Review: The African Queen


Set in 1914, Katharine Hepburn is Rose Sayer, a prim and proper British missionary in East Africa with her brother, played by Robert Morley. WWI has broken out and it’s getting unsafe to stay, but Rose and her brother insist. Unfortunately, before long the Germans turn up and in a scuffle, Morley is killed. Humphrey Bogart plays Charlie, the grubby-looking but well-meaning Canadian steamboat captain who delivers supplies to Rose and her brother. When he turns up and learns what has happened, he kindly offers to help bury the brother and then get Rose to safety. Thus begins a trip along the river between two complete and utter opposites.

 

Long before Robert Zemeckis gave us “Romancing the Stone” in 1984, John Huston (“The Misfits”, “The Maltese Falcon”, “The Asphalt Jungle”) gave us this grand romantic adventure from 1951. Based on a book by C.S. Forester (“Sink the Bismarck!”), it’s a classic romance story, but with enough other stuff to keep the boys interested too. It is somewhat of a war movie after all, when you get right down to it. It’s grand, classic Hollywood entertainment containing something for everyone.

 

Humphrey Bogart won an Oscar here in one of his best-ever performances. I’m not normally a Katharine Hepburn fan, but this Oscar-nominated turn is easily one of her least irritating performances, even if she never sounds English so much as New England. No matter the accent (and Bogey doesn’t even try a Canadian accent), she’s pitch-perfect casting as the rather prim and proper spinster. She and Bogey make for an excellent romantic pairing, perhaps one of the finest in cinematic history. However, even a staunch non-drinker like me finds the scene where Hepburn faints at the very sight of alcohol to be awfully silly. The rest of the romantic odd couple pairing, is excellent, though. In fact, the only problem I have with the whole film (aside from a bit of dodgy projection work), is that the noisy motor of the boat means that both Bogey and Hepburn have to shout a lot of their dialogue. But any flaws are minor and frankly a bit petty.

 

The action is also pretty well-staged for 1951 I must say. It’s a shame inimitable British character actor Robert Morley doesn’t get many scenes as Hepburn’s brother (a bit of a stretch in casting I might add), and in fact the role doesn’t play to his normally pompous, comedic strengths. He is, however as solid as ever and does what he can. It’s certainly interesting to see him in such a different role.

 

This isn’t the masterpiece many claim it to be, but it’s very good entertainment with great stars, terrific scenery captured by Jack Cardiff (“Black Narcissus”, “The Vikings”), and a little something for everyone. The Oscar-nominated screenplay is by Huston, James Agee (“The Night of the Hunter”), John Collier (“The War Lord”, “I Am a Camera”), and with dialogue by Peter Viertel, who would later write about the experience in White Hunter Black Heart (Later turned into the underrated Clint Eastwood movie).

 

Rating: B

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Hellraiser (2022)

Recovering junkie Odessa A’zion accompanies scuzzy boyfriend Drew Starkey on a break-in where all they find is a weird puzzle box. A’zion later opens the box and after some weird shit happens, A’zion and Starkey figure it might be a good idea to learn more about this messed up trinket. Goran Visnjic plays a millionaire who possessed the box before our protagonist nicked it.   Is there any point in remaking/rebooting “Hellraiser” when the 1987 adaptation of Clive Barker’s original text was written and directed by Barker himself? And is considered a horror classic? On evidence here, absolutely not. Directed by David Bruckner ( “The Signal” ) and scripted by Ben Collins ( “The Night House” ) and Luke Piotrowski (ditto) this is an entirely tedious affair. I took a long time to get on board with the 1987 “Hellraiser” , I have to admit. It was wildly imaginative and original, like a nightmare transplanted on to film. However, the characters were stone cold and left me similarly chilly t
Read more

Review: Boyka: Undisputed

Yuri Boyka (Scott Adkins) is out of prison and fighting for a living, with ambitions for the ‘Most Complete Fighter’ to make a real name for himself. However, after an opponent dies during a fight, the deeply religious Boyka starts to have a crisis of conscience. He tries to make amends with the man’s widow, which eventually pits him against a local gangster (Alon Moni Aboutboul, quite good). Anything with Scott Adkins will generally get me interested, and although this series peaked with the superlative “Undisputed II: Last Man Standing” , this 2017 film from director Todor Chapkanov (director of the SyFy movies “Copperhead” and “Ghost Town” ) is no slouch in a series yet to deliver anything less than solid entertainment. Producer Isaac Florentine is missed in the director’s chair, but Chapkanov gives us at the very least the series’ most dramatically ambitious entry, as Adkins’ ‘most complete fighter’ Yuri Boyka continues on his journey to redemption here. In this one, the
Read more

Review: Ninja 2: Shadow of a Tear

Scott Adkins is once again Casey, an American proponent of the martial art of Ninjutsu. When Casey’s pregnant Japanese wife (Mika Hijii) is rubbed out, he’s on a vengeance mission to find her killers. A friendly face, Nakabara (Kane Kosugi) turns up at the funeral, and suggests Casey come to Thailand to deal with his grief in another country. Casey initially declines, but eventually takes Nakabara up on his offer. However, his wife’s murder still haunts Casey, and with intel supplied by Nakabara, the trail eventually leads Casey to a brutal drug baron named Goro (Shun Sugata).   I was extremely disappointed with the first “Ninja” , but had heard that this 2013 sequel from director Isaac Florentine ( “Undisputed II: Last Man Standing” , “Undisputed III: Redemption” , “Ninja” ) was a damn near masterpiece of the martial-arts action movie genre. Having now finally gotten my hot little hands on it, I’d say the hype is a bit much, but this is unquestionably a much better film than the f
Read more