Review: Source Code
Jake Gyllenhaal is an Air Force captain who wakes up on a train in
Chicago and greeted by a sweet-faced young woman (Michelle Monaghan) who seems
to know him and claims he’s a teacher. When he goes to the bathroom and looks
in the mirror, he sees someone else’s face instead of his own! Then a bomb goes
off, blowing up the train and everyone on board! He wakes up again in some kind
of capsule, monitored by Vera Farmiga and scientist Jeffrey Wright who (after
much insistence from Gyllenhaal) inform him that he is taking part in an
experiment called the Source Code project. This top-secret, probably dubious
project involves technology that allows him to take on the body and mind of one
of the dead passengers to relive the last 8 minutes on board the train in order
to track down the identity of the bomber. Not an easy task in 8 minutes on a
large and busy train. It’s not exactly time travel, either. Apparently after
someone dies, there’s a small eight minute window that can be opened up and
manipulated by someone else. The train blew up earlier in the day and there is
evidence to suggest that the bomber has planted explosives elsewhere in the
city. So any information Gyllenhaal can come up with to help with catching the
nutter ASAP is vital. Gyllenhaal decides to try and save Monaghan and others
whilst searching for the bomber, despite being told by Farmiga and Wright that
such a thing is impossible and he should stay on task. However, Gyllenhaal
starts to experience things that don’t seem to gel with the science Intel he’s
getting from Farmiga and Wright. And besides, Monaghan is awfully cute.
This 2011 sci-fi whodunit from director Duncan Jones (AKA Zowie Bowie,
and director of the interesting “Moon”) didn’t always make sense to me,
but that might be more my intellectual failings than anything else. Besides,
the more this film explained itself and tried to be as realistic as possible,
the more ridiculous it would likely appear. The film will already divide
audiences between just going with the flow or picking up on every
implausibility. I went along with it. It’s a good, smart yarn at any rate, with
the underrated Jake Gyllenhaal perfectly cast, as is the offbeat Jeffrey Wright
(not an easy actor to cast, nor rein in his eccentric tendencies) as the
scientist who may or may not be as smart as he probably thinks he is. Hell,
even Michelle Monaghan’s role suits her one asset- a girl next door appeal.
The one weak link in the cast is unsurprisingly the horrendously
overrated Vera Farmiga. She doesn’t mug for the camera like in most of her
overwrought performances but she’s still the only actress I can think of who
can be both stiff and histrionic at the same time. Both monotonous and
overwrought in the same scene. You’d swear Jones had given her one direction in
the entire film: Act hesitant. And by God, that’s what she’s going to do. At
every moment. In every one of her scenes. It was amusing, though, to see her
shove her face into the camera at one point to distort it because I think her
face naturally appears as though it has entered a hall of mirrors.
Bizarre-looking woman.
Although it’s essentially sci-fi, the film reminds me of Hitchcock a lot,
especially “The Lady Vanishes” which was another film involving a
mystery on a train. In fact, the film could perhaps best be described as
Hitchcock’s “The Lady Vanishes” meets “Flightplan” meets “Groundhog
Day” meets “Déjà Vu”. Even though I found the film confusing at
times, I was never frustrated by its holding back on information. It’s a tricky
thing to do, but this film does that well. Less impressive is the film’s big
twist or most vital piece of information, which only a fool wouldn’t pick from
a mile away. Also, for a film with such elaborate and intelligent trappings,
the terrorist turns out to be so wimpy you almost wish screenwriter Ben Ripley
(“Species III” if you can believe it) relied on the old Arab Terrorist
standby instead. It’d be racist and abhorrent, sure, but this minor league
twerp’s motives just don’t seem to suffice given everything else in the film. It
ends the film on a downer, after such an enjoyable ride.
A good (if overrated) film, but a different choice of terrorist with more
interesting motives would’ve made it even better. Still, there’s plenty of
fascinating concepts and issues for a post-film debate.
Rating: B-
Comments
Post a Comment