Review: Last Man Standing
Bruce
Willis is John Smith, a grim-faced stranger of few words who drifts into the
tiny, dusty Texas town of Jericho during the Prohibition era. He just wants to
lay low, but finds himself stuck in a turf war between Italian-American (Ned
Eisenberg & Michael Imperioli) and Irish-American (David Patrick Kelly,
R.D. Call, and Patrick Kilpatrick) gangsters who each want him to help wipe out
the other gang. After realising that the local sheriff (Bruce Dern) is on the
take and doesn’t give a crap who does what to whom, Smith decides to play both
gangs against each other and make a pretty penny for himself. Endless gunfire
ensues. Christopher Walken plays Kelly’s scarred, gun-happy henchman named
Hickey. Karina Lombard plays the woman Kelly is crazy about, whilst Leslie Mann
is a hooker, Alexandra Powers is a hooker connected to Eisenberg, William
Sanderson is the local bartender, and Ken Jenkins is a US Marshal.
Writer-director
Walter Hill (“48HRS”, “Streets of Fire”, “Crossroads”)
swings and wildly misses with this dreary, monotonous 1996 re-tread of “Yojimbo”
(or if you prefer, “A Fistful of Dollars”). It’s basically 100
minutes of shooting, and Bruce Willis’ attempt at a hard-boiled narration is as
miserable and monotonous as his performance as a whole because the narration
leaves him with nothing to really act out and Willis doesn’t even try. Why give
us narration that gives us insight in the character? That’s what acting is for! He’d fare much better a
decade later with “Sin City”, whereas here the narration is badly
written and phony. Speaking of monotonous, the cinematography by Lloyd Ahern
(Hill’s “Trespass” and “Geronimo: An American Legend”) is brown,
dusty, and boring.
David
Patrick Kelly is OK, but unable to hold up the villainous end of things on his
own. Ned Eisenberg and Michael Imperioli are rather unthreatening and clichéd,
with even Willis’ character admitting that these guys are a long way from the
‘real thing’. OK, so why should I care? Christopher Walken is a giant
disappointment in the kind of much-hyped psycho role you think he’d
effortlessly nail. Unfortunately, for some reason he has chosen to adopt a
monotonous, sub-Eastwood rasp that robs him of everything that makes him
Christopher Walken, and therefore everything that makes him interesting.
Everyone talks his character up throughout the film, and it’s just Christopher
Walken with a sore throat. It’s a flat, lethargic performance from a usually
dynamic, quirky actor. None of the women on show here, meanwhile, make any
impression whatsoever, with Leslie Mann basically playing a skinny Jennifer
Tilly (Hey, I could’ve called her a skinny whore, I thought I’d be nice).
Bruce
Dern is the one bright spot in the cast, giving a nice, irritable performance
as the only interesting character in the film. Sure, character actor William
Sanderson is fine as the bartender, but what can you really do in that clichéd
role? More so than any previous version of this story, there’s really very
little story here. The shots start firing around the 11 minute mark, and they
barely take a breather throughout. Willis fires two guns, of course, being that
this is an action film from the mid-90s, when everyone was a lousy shot. The
one truly commendable asset is the kick-arse Ry Cooder (“Streets of Fire”,
“The Long Riders”) score, and it is
truly kick-arse.
Aside
from the stretch that prohibition-era Italian mobsters and Irish mobsters would
both be occupying the same dead-beat wild west town, I have no problems with
blending a western with prohibition-era stuff. The problem is that Hill has
botched it. It’s drearily one-note, unconvincing, and completely unengaging.
Willis gives a bored, wannabe Eastwood performance here, and has mostly been
giving this same tedious performance ever since. No fun at all.
Rating:
D
Comments
Post a Comment