Review: The Sword in the Stone
Set in ye olde
England where King Uther has died. There’s a sword, it’s in a stone, and only
the rightful owner can pluck it and take the throne. Our main character is
wannabe squire Arthur, AKA ‘Wart’ who comes into contact with a seemingly
prescient wizard named Merlin, who attempts to educate the boy for a higher
purpose Arthur does not yet know of. In their way stands sorceress Madame Mim
(voiced by Martha Wentworth), who may or may not play the cranky bus driver on “South
Park” in another life.
Released in 1963,
this Disney animated film was the studio’s animated version of the legend of
King Arthur. Directed by Wolfgang Reitherman (“Sleeping Beauty”, “The
Jungle Book”, the underrated “Robin Hood”) and scripted by Bill Peet
(“Fantasia”, “Cinderella”, “Alice in Wonderland”, “Peter
Pan”), it’s a pretty boring film, despite it being one of the lighter
interpretations of the legend, which is more my thing than say the much darker
and murkier “Excalibur”. Unfortunately, it’s also barely an Arthurian
film at all. The Arthur character spends most of the film being nicknamed
‘Wart’, modern geographical names like London are brought up, and the title
event only comes into play in the last ten minutes. That’s unforgiveable.
Arthur/Wart’s American accent (predominantly voiced by Ricky Sorenson) doesn’t
help, either.
The songs are
pretty bad, but made worse by the fact that none of the cast can actually hold
a tune. Thankfully, there’s not too much of it. The bulk of the film is spent
with Merlin and Arthur/Wart magically turning themselves into various animal
disguises, which gets old really fast. It also doesn’t help that Archimedes the
owl seems to cope better in the water than Arthur/Wart in fish form. What the
hell?
Having said all
that, the character of Merlin (voiced by Karl Swenson) is a show-stealer (for
whatever that’s worth), and closer to my idea of the character than in some of
the darker interpretations of these characters like the overrated “Excalibur”.
It’s not as
outright terrible as say, “Fantasia” or “Treasure Planet”, just
boring, often anachronistic, and barely Arthurian at all. Based on a T.H. White
novel, this was not the Magic Kingdom’s finest hour, and sadly it really
could’ve been something. There’s a good kids movie there in the basic material,
but Disney cocked it up.
Rating: C
Comments
Post a Comment