamous
for their shitty treatment of some genuinely enjoyable films like “Blood
Creek”) for keeping this one quiet, it’s awfully low-key, meandering, and
mostly dull.
There’s a “Harry Brown”-esque subplot involving young hooligans
and a junkie WPC (Zawe Ashton, who seems to know all there is to know about “The
Crying Game”) that eats up way too much screen time for something that has
so little connection to the main thrust of the film, and which is so incredibly
uninteresting. I really don’t know why screenwriter Nathan Parker (“Moon”)
has focused so much on this story, though perhaps he is just faithfully
adapting from the Ken Bruen novel. It seemed more fitting of TV’s “The Bill”
to me, however. Ashton’s terribly amateurish performance (not even at a TV soap
standard) certainly doesn’t help matters, and the film grinds to a
skull-crushingly boring halt every time this side-story is dealt with. It also
has the film running way too long and with no energy at all, the finale is
especially sluggish. Was there an editor in employ on this project?
At first, I thought Jason Statham was going to be perfectly cast here as
the vigilante cop, particularly after a “Death Wish”-style opening scene
where Statham seemed to be in a less charitable mood than even Harry Callahan.
Unfortunately, because Lester’s approach is more drama than action/thriller,
Statham’s entertainingly tough performance seems an ill-fit, ultimately. His
performance belongs in “Crank 3”, not this, and an actor capable of more
depth was perhaps needed for the part (Clive Owen, maybe?).
The film is not a total loss, however, thanks to the performances of
Paddy Considine and especially Aidan Gillen. I’m not a Considine fan in the
slightest, but cast as a gay copper, he provides an amusingly straight-laced
(if you’ll pardon the pun) counterpart to Statham’s blokey, uber-macho
rule-breaker. Gillen, who provided unmemorable villainy in “12 Rounds”
but enjoyable ambiguity on “Game of Thrones”, is a revelation here.
Creepy as hell and borderline pathetic, his blend of Gary Oldman (but more
subtle) and Tommy Lee Jones brand of villainy belongs in a much better film.
It’s a shame that this film isn’t much good, because Gillen’s stellar work
deserves an audience. Cast in a bit part as a WPC who flirts with Statham for a
scene or two, the underrated Christina Cole once again shows that she ought to
be seen more often and in bigger roles. She has ‘it’ in spades and is beautiful
to boot. Less attractive by far is the film’s look. I must call out
cinematographer Rob Hardy here for providing us with what surely must be the
brownest movie ever made. It’s muddy, monochromatic, and with a slight
made-in-Bolivia vibe about it (I’m sure it wasn’t, though).
With its extraneous subplots, agonisingly slow pace and exaggerated
length, this cop-killer film isn’t anywhere near as good as it should be.
Gillen’s performance is tops, though.
Rating: C
Comments
Post a Comment