Review: Happy Endings

A quirky comedy/drama in which various characters lives intersect; Lisa Kudrow works in an abortion clinic, and has a masseuse boyfriend (Bobby Cannavale). Into her life comes wannabe filmmaker Jesse Bradford, promising to give her the whereabouts of the son she gave up for adoption if she’ll just let him document the reunion on film. Steve Coogan is Kudrow’s gay stepbrother who along with his partner are friends with a lesbian couple (Laura Dern, Sarah Clarke). The couple have a baby from a supposed anonymous donor, but Coogan is suspicious. Maggie Gyllenhaal plays an amazingly charismatic and charming gold-digger who gets her hooks into confused gay man Jason Ritter, but might actually be more interested in his nerdy dad (Tom Arnold). But could there be more going on?


This 2005 comedy from writer-director Don Roos (the OK Christina Ricci flick “The Opposite of Sex”) is quite liked in most quarters of the critical community, but I found it a teeth-gratingly annoying, aimless, and pointless film full of truly unpleasant people. We get off to the worst imaginable start, with annoyingly cute and quirky title cards that are unfunny and lazy. Meanwhile, the movie is called “Happy Endings” and Lisa Kudrow has a massage early in the film- Get it? Yes, I do, and it’s not funny. At all.


The incandescent Maggie Gyllenhaal is a bright shining light, but even she can’t work miracles. There’s just something so...naughty about her, isn’t there? She’s terrific. I don’t know what was being said here, all I know is that a whole film with the Maggie Gyllenhaal character at its centre (and she’s not even all that likeable) would be so much more worthwhile than this crap. I can only imagine how horrible the film would be if the originally intended choice of Gwyneth Paltrow came to pass. So let’s all be thankful to Ms. Gyllenhaal for making this film a little less painful. She also sings a couple of Billy Joel covers, including an OK version of ‘Honesty’.


Tom Arnold is well-cast (Kudrow too, but horribly unlikeable), but his role is a total cliché, and Bobby Cannavale’s role and terrible performance are a cliché of a stereotype. As for Steve Coogan, all I have to report is that back in 2005 he looked a whole lot younger. Oh, and his character is absolutely unbearable and basically gets everything he deserves (though, because this film is terrible, we don’t get a great idea of just what that involves. Mr. Roos clearly doesn’t care about this story strand as much as the others). Jesse Bradford’s performance and character are especially stupid, and it’s easy to see why he stopped appearing in quite so many films on my radar after this (He used to turn up in everything I was watching, it seemed). It’s not entirely his fault, though, because his character is just ridiculous and clichéd.


I also have absolutely no idea why the film’s cinematographer J. Clark Mathis is using handheld, given this is a quirky character piece.


What was the point? Why was I meant to care? This is like sub-par Woody Allen territory, only even worse. Sorry, but I got nothing out of this film at all, except the desire to scrub myself clean afterwards. Actually, the “American Beauty” reference was funny, but the rest...pitiful. Sorry, critics, but audiences got this one right. It deserved to flop.

 

Rating: D-

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Hellraiser (2022)

Recovering junkie Odessa A’zion accompanies scuzzy boyfriend Drew Starkey on a break-in where all they find is a weird puzzle box. A’zion later opens the box and after some weird shit happens, A’zion and Starkey figure it might be a good idea to learn more about this messed up trinket. Goran Visnjic plays a millionaire who possessed the box before our protagonist nicked it.   Is there any point in remaking/rebooting “Hellraiser” when the 1987 adaptation of Clive Barker’s original text was written and directed by Barker himself? And is considered a horror classic? On evidence here, absolutely not. Directed by David Bruckner ( “The Signal” ) and scripted by Ben Collins ( “The Night House” ) and Luke Piotrowski (ditto) this is an entirely tedious affair. I took a long time to get on board with the 1987 “Hellraiser” , I have to admit. It was wildly imaginative and original, like a nightmare transplanted on to film. However, the characters were stone cold and left me similarly chilly t
Read more

Review: Cinderella (1950)

The story of poor young Cinderella (voiced by Ilene Woods), treated as a servant by her nasty stepmother (voiced by Eleanor Audley), and dismissed by her thoroughly rotten, ugly stepsisters. Her only friends are a group of mice, who are forever being menaced by a cat named Lucifer (or as I call him, Grumpy Cheshire Cat). The King (hoping to find a wife for his charming son) is throwing a ball and every available young woman is invited to attend, and Cinderella is most excited to go. However, her stepmother and stepsisters do all they can to prevent this from happening. But with help from the mice and one fairy godmother (voiced by Verna Felton) later, and Cinderella looks set to attend the ball. You know the rest, folks.   Lovely 1950 Disney animated movie from directors Clyde Geronimi ( “Peter Pan” , “Lady and the Tramp” ), Wilfred Jackson ( “Fantasia” , “Alice in Wonderland” , “Peter Pan” ) & Hamilton Luske ( “Pinocchio” , “Fantasia” , “Peter Pan” ), that is a bit too s
Read more

Review: Eugenie de Sade

Eugenie (Soledad Miranda) makes a deathbed confession to author/biographer (Jesus ‘Jess’ Franco himself), recounting the tale of how her depraved stepfather (Paul Muller) groomed her into a life of depravity, debauchery, and murder.   Not to be confused with the similarly titled “Eugenie…The Story of Her Journey into Perversion” (by the same director) or “Justine de Sade” (which is not to be confused with Franco’s own “Justine” for that matter), this 1973 Marquis de Sade adaptation from writer-director Jesus Franco ( “99 Women” , “A Virgin Among the Living Dead” ) is perhaps the perfect marriage of Franco, sleazy material, and actors. Basically this is what Franco’s “She Killed in Ecstasy” might’ve been like if it were based on a Marquis de Sade work. There’s a few slow spots here and there, but overall I actually think this is Franco’s best film. Yes, even better than my previous choice “Vampyros Lesbos” , and better than his more ‘respectable’ films like “Count Dracula” (a
Read more